#independent contractor

LIVE
trekwiz:trekwiz: Ok, but if you’re an independent contractor in the US and this happens? Find a lawytrekwiz:trekwiz: Ok, but if you’re an independent contractor in the US and this happens? Find a lawytrekwiz:trekwiz: Ok, but if you’re an independent contractor in the US and this happens? Find a lawytrekwiz:trekwiz: Ok, but if you’re an independent contractor in the US and this happens? Find a lawy

trekwiz:

trekwiz:

Ok, but if you’re an independent contractor in the US and this happens? Find a lawyer, because you might have just gotten a huge payday.

Your position was just referred to as employment. Independent contractors do not have employers; they do not have employment. Congrats, your contact at this company just provided evidence that you were illegally missclassified.

This contact is claiming that you have set hours you’re obligated to fulfill. Unless a work task can only be done at a set time for practical reasons (i.e. you’re an audio freelancer paid to support a live event that occurs at a particular time and requires a certain amount of pre-show setup), a company cannot set an independent contractor’s work hours. This is further evidence that you were missclassified.

The whole exchange establishes that the company is interpreting an employer-employee relationship rather than expecting a service. Discipline and potential for firing (you cannot fire an independent contractor; no longer purchasing their service is not equivalent) establish that this person views themselves as a manager. Independent contractors cannot have managers.

This one text exchange could:

  • Get you back pay for the full duration you’ve worked there, to bring you up to the compensation that an employee would have gotten
  • Get you back compensation for lost benefits that an employee would have gotten
  • Get you back pay for the additional self-employment taxes the company should have covered
  • Get the company to pay back taxes to the government
  • Get the company to hire everyone who performed a similar role, or face further penalties and fines
  • A win would encourage the rest of their missclassified workers to sue for the same, or give them leverage to demand a better deal

If the company is going to screw you over like that, may as well make them pay for it.

Since this is getting a lot of reblogs, here’s a federal source that can help you determine if you’re illegally classified as a contractor:

You can also file a form with the IRS to force the company to correct your classification (assuming you meet the criteria), without necessarily having to sue:

Keep in mind that this is just federal. Most states also prohibit missclassification as an independent contractor; and even if states have more lenient rules, companies still have to comply with this federal law. The rules have largely been bipartisan and existed for decades, so they’re common.

States also have an interest in having regulations about missclassification: it’s a significant loss of tax revenue. Your self employment tax does not fully equal what a company would have paid for you in payroll taxes.

A lawyer can help point you in the right direction if a company is currently missclassifying you.


Post link
 Common Tax Deductions for Construction WorkersRegardless of your trade in the construction industry

Common Tax Deductions for Construction Workers

Regardless of your trade in the construction industry, allowable tax deductions can lower your tax liability and possibly lead to getting a tax refund. You can deduct common expenses such as tools and materials, and even certain other items that come in handy in your business or on the job. 

If you’re an employee for a construction company, rather than an independent contractor, and your employer doesn’t reimburse you for expenses on the job, your unreimbursed employee expenses are no longer deductible. Independent contractors generally have no limit on the ability to deduct work related expenses. See the full TurboTax article for details so you can plan ahead.


Post link

it didn’t really hit me until a couple of days ago when class numbers started to go down and classes starting to be cancelled that teaching is my income. it is an unsettling and tough time for everyone and especially independent contractors and small businesses. I understand that people want to suspend their memberships immediately and have notice periods waived, but I urge you to think of these studios and how much that one extra payment can help for them to make it through this time and still exist at the end. I also want to thank the studio owners who are doing everything they can to keep classes running so that we have work. for my classes that are still running I won’t be using props and will stay teaching from the mat. everything is cleaned meticulously but please feel free to bring your own mat and props and know that you do not have to use any props. I never noticed how much I like to physically adjust you all, so that has stopped too! in this high stress time, coming to yoga will help give your mind a break from obsessing over the things that are happening right now. but I understand the importance social distancing, so please do what you think is best.

In California it takes a 2/3rds vote of the state legislature to amend the state constitution.  If passed prop 22 would require a 7/8ths vote to be changed.  This proposition would be harder to change than the state constitution. That’s mostly why I’m voting NO.

I’ve done independent contract work for over a decade (never for uber/lyft because when I looked into it the pay didn’t seem worth the cost) I do think there are benefits to working that way which many people including me enjoy and even prefer but this proposition is garbage designed to entrench a flawed system.  I do think there is a way to make IC work more viable but prop 22 isn’t it. Vote No.

loading