I love how you can make previous posts about Neutrals and or Turd fans, where you state “don’t interact with my posts” and they still find a way to do so. So because I’m tired of the back and forth this person is trying keep in the comments I figured I’d just lay it all out right here.
• Of course I can’t have a legal verdict Amber Jr, I’m not a lawyer. What I do have is eyes, ears and a brain. And anyone with those key elements can see Amber is the abuser.
• “Because Depp lost his case in the UK” As if victims of abuse haven’t lost against their abuser. What does that prove? Nothing. That’s the weirdest thing her fans use.
• “If Depp did this we need to move on and let go” Good thing I don’t think he did it? I think it’s going to be harder for Turd fans to move on than us.
• Evidence the son of the judge was friends with the guy who posted her stuff. I have better, connections between Amber and the judge.
Judge Andrew Nicol wrote a book with Geoffrey Robertson called “Media law” quick Google search I’m sure you can find it. He was also employed by Robertsons firm.
Geoffrey Robertson is the mentor to and employer of Jennifer Robinson who is Ambers counsel. JR and AH went to a dinner where Baroness Helena Kennedy and host Kathy Lette were in attendance.
Baroness Helena was also employed by Robertsons firm which is called “Doughty Street Chambers”. Kathy Lette is Geoffrey Robertsons ex-wife, yet their all close friends with Jennifer Robinson.
And onto the son! Since you wanted proof. His son works for Talkradio, Talkradio employs Dan Wootton. DAN WOOTTON WROTE THE ARTICLE CALLING JOHNNY A WIFE BEATER.
It’s the article that Johnny used for the UK trial. You can kinda draw your own connections I mean honestly? Nancy Drew could solve this one.
The Judge with his connection to Heards legal team, denied all his claims even with all of Johnnys evidence, sided with the girl who hires Jennifer employee of GR friend to his ex wife. You can legit Google all this yourself and find it out through people who’ve also dug enough , though most isn’t a secret.
• The restraining order bs
Obviously Amber gave the same photos and texts she gave her lawyers, I mean come on guys. And she walked in looking like she came from a funeral, where she got into a brawl with Whitney who had to defend herself by punching Amber. ♀️ Judge saw one side to the allegations, saw her baby bruise and signed off. It’s that easy. Stop using this against him like it’s proves anything.
• Multiple evidence has been brought against Depp? Have you been watching the trial? He has just as much on her, even stuff to go against her “proof”. And the UK trial isn’t damning at all, it just shows what an abusers connections get them.
Is this enough to answer your questions? Maybe stop interacting with posts that are Pro Johnny Depp. If you guys don’t like our posts, then skip them, ignore them. I don’t Interact with AH posts, or neutral posts, so stay off of mine.
[credit to the people who found this evidence that I was able to read through and type up! I won’t link them, because AH fans might attack the people. Google search yourselves turd smugglers]
Fuckin’ TMZ is profiting on the Depp v. Heard trial.
They are made a documentary special on Hulu, called TMZ Presents: Johnny v. Amber — From Love to Hate.
Don’t care your opinions, this fucking vile. Especially when they fight tooth and nail to keep Morgan Tremaine out of court, threaten Judge Azcarate, and threaten to sue. That’s digusting when they only turned around to make a profit on a domestic violence case.
DO NOT WATCH THIS SHIT ON HULU.
TMZ never had a lot of credibility or journalistic integrity to begin with, they’re a tabloid and all they care about is getting dirty laundry out to make headlines whether it’s true or not (from reporting miley cyrus dead in 2008, announcing lil’ wayne’s impending death in 2013, to posting fake photos of people like whitney houston and jfk) but this is a whole new low.
The actual trial is available for freethere’s no point in this show existing.
Why do we have to watch AH’s lies play out in HD again? If anyone is still confused about what happened, please just watch the actual trial instead of giving TMZ money for making this.
Something that is standing out to me so much is that people who support Johnny Depp and have talked about it… seem fairly level-headed in it. I have not seen many Depp supporters throwing out every accusation under the sun against people who support Amber Heard. (The closest I see is people saying that anyone who supports her supports is an abuser, which is just the truth.)
On the contrary, people still supporting Amber Heard call Depp supporters every possible insult under the sun. Homophobe, biphobe, transphobe, misogynist, rape-apologist, etc. Pretty much everything that most people would not want to be called. But I doubt I, a woman who has been a victim of a man before (not going into details here), am a misogynist. I doubt the many other women who have been victims of violence at the hands of men but still support Johnny Depp are misogynists. I doubt my friends, most of whom are gay or bisexual or transgender/nonbinary, are phobic against themselves.
The statements released by both parties after the verdict also indicate a lot about their characters. Someone else made a post that summed it up better, but Johnny talked about the people involved, including his children, lawyers, and the jury. Amber… talked about how she apparently lost her freedom of speech.
I made a post about AH and I was literally sent death threats. I had to turn off comments, reblogs, messages and asks after my post got upwards of 200 notes in a day. And me - bi survivor - was also called biphobic/homophobic and misogynistic.
The fact that really got to me is that every account I blocked (literally dozens) was a self proclaimed terf/radfem blog and they were calling me a bad person for disliking AH - you know, an actual liar and abuser, but in their minds I guess it’s totally cool to be transphobic for no reason other than people existing.
No wonder these are the people who support AH, they’re just as shit.
Some things I’ve noticed amongst Amber Heard supporters;
You are not a woman if you don’t support AH.
You hate women even if you are a woman if you don’t support AH.
Their evidence is from the UK trial, evidence that was disproved in court, or audio recordings that somehow are in Amber’s favour even though it’s all just Amber justifying her abuse of Johnny or verbally abusing him.
If you don’t support AH, you deserve to either; die, be assaulted, be told to KYS, and more “great” things should be done to you.
If, IF they admit AH hit Johnny, it’s because it was reactive somehow, even though she was the one to chase him around just to continue fights and to hurt him.
If they’re a neutral, they think the abuse was mutual for some crazy reason.
The probability of them being a radfem is strong.
Misogyny is allowed towards Kate Moss, Camille Vasquez, and anyone that isn’t AH.
Men are not human to some of them. In fact, men deserve this according to some.
You “obviously” want to fuck Johnny Depp if you support him. No other reason, definitely not because you know he’s a victim, nope.
It’s okay for them to say Johnny Depp deserves to die, that Amber should’ve killed him, or that he should commit unalive, but the minute you say Amber was a POS for what she did, you are the horrible person.
Victim blaming is okay if it’s a man.
Wanting justice for a man, AKA Johnny Depp, is misogynistic.
Male victims don’t exist.
If a woman is abused by a man, they should be allowed to kill that man. If a man is abused by a woman, that man deserved it and the woman shouldn’t be prosecuted.
Misogyny is their favorite word.
If you disagree with them, it’s their cue to tell you to KYS and insult you.
You ARE a misogynist if you support Johnny Depp.
Amber said this and so it is true.
99% of them will not have a respectful conversation with you on why they support her, and that 1% that will be civil WILL be open to the idea that they could be wrong.
They, the AH supporters, are not wrong.
A phycologist diagnosing someone in 12 hours isn’t real unless it’s in Amber’s favour.
You are a narcissist if you eat candy, obviously.
You can supposedly diagnose someone if you watch a movie that features them.
Johnny Depp supporters have NO evidence whatsoever.
Venting about your abuser is okay….unless you are a man.
You beat your child if you support Johnny Depp.
You are an ugly, diseased rodent if you support Johnny Depp.
You are subhuman if you support Johnny Depp.
A women can’t be an abuser, period.
If you are rich, respected by the community, or older than your partner, you obviously are the abuser, even when evidence says otherwise.
It’s not abuse it you are hitting someone older than you.
Johnny Depp chose to have the trial be public so he could humiliate AH, ignore the fact that the judge decided to have it public and Johnny agreed with it.
If you ever sent a text message venting about your abuser, you obviously plan to harm them.
The jury obviously got it all wrong, the reason big named abuse organizations weren’t defending Amber is because they were cowards, and Johnny Depp is gaslighting you.
At this point my brain is starting to melt from how much insanity many of them spew, so I’ll stop. And since we, Johnny Depp supporters, have no evidence according to many of them, here it is ☺️
Added some more points because people pointed out I left some important things out, so I had to remedy that
If you’re wondering about the ones that talk about “the edge,” it’s referring to a pro AH post where the posters said that they’d beat Johnny Depp to the brink of death.
Last week my own family blamed me for my own abuse and now, watching AH supporters say things like this, I literally feel my breakfast about to make a reappearance.
Did we all watch the same trial? Did we all see the same evidence? Hear the same testimonies? See the same fake tears?
She divorced Johnny and won a seven million dollar settlement, won the UK trial and had everyone believing the allegations against Johnny. But instead of donating the money like she said she would and moving on, she decided to write an article (an article that has officially been proven false because all the evidence is against her).
