#jenny beth martin is a huge piece of shit btw

LIVE

alanshemper:

soul-hammer:

Guy who advised the CIA that waterboarding was chill & that inflicted pain only qualifies as torture if it presents the risk of organ failure or imminent death will now run the DHS disinfo board https://t.co/euMDzFppwD https://t.co/8NQBSRfqlf pic.twitter.com/qi86PS3frS — 12 Ball (@BoltzmannBooty) May 22, 2022

i guess he's actually leading a "thorough review and assessment" of the board, not leading the board itself--my bad, top tweet is not perfectly accurate https://t.co/yj3U7zP6jy — 12 Ball (@BoltzmannBooty) May 23, 2022

WASHINGTON, Jan. 28 [2005] - Michael Chertoff, who has been picked by President Bush to be the homeland security secretary, advised the Central Intelligence Agency on the legality of coercive interrogation methods on terror suspects under the federal anti-torture statute, current and former administration officials said this week.

Depending on the circumstances, he told the intelligence agency, some coercive methods could be legal, but he advised against others, the officials said.

Mr. Chertoff’s previously undisclosed involvement in evaluating how far interrogators could go took place in 2002-3 when he headed the Justice Department’s criminal division. The advice came in the form of responses to agency inquiries asking whether C.I.A. employees risked being charged with crimes if particular interrogation techniques were used on specific detainees.

Mr. Chertoff’s division was asked on several occasions by the intelligence agency whether its officers risked prosecution by using particular techniques. The officials said the C.I.A. wanted as much legal protection as it could obtain while the Justice Department sought to avoid giving unconditional approval.

[…] One current and two former senior officials with firsthand knowledge of the interaction between the C.I.A. and the Justice Department said that while the criminal division did not explicitly approve any requests by the agency, it did discuss what conditions could protect agency personnel from prosecution….

[archive.org copy of the NYT article]

loading