This is interesting - if the ads were sexist before what makes them less sexist after the “change”? If they are still sexist, why are they acceptable after the “change”? Are they acceptable?
I would argue, no.
But the troubling thought is that this post was tagged feminism. So the conclusion I jump to is that this brand of feminism is geared not so much towards gender equality, or the eradication of sexism, but more towards woman placed in a position of power over men; switching roles, as it were.
Seems counter productive to the whole movement. Vilifying one group generally does not ingratiate that group to a cause or idea. This isn’t social justice, this is social vendetta.
It’s satire you moron.
It’s showing men that don’t understand how their insulting gender role views are insulting to women.