I saw someone claim that narcissists can’t stand being spoken to with the authoritative tone that Camille used throughout. And honestly, it showed. There were several moments where it seemed like karen was close to losing it. I wish she would. Let everyone see her true, ugly colors. Let everyone know she is a domestic abuser and she commits perjury and thinks she can get away with both.
A disclaimer that I am not a psychiatrist, so I will not be making any comment about this issues.
I’d also like to note that the diagnose is from a doctor who’s a highly trained professional.
***The purpose of my sharing these screenshots is not to be insensitive or to “make fun” of people who’re struggling with mental health. This is for education purpose, and for those who are keeping up with this trial.
Here’s the hilarious thing about pro-Amber people: this case isn’t about who abused who, because Amber never cared to press charges because that would have been disproven in court just like its being disproven now, what with Amber’s legal team insulting the intelligence and threatening the careers of the vast majority of witnesses who were around Amber during and after the alleged abuses. Abuse that her legal team is no longer trying to prove occurred and begged the judge to dismiss the trial because even if they can’t prove Johnny ever laid a hand on her any time she claimed he did, he did verbally abuse her, and isn’t that enough? So what if she may possiblyhave boardline personality disorder. She’s stressed out being a girlboss, so she’s not to be blamed for elaborately orchestrated allegations she makes.
This case is about defamation of character and if Amber’s interview damaged Johnny’s career. Proving he did abuse her is supplemental TO that, but the issue remains: was Johnny cancelled for it?
Amber’s lawyers are happy to say he was cancelled, but blame anything else but her interview, but using the headlines of articles – not the articles themselves, mind you – from undetermined times of publication to say that a man who has been in 3-4 movies a year almost every year since Edward Scissorhands in 1990 and has been an addict that ENTIRE time, has somehow, suddenly lost Hollywood’s patience with his addictions and it just so happened to coincidentally have aligned with Amber’s tell all.
So, the dilemma for pro-Amber people is that this is a LEGAL situation and not just an opinioned moralistic diatribe. Are YOU willing to look someone in the eye and use the actual LEGAL point of this whole trial: “It remains to be seen if Johnny Depp did or did not batter Amber Heard, however, it cannot be overstated that Amber exposing Johnny for the alleged abuser he is did NOT cause his sudden expulsion from major Hollywood productions, such as Fantastic Beasts and Pirates 6. Especially since Amber did not technically name Johnny as the abuser in her interview so it remains to be seen if Amber was even referring to Johnny or if public speculation has led to naming Johnny as the abuser, which, in that case, also makes it not Amber’s fault that Johnny lost his deals.”
I want to sit down every single person who supports amber heard or claims its “mutual abuse”, and force them to listen to the 6 hours or so of audio recordings on youtube that clearly show Heard harassing, insulting, mocking, talking over, and gaslighting Depp, essentially psychologically torturing him, as well as admitting to hitting Depp, throwing things at him, chasing him through the house, and severing his finger which almost killed him.
Here’s Amber Heard’s photo in evidence and here’s what Dan Wootton at The Sun put on their front page.
Amber Heards team also refused to turn over the Metadata for these photos, so the date these photos were taken cannot be verified.
Also, that headline? The Sun is such an unspeakable pile of feces. A ‘serial’ abuser is an abuser that has more than one victim. How many victims JD had at the time? Zero.
No one in the UK, or indeed anyone who’s familiar with the infamous British tabloid press, gives a teensy bit of shit about what The Sun has to say.
It literally has no credibility here and everyone knows it is owned by the POS Rupert Murdoch. The Sun loves to cherry pick facts and run misleading stories with sensationalist headlines all the time. They will print anything if it means money. It gets sued all the fucking time lmao.
Anyone who tries to use the ruling of the UK trial to argue in AH’s favour is ignorant af. Find any British person and ask them what they think of The Sun lmao.
Okay but like people who have strong opinions on the Amber Heard and Johnny depp case, ..like how do you have strong opinions. How do you people decide which side you’re on , which are facts and which false accusations. Like. Genuinely.
For me, it comes down to this (and I’m taking this as a genuine quesion):
There’s verified audio of AH admitting to abusing JD. It’s been played in court and is being used as evidence.
JD leaves when there’s conflict. This is also from verified audio of AH mocking him for leaving so he doesn’t get hit again.
For all the accusations AH made, there’s no real evidence of injury. Some of the things she alleges would have left her in the hospital and yet she’s wearing backless dresses a day or two later with no evidence of injury (or even illusion netting to help hide injuries) or going on a talk show and moving in ways you can’t with bruised ribs. The only person who shows evidence of injury in photos is JD. (Continued a bit in #7)
They had access to 24/7 concierge medical care from a dedicated team. Not once after AH alleges she was brutalized were there notes supporting this. Not even a bruise is noted.
There’s audio of AH freaking out because she smashed JD’s finger. Everyone covered for her on it.
Not one of JD’s former wives or girlfriends has spoken badly of him as a person. Most of them are still cordial/friendly with him, which says a lot. Was he a perfect husband or boyfriend? Probably not, but there’s no evidence he was ever abusive to anyone.
Johnny Depp was diagnosed with ADHD in 2014. Drugs like cocaine don’t act the same way with an ADHD physiology as they do in someone not ADHD. Basically, for JD it would be like taking Ritalin. The reports that he mellowed out on drugs are likely true - that’s what stimulant drugs do when you have ADHD.
AH’s claims keep changing (things she claimed happened in 2013 now happened in 2012). She’s adding things on the stand that she’s never alleged before. Some things she claimed before or now are proved a lie by pictures taken by a property manager (Australia) or body cam (LA), or by paparazzi photos taken a day to a week after attacks that would have been brutal and would have left marks (being dragged through broken glass/walking through broken glass means stitches).
She and her team have refused to hand over her phone. They’ve provided pictures, but those pictures have no metadata included, so they can’t be verified. Essentially, any proof she provides is ‘because I said so’.
Basically, believing everything AH says as true would lead me to completely abandoning all common sense and reason.
What about the fact that she’s changed details over and over since this all blew up?
2016:He didn’t let me see my friends or family! I was kept isolated from everyone!
2022: Friends and family were living on the property, rent free the whole time and frequently came over for dinner.
2016:He would always chase me down and I could never have a moment of peace!
2022: Literal recordings of her mocking him for 'always running’ and 'never fighting for the relationship’. Admits to following him when he locks himself in bathrooms or bedrooms to get away from her. Calls him a coward for doing it.
Over and over, things she claimed in 2016 have changed by 2022.
Female abusers (whether physical, sexual, or emotional) are just as disgusting as male abusers. They deserve absolutely no sympathy.
Male survivors, whether victimized by other men or women, aren’t rare. They are just as valid as female survivors. They deserve nothing but sympathy and support and they certainly don’t deserve misandry.
Amber Heard is just one of many female abusers. Johnny Depp is just one of many male victims. If you support Amber Heard and/or don’t support Johnny Depp, fuck you.
The biggest problem with Amber Heard Stans that we really haven’t addressed in enough detail is their blatant sexism and their fetishizing of abuse.
When women defend Johnny Depp they simply must be doing it because they like him, they can’t possibly be capable of an independent thought; they can’t possibly have looked at the evidence and come to a conclusion based on facts. They simply must be huge Pirates fans who wish he’d make another movie.
When men defend Johnny Depp it’s because they simply must be in the boys club. They must hate all women. They must be abusive. They couldn’t possibly be forming an opinion based on facts; it must be absolute sexist hatred. They couldn’t possibly be victims of DV themselves. They couldn’t possibly be advocating for Johnny to protect the survivors in their own lives.
The worst is being an SA/DV survivor defending Johnny Depp. Because again, there’s no way we looked at the facts. And because we couldn’t possibly be defending him because we know how it feels to not be believed or because we relate to the physical and emotional pain of what he went through. We couldn’t possibly be defending Johnny Depp because we know what it’s like… There’s no way that I spent hours curled up in a corner crying after I saw that video of him and Dakota Johnson.
No, it’s none of that. I simply must have the hots for him. I must like him and wanna fuck him. I’m an SA survivor defending Johnny Depp so I must be a hoe. That’s what Amber Heard Stan’s think. That I was asking for it. That I am asking for it.
What happens when non-binary people defend him?
considering most of her supporters are radfems i highly doubt they’ll even acknowledge the existence of non binary people
In light of the trial that has started this past week, I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone of my followers that this is a pro-Johnny Depp blog.
Guys, we are not out the weeds yet for Johnny, I’m afraid.
There’s another civil trial against Johnny in the Greg Brooks v. Johnny Depp, et al. in California happening in July. Brooks is suing Johnny for emotional distress, and assault & battery.
Luckily, Camille is also representing Johnny in that case. Poor Camille, she gets no breaks.
Also, there’s no cameras in that trial, so we have to rely on the media to tell us about it, as well.
All I’m saying is that, this interview, was definitely foreshadowing what she would be like on the stand.
She has those same mannerisms in that video (which was universally hated while she was in a much better light) like she does when she was on the stand.
The only thing I’m a little shaky on is how JD’s team talks about how AH does not have PTSD. It’s possible she does have cPTSD from childhood abuse or otherwise. The recordings reflect hardcore abandonment trauma, which is a telltale borderline trait. If AH hadn’t taken her lies this far and caused so much harm, I would have more compassion for her bc she does need serious help.
Understandable. But that’s not what Amber, herself, is claiming. She claimed that she suffer from PTSD, not cPTSD. There’s actually a difference there, and not only that, she’s claiming that suffered this from the hands of Johnny, not her childhood at the hands of her father.
There’s a reason while she was on the stand, she talked very, and I do mean, very little about her childhood and the alleged abuse from her father. Even when Whitney on the stand, Elaine didn’t really ask about their childhood.
If Amber’s team would’ve dived in to it, it would contradict her earlier claims to suffering from PSTD from the relationship. That’s simply why she had an IME in the first place.
So yeah, it’s could very well be a possibility, but that’s not the issue that was brought forth by her. And to speculate otherwise, is kind of disrespectful to her imo.
The list on who’s on the final jury in the Depp v. Heard civil trial that is currently ongoing in Fairfax, Virginia.
(demonstrations from CourtTv & Rob from @Law & Lumber, one to show the full jury & the other to show the dimssed alternates)
The two alternates were Juror #2/B & Juror #8/H. Juror #2 is a Asian male, who is in the mid 20s. Juror #8 is a older White woman, who’s in her fifties. They were both assumed by lawyers and reporters, Ian (@.RunkleOfTheBailey), Larry @.DUI Guy), Rob (@.Law&Lumber), and James, (@JamesFromCourt) to be Pro-Johnny.
The remaining jury are these 7 individuals in total below.
1. Juror #1/A, a Asian male, assumed to be in his mid 20s to early 30s.
2. Juror #3/C, a Asian male, assumed to be in his mid 30s.
3. Juror #4/D, a Black woman, assumed to be in her mid 40s to early 50s.
4. Juror #5/E, a Asian woman, assumed to be in her early 30s.
5. Juror #6/F, a White man, assumed to be in his mid 60s.
6. Juror #7/G, a White man, assumed to be in his late 20s to early 30s.
7. Juror #9/I, a Asian man, assumed to be in his 40s. Interesting enough, this juror is assumed to be very Anti-Amber, to point of out right give her a scrawl when she was on the stand.
5 men, 2 women.
All of these 7 jurors must come to an unanimous decision to reach a verdict in this case.
I suspect the juror’s identities are gonna be a source of a lot of Op-Eds if they rule unfavorably for Heard, particularly the ratio of male to female. Since most of them are non-white I suspect some racist commentary under the guise of feminism might be smuggled in too.
I see what you’re saying, but I don’t think it will work out to well for her on the PR move on either of your proposed fronts.
The issue on complaining about the gender ratio on jury will be, her team picked and agreed on the jury. So, that will literally go nowhere, and will actually reflect really badly on her team.
The racism angle will be really weird and also backfire horribly on her. Amber has a history on being seen as “racist”, so this will probably add to it if they try to conjure up the angle. Also I wonder how that racial angle will go? Amber is a cis-white woman obviously; so let’s disregard her past a moment. If they push too hard, it could also backfire in which “POC abused women are never heard, and we only care about white women who’s abused”.
But I definitely think they are going down that radical feminist route. Sprinkle in how the trial shouldn’t be televised, people leaking things on Twitter, memes on her appearance and behavior in court, and you got a pretty dumb PR stunt. Also tie in some biphobia, cause why not?
The list on who’s on the final jury in the Depp v. Heard civil trial that is currently ongoing in Fairfax, Virginia.
(demonstrations from CourtTv & Rob from @Law & Lumber, one to show the full jury & the other to show the dimssed alternates)
The two alternates were Juror #2/B & Juror #8/H. Juror #2 is a Asian male, who is in the mid 20s. Juror #8 is a older White woman, who’s in her fifties. They were both assumed by lawyers and reporters, Ian (@.RunkleOfTheBailey), Larry @.DUI Guy), Rob (@.Law&Lumber), and James, (@JamesFromCourt) to be Pro-Johnny.
The remaining jury are these 7 individuals in total below.
1. Juror #1/A, a Asian male, assumed to be in his mid 20s to early 30s.
2. Juror #3/C, a Asian male, assumed to be in his mid 30s.
3. Juror #4/D, a Black woman, assumed to be in her mid 40s to early 50s.
4. Juror #5/E, a Asian woman, assumed to be in her early 30s.
5. Juror #6/F, a White man, assumed to be in his mid 60s.
6. Juror #7/G, a White man, assumed to be in his late 20s to early 30s.
7. Juror #9/I, a Asian man, assumed to be in his 40s. Interesting enough, this juror is assumed to be very Anti-Amber, to point of out right give her a scrawl when she was on the stand.
5 men, 2 women.
All of these 7 jurors must come to an unanimous decision to reach a verdict in this case.
I just wanted to bring out that whatever negative speculation we have about AH’s lawyers: that they are the worst attorneys, that they must have this hate towards JD and his lawyers. We should remember that they are for the most part just doing their jobs. Yes they come off like they have a disdain towards the opposing side but they are trying to argue for their client. And a lot of lawyers have had times where they’ve done a bad job or took on a bad client or is just fighting a case where the evidence is not on their side. I’ve legit heard a lawyer who represented someone who is clearly guilty of murder, say on closing that “Just ignore the evidence; my client couldn’t have killed this person because he came from a good family”.
Yes to of this 100%. It’s actually being reported that after closing, Chew & Bredehoft was seen shaking hands and being very friendly with each other. As well as the same with Rottenborn.
It must be said, time and time again. While Elaine is terrible, and I do mean, terrible at trial, I have no doubt she’s worth every bit of that $600/h she’s getting paid. The realest MVP is Ben Rottenborn for them, and while the arguments are shit, he’s a damn good attorney. Honestly, if he was on Johnny’s team, we’ve would be saying he’s the best damn attorney in the world. Not only that, he’s getting paid peanuts compared to everyone else in this case. Literally, everyone else. He’s getting paid $325/h. He’s definitely worth more, at least $800/h honestly.
So again, don’t ever say that anyone on Amber’s team are bad “lawyers”. They are not, they are just working with bad “facts”.
And I still stand by my assertions that Rottenborn doesn’t like Amber one bit.
It’s not just that they are working with bad facts, they are working with a bad client who refuses to do her job.
Fuckin’ yes. A lot of decisions in this case was clearly made by Amber, and Amber alone. Like keeping the counterclaim.
I just wanted to bring out that whatever negative speculation we have about AH’s lawyers: that they are the worst attorneys, that they must have this hate towards JD and his lawyers. We should remember that they are for the most part just doing their jobs. Yes they come off like they have a disdain towards the opposing side but they are trying to argue for their client. And a lot of lawyers have had times where they’ve done a bad job or took on a bad client or is just fighting a case where the evidence is not on their side. I’ve legit heard a lawyer who represented someone who is clearly guilty of murder, say on closing that “Just ignore the evidence; my client couldn’t have killed this person because he came from a good family”.
Yes to of this 100%. It’s actually being reported that after closing, Chew & Bredehoft was seen shaking hands and being very friendly with each other. As well as the same with Rottenborn.
It must be said, time and time again. While Elaine is terrible, and I do mean, terrible at trial, I have no doubt she’s worth every bit of that $600/h she’s getting paid. The realest MVP is Ben Rottenborn for them, and while the arguments are shit, he’s a damn good attorney. Honestly, if he was on Johnny’s team, we’ve would be saying he’s the best damn attorney in the world. Not only that, he’s getting paid peanuts compared to everyone else in this case. Literally, everyone else. He’s getting paid $325/h. He’s definitely worth more, at least $800/h honestly.
So again, don’t ever say that anyone on Amber’s team are bad “lawyers”. They are not, they are just working with bad “facts”.
And I still stand by my assertions that Rottenborn doesn’t like Amber one bit.
