Other tags: wincest, incest, masturbation, master/slave dynamics, submissive Dean, mentions of knotting, mentions of underage sex, public sex
Summary: Monsters have taken over and established a slave trade. Dean is caught during a hunt and sold at auction. Sam is able to procure ownership of his brother, but now the two of them must navigate this new dynamic.
Written for SPN Dystopia Bang and fills master/slave square for @spnkinkbingo
Warnings: Other than the obvious, Dubcon for John unaware it’s Dean.
Sunmary: During a hunt in Memphis back in 2002, Dean dips out on John to scratch an itch. When John shows up at the same bar with the same itch, Dean’s all too happy to keep this scathing little secret to himself.
Crouching female nude with bended head by Egon Schiele, 1918.
On June 18th, 1915, three days after his wedding, Schiele was conscripted into the Austrian army. Due to his excellence in handwriting, he spent most of the war working as a clerk in a POW camp. He continued to draw, encouraged by his commanding officer.
Despite avoiding action on the front lines, Schiele did not survive to see the Armistice. His wife, six months pregnant, fell victim to the Spanish Influenza pandemic on Oct. 28th, 1918. Schiele, who had also contracted the disease, capitulated three days later. He was 28.
One hundred years after his death, Schiele is categorized with a group of erotic artists that includes one of his mentors, Gustav Klimt. I’m not sure that’s the right place for Schiele, as although his major works have sexual themes, they are often grotesque.
In 1912, Schiele was arrested for seducing a girl under the age of consent. He was ultimately convicted on a lesser charge of showing pornography to a child. He may also have initiated an incestuous relationship with his sister, Gerti, when she was 12. On at least one occasion, he was forced to move out of town due to suspicions he had molested teenage girls posing for him.
Whereas Klimt unabashedly celebrated eroticism, I think Schiele had a much darker perspective on sexuality. Although there can be beauty in brutality, Schiele’s work is tinged by a sense of repulsion, perhaps self-directed.
The gap of time does not allow for confirmation or rejection of the rumours surrounding Schiele, The art he left behind, however, has a distorted and delinquent quality (for example, the portrayal of the genitals of the redheaded model, above) which–and mine is a minority opinion–isn’t so sexy.
“Louis and Dominique could be such a good ship if they both grew up alive. Especially if Domi was allowed to spend more time with him and understand him better. But alas, the fate is cruel, and so is Jun Mochizuki.“
I stumbled across the reddit /molestation sub and expected it to be a safe space for survivors to discuss their abuse.
Turns out most of the people who frequent that sub are actually pedophiles looking to jerk off to victims’ stories.
“In detail please.”
“How can I join a group like the one that abused you?”
“Pm me”
“Embrace it and enjoy it”
Etc, etc.
This is disgusting, but you know what’s not remotely shocking? Every single one of these disgusting fucks had a page that was entirely full of posts on pedophile, incest, and rape kink pages.
They’re using ACTUAL VICTIMS to play out their “harmless fantasy”.
They’re encouraging victims to retrauamtize themselves by reenacting their trauma with these guys.
One of the “this is a harmless kink that you should enjoy post-abuse” posters, who I did not get a screenshot of because I reflexively blocked him automatically, had a username like “LovesLittleGirls3”.
All of these predators are telling survivors that it’s healthy to cope by retraumatizing themselves and participating in harmful kinks.
It’s not “just fantasy” when you sick fucks are seeking out victims to get off to their pain, and encouraging them to hurt themselves further.
Content warnings: pseudo-incest, yandere shit, kidnapping, not a/b/o but there’s mentions of going into heat, size difference(although I’m not sure how well I wrote it), talking about a past murder(but no actual killing), choking, stalking, dumbification, kind of shy/skittish reader, drugging(w/ pills and w/ a syringe), brief mention of drug usage, needles, slimy men…there’s a lot of slimy men in here
For no particular reason at all….. just a reminder that john lennon was racist and abused his ex wife and good fucking riddance
I keep seeing people bring up in the main tag how Lennon tried to be a better man even throughout his history of abuse but like. Can we acknowledge the racism? Can we acknowledge his creepy feelings for his mother? He was horrible on many levels! If you’re gonna defend him then please don’t leave out this shit.
You sit on the couch recounting today’s mission. Itachi is in the shower, leaving you alone to your thoughts.
The mission was easy enough, you and Itachi were sent to find a missing shinobi who had been stealing from people in the village. You both found her in no time, but when she drew a kunei, Itachi ordered you to stay out of the fight. He’s a protective older brother like that. He fought the shinobi in an elegant battle that almost looked like they were dancing if you didn’t know any better. He eventually bested her and you both brought her to the Hokage.
You twiddle your thumbs as you wait for your brother to finish cleaning up, lost in your thoughts.
Today, a truly well-made classic horror film…and a forgettable abomination against taste.
Black Christmas (1974), directed by Bob Clark, is a Canadian horror movie and arguably the very first slasher. I say “arguably” because it 1.) came out pretty much exactly the same time as Texas Chain Saw Massacre and 2.) it’s kind of a bridge between Giallo horror and slasher. Here’s an article that sums that up, so I don’t spend a day babbling about it: https://www.ghoulsmagazine.com/articles/12-ghouls-christmas-blackchristmas-1974-giallo-to-slasher
This is the second time I’ve seen this movie, and I really genuinely do love it. It’s tightly plotted, with all of its elements meticulously foreshadowed and paid off. Its resolution is legitimately chilling, and it succeeds because – despite its ambiguity – the plot’s logic has been so tight that we understand in an instant exactlywhat’s going on…unlike anyone on screen who could actually do something to stop it. Augh. It’s just so good.
Which cannot be said for…
Black Christmas (2006), often shorted as Black X-Mas, was so terrible that I almost felt compelled to apologize to the Texas Chainsaw Massacre reboot by comparison.
The film is directed by Glen Morgan, who you’ll recognize as the guy who remade Willard in 2003. Sadly, despite Willardbeing a favorite film of mine, he just didn’t pull off the same magic with this. I guess part of that is due to executive meddling – Morgan had a lot of issues with the studio execs, Harvey Weinstein in particular (ugh) regarding the film’s tone and ending. There was also a ton of footage filmed for promotional material that was never part of the script or included in the movie.
Anyway. This movie takes the approach of delving deep into Billy’s backstory, so I guess we have to talk about that. Spoilers for a 50-year-old movie incoming.
In the original film, we hear the names “Billy” and “Agnes” come up in the menacing phone calls. It’s not superclear what’s going on with them, but it kind of sounds like the caller is maybe mimicking or re-enacting being yelled at as a child, or some sort of domestic strife in general. It’s mixed in with bits of dialogue and things the caller has overhead in the house itself – like someone will say something in the house, and the caller will reference it later in a creepy way like “Hey was that a coincidence or was he listening to us?”
We know, as the viewer, that the killer is in the sorority house. We see him, in a POV shot, enter in the beginning, and we catch glimpses of him lurking around in the attic. The people *in* the movie think that the killer is actually one of the boyfriends, who we’ve seen acting like a temperamental douche-nozzle.
But the original film never resolves the identity of the killer. You never once figure out who the hell this guy in the attic is, what’s up with those phone calls, why he’s killing people, none of that. Which is, in my mind, a great strength of the original film. It’s much scarier that way and, frankly, we don’t needto know why killers kill people.
Anyway. So with all of that…back to Black X-Mas.
Glen Morgan decided that the way to approach this remake is to center it on the Billy character, aka, the killer. We see him locked up in a high-security mental hospital/prison ward type facility (which also has a fucking stupid little side plot with a santa claus, ugh) and then we get spoon-fed his entire backstory through a series of flashbacks.
Billy’s backstory was apparently loosely inspired by the real-life killer Edmund Kemper. We see this kid abused and neglected by his parents, locked in an attic, then raped by his motherwhen he’s 12 years old in order to produce a daughter for her to spoil and lavish with attention. Yeah. Oh, and don’t worry, just to make things even more obnoxious, when little sister Agnes grows up to be a killer just like her brother-daddy, she’s also cast by a male actor, because what’s scarier than an ugly mannish girl am I right.
/screams into a pillow for several minutes/
ANYWAY.
Aside from that, the rest of the movie is pretty boring. I kept mixing up characters because all of the pretty white girls sound/act/look the same and have no defining personality traits between them. The plot gets tugged along without anyone having any agency or making any choices. A couple of the kills are kind of neat. But its’ overwhelmingly just dumb. We’re supposed to believe that these characters are snowed into the house and unable to escape when there’s like half an inch of snow on the ground!
Supreme stupidity. Do not watch. It’s gross and boring and you too will be unable to get the mental image of Billy’s mom out of your head.
Tune in next time when we watch the otherBlack Christmas remake from 2019, which I’ve heard is also terrible but surely cannot be as terrible as this!
i see a lot of “korekiyo was abused by his sister” headcanons, but why do i never see it the other way around?? like it could very well be korekiyo being extremely abusive towards his sister to the point she commits suicide, then thinks he’s helping her out by sending her “friends”. don’t get me wrong, i don’t hatehim, but i just don’t understand where the first hc comes from in the first place
with that said none of this matters bc it’s just the creator of dr being super weird about incest and we should all acknowledge this already (. .)
I’ve been thirsting over the idea of being Naoya’s little sister and secretly pining for Choso. Coz who wouldn’t? Choso is so kind and warm even though he’s so cold to everyone else. You just want to be his little sister. You wish you’re his little sister instead of Naoya’s.
Naoya is horrible despite being your own flesh and blood. He’s the worst aniki anyone could ever have. There’s nothing more disgusting than the way he hates and insults you then later on asking if your virginity is still intact coz according to him, that’s how brothers keep the daughters in their family in good condition.
Title:Puppeteer, Pick Up My Strings Author:Suzume Pairing:Dahlia/Iris Rating:Teen Warnings: Underage, Incest Wordcount:3,151 Summary: Iris has learned to live on her own, but she’d rather have Dahlia make her dance.
Ruby was worried about going to Beacon, and after hearing it was a sexual haven with both students and teachers scared her even more. Luckily Yang was there to be a good big sister, and with a little futa-dust she happily took Ruby’s virginity herself.
