#exclusionary tactics
hey so riddle me this exclusionists:
how tf can you continue to insist that “allo” is a slur but then wield “aceys” and “asexies” as if they’re harmless jokes? IMHO, aceys and asexies are being used much more consistently as slurs than allo; which actually serves a REAL purpose linguistically whilst aceys and asexies exist purely to harm us. I’ve only ever seen allo used (seemingly) genuinely offensively twice but aceys and asexies are used to PURELY offend all. the. time.
but of course, it never counts if it’s against us aceys amirite?!?!
asexies is a slur now
never said it was but i knew jerks like you would jump on my post and insist that’s my argument.
to be clear, my point is this:
none of them are in fact slurs but allo(romantic/sexual) gets called a slur for the exact same reasons that the words “aceys” and “asexies” were actually explicitly created: with the intention of harming the entire aspec community. i’m saying that this is transparent, hypocritical, and aphobic as fuck and it’s gotta stop now.
