#aur rambles about gender

LIVE

libraford:

libraford:

libraford:

I am so tired of ‘agender clothing lones’ that look like formless tunics from a dystopian future where everyone eats lasers, then acting like its revolutionary enough to charge $300 for a pink hoodie.

155$ for a chain bracelet- good god.


I’m sure this is a look for someone, so I wont knock it entirely. But 'genderless clothing’ so far has been along these lines and its like…. one boring skirt and a bunch of Male-leaning everything else in prices no regular person can afford. And it shows to me that designers are interested in genderlessness as an art form or a concept or a performance instead of their function, which is to be clothed.

If it’s not this, its funky Hawaiian shirts (which I dig) but only made for a specific shape of person. Still $70.

Theres no reason to reinvent the wheel. The way you make genderless clothing is by making styles already in existence, but for more body shapes.

loading