#and academic fights are some of the best

Topics that are guaranteed to start a fight if you ask two or more Pokemon Professors about them;

• How many limbs does Grappeloct have (I personally refuse to accept its Belt as a limb unless it shows it can move. And the four “arms” are on thin ice they might just be two)
• Does a pokemon count as fully mature *before* a stone or item evolution happens or is it a form of Neoteny.
• Is it ethical to revive scrambled pokemon fossils (Everyone outside of Galar goes “No! What is wrong with you?!”)
• Is it ethical to revive fossil pokemon at all
• Is it ethical to breed fossil pokemon and revive the species?
• Are humans related more to humanoid pokemon or ape-like pokemon? Or are humans something entirely different? You can’t put a human in a pokeball but is that by design or do we have a different origin? (Okay this one the pokemon professors I hope have figured out but it WEIGHS ON MY MIND)
• Should wurmple be split into two species that simply co-evolved to be VERY similar, or is this a case of split evolution?
• Should Pokemon be only classified by their mature form/final evolution and in that case see above, any other split evolution lines, and the debate on item evolutions.
• Is it ethical to evolve Paras or the Deino family line? (Deino gains a second conciousness on evolution, and then loses one to the dominant mind when it evolves again, so it might not even be the personality it started with)
• Who created Porygon Z- it ran rampant through everyones Emails and messed up so much data. Nobody has fessed up yet but SOMEONE had the data.
• Is it ethical to delete a porygon when it’s on your computer.
• Is it ethical to introduce Rotom and Porygon.

Not an argument but additionally: NEVER put a magnemite-line pokemon near your Rotom.

Feel free to add more!