#e m forster
“Violets ran down in rivulets and streams and cataracts, irrigating the hillside with blue, eddying round the tree stems, collecting into pools in the hollows, covering the grass with spots of azure foam. But never again were they in such profusion; this terrace was the well-head, the primal source whence beauty gushed out to water the earth.”— E. M. Forster, A Room With a View
Let yourself go. Pull out from the depths those thoughts that you do not understand, and spread them out in the sunlight and know the meaning of them.
– E. M. Forster, A Room with a View
Let yourself go. Pull out from the depths those thoughts that you do not understand, and spread them out in the sunlight and know the meaning of them.
– E. M. Forster, A Room with a View
![](https://64.media.tumblr.com/5339375a30c901334165e3c685f6b59f/4e260c8d578cc2f8-54/s640x960/722aeaa71afc8b05b56537e511ba0d0e0cd0d688.jpg)
They had never struggled, and only struggle twists sentimentality and lust together into love.
(based on an illustrated cover of Brideshead Revisited from the 80s)
‘You do care a lot about something, Hall, but it obviously isn’t the Trinity’
pathemata: Here’s the Maurice art I mentioned for the passage you quoted in your Risley/Maurice/Clive punting gifset yesterday.
Maurice Hall and Clive Durham,Maurice by E. M. Forster (1971): art by Dakota. Part of a 20 Nov 2010 post at thedoodlewall.blogspot (the artist’s joint personal art blog).
Artist’s notes: ‘This was a project for class, where we had to take some dialogue and avoid drawing talking heads, and make it interesting with panels and stuff. I took my dialogue from Maurice by E.M. Forster, which is always in my favorite 3 books. The whole book encapsulates exactly how I felt figuring out I was gay, dealing with religion, growing up, and it was written by Forster in the 19th century but hidden until the 70’s. It’s so romantic too. Oh man.’
(Book-canon art, so it’s black-haired Maurice and blond Clive.)
This is absolutely terrific! The look on Clive’s face in that last panel - he really was fond of this blundering creature.
Thanks for sharing!
Post link
Alec being kissed and lifted off the ground mid-kiss, his arm wrapped around Maurice.
So many scenes in gorgeous film I had to go back and view again (and again and again)
I remember reading from James Wilby that this scene was actually filmed on only day three or four , so they didn’t really even know each other!
They had dinner at a restaurant and spoke on everything but that scene.. James asked “do you think we should just go for it?” And, in Rupert’s typical, wonderful fashion, he just said “yup” and they did it.. James’ actual quote was along the lines of “he stuck his tongue down my throat, and that was the end of that!”
(Rupert also caused the bed to break in the other scene… Good Lord..)
Maurice as a book will always be my favourite and the film was bloody fantastic too! The cast were gorgeously chosen and suited the characters perfectly. Forster would have been so proud.. I even have a tattoo of Forster himself I just love it all
(And this kissing scene at the end makes me cry so much because we didn’t get that in the book, but it was so beautiful I’ve never been more happy that they strayed from the novel )
![](https://64.media.tumblr.com/d75f9fd8c395a7df8034e3e0c425f351/e343aa02dcfac7b4-8d/s640x960/c5d2e7db05864277aee91636a59836a197fbf4d5.jpg)
Photography by Global Annihilation
I seem fated to pass through the world without colliding with it or moving it — and I’m sure I can’t tell you whether the fate’s good or evil. I don’t die — I don’t fall in love. And if other people die or fall in love they always do it when I’m just not there.
~E. M. Forster
woonil-razlib-deactivated202205:
“There’ve only been two fine days. And one fine night”, he added mischievously, surprising himself.
—E. M. Forster, Maurice
“What is fictitious in a novel is not so much the story as the method by which thought develops into action, a method which never occurs in daily life… . History, with its emphasis on external causes, is dominated by the notion of fatality, whereas there is no fatality in the novel; there, everything is founded on human nature, and the dominating feeling is of an existence where everything is intentional, even passions and crimes, even misery.
In daily life we never understand each other, neither complete clairvoyance nor complete confessional exists. We know each other approximately, by external signs, and these serve well enough as a basis for society and even for intimacy. But people in a novel can be understood completely by the reader, if the novelist wishes; their inner as well as their outer life can be exposed. And this is why they often seem more definite than characters in history, or even our own friends; we have been told all about them that can be told; even if they are imperfect or unreal they do not contain any secrets, whereas our friends do and must, mutual secrecy being one of the conditions of life upon this globe.
~ E.M. Forster,Aspects of the Novel
the reason why maurice makes me so emotional is that E M Forster wrote it in 1913, knew that it couldn’t be published, held on to it for years and sent it only to his friends, and then after his death Christopher Isherwood, another gay writer made the effort to get it published….and then in 1987 it was directed by another gay man…and now hearing the dedication ‘to a happier year" read out by Ben Whishaw, an openly gay man who’s been married for ten years just makes me feel some type of insane way.
See Maurice(James Ivory, 1987) on the big screen! For free! On a Saturday! At the British Museum!
Online pre-booking advised. And you’ll need to get up early: Maurice is on at 10.45am!
It’s part of a day of free movies exploring love and marriage in the context of LGBT cinema, co-organised by London’s LGBT Camden Forum. The others are Flames of Passion (Richard Kwietniowski, 1989), Small Town Gay Bar (Malcolm Ingram, 2006) and Cloudburst (Thom Fitzgerald, 2011).
Post link
![loading](images/loading.gif)