#domitian
“A terrifying example of alluding to the cult of the dead at a dinner party, however, can be found in the ‘Black Dinner’ given by the emperor Domitian. The evocation was as eerie as the uncertainty as to the Emperor’s message by his evocation.
According to the historian Dio (Epitome 57.9), Domitian invited prominent senators and knights to dinner that was held in an entirely black room that evoked a tomb. Gravestones inscribed with the names of guests and tomb lamps were placed near each guest who reclined on funeral couches. Boys painted black assumed the roles of the guests’ death spirits and sat at their feet as black funeral offerings and sacrifices were served to the guests on black dishes. The emperor alternated between deadly silence and conversation about death as if the guests were already among the dead.
After the dinner, the tombstone and other dinner serving pieces were brought to the homes of the guests, who were expecting imminent death. As though to signal their return to life, however, the boys who had been painted black as their death spirits returned washed and dressed in white.”
Death: Antiquity and Its Legacy by Mario Erasmo, pg. 130.
FORUM ROMANUM VI
TEMPLUM DIVI VESPASIANI
The Temple of the Divine Vespasian was begun by Titus after the death of Vespasian in AD 79, but finished and dedicated by Domitian after the premature demise of Titus in AD 81. Some scholars have hypothesized a dual dedication to both the deified Vespasian and Titus. The inscription on the architrave (recorded in the Einsiedlen Itinerary), however, cited Vespasian only (DIVO VESPASIANO AVGUSTO S. P. Q. R.). The Temple of the Divine Antoninus Pius and Faustina cites both dedicatees in that temple’s surviving inscription, which suggests that Titus would have been mentioned had his cult been established in the same temple as his father’s. The omission of Titus may attributed to Domitian’s hostility towards his brother or to the fact that Titus’ death had been commemorated in the Forum already by the arch bearing his name.
The Temple of the Deified Vespasian is sited in the highly-congested western end of the Forum Romanum, between the Temple of Concordia and the Temple of Saturn. When complete, it nearly abutted the Tabularium and obscured much of its façade. The previous temples of the imperial cult, dedicated to Augustus and Claudius, had been built outside the forum where sufficient land allowed for the construction of imposing edifices. The Flavians, however, chose this chose this cramped space in order to establish a dynastic presence in the Forum. The temple would also serve as a counterweight to the Temple of the Deified Julius Caesar, which stood at the eastern end of the Forum, and to the other monuments built by the Julio-Claudians. The site did have one advantage: located at the foot of the Clivus Capitolinus, the temple was highly visible during triumphs and other civic ceremonies that terminated on the Capitoline Hill.
The temple is hexastyle, prostyle and pseudo-peripteral. It stood on a high, marble faced podium and had a façade orientation. The odd proportions of the temple (33 m x 22 m) were dictated by the area available. The scant physical remains consist of the podium, three fluted Corinthian columns supporting a section of the architrave, and, inside the Tabularium, a large chunk of the entablature.
The latter is virtual compendium of Roman decorative motifs including dentilation, egg and dart, rosette coffering, brackets, and a large frieze depicting bucrania and the implements used by the priests of the temple in the performance of sacrifices. Dense, ostentatious ornamentation is a hallmark of Flavian style, perhaps reflecting desire of the usurping dynasty to project an image of richesse.
A second inscription, also preserved in the Einsiedeln Itinerary, appears on the architrave, the final word of which is still extant:
IMPP. CAESS. SEVERVS ET ANTONINVS PII FELIC[ES] AVGG. RESTITVER[ENT]
Archaeological evidence suggests that the restoration of the temple around AD 200 by Septimius Severus and Caracalla was minor act undertaken for its propagandistic value of linking the Severus to the previous—and highly-admired—usurper, Vespasian.
The temple was largely demolished by Nicholas V as part of his reorganization of the Forum Romanum.
FORUM ROMANUM SERIES
I. Arch of Titus
II. Lacus Juthurnae
III. Arch of Septimius Severus
IV. Tabularium
V. Basilica Iulia
VI. Templum Divi Vespasiani