#feminism q and a

LIVE

Anonymous asked: I read your post on the problematic elements of the first season of AHS, and while I agree with a lot of what you said, there’s been something I’ve been wondering about. (My apologies if you’ve gotten a question like this before.) Zacharty Quinto is a gay man portraying a gay man on the show, so don’t you think if he had a problem with the stereotypes he would’ve said something or maybe even backed out of the project? It reminds of when Jordan Gavaris (of Orphan Black) said that straight people-

-would tell him that his portrayal of Felix was very stereotypical and that if they were gay, they would’ve been offended by it. But he then said that response he’d gotten from the gay community had been very positive. I don’t really know where I’m going with this but do you sort of understand what I’m saying? We don’t want all minority characters in media to be represented in stereotypical ways, but the reason we have these stereotypes is because some of them hold true for some people, right?

And it seems like (at least some) people in the gay community are ok with it? Or at least don’t find it to be terribly offensive? I’m not trying to excuse it or anything, these were just some thoughts I had and I wanted to know what you thought of them. Sorry this message was so long and it probably doesn’t make much sense. I really love your blog and appreciate all the effort you put into it. Thank you :)

Hi! Thanks for your question and for reading my blog. It’s answered below the cut! 

So I completely understand what you’re asking, but first I need to do a quick intervention on the “the reason stereotypes exist is because they’re true for some people” line of reasoning, which is super problematic. Stereotypes aren’t born from an averaging of the common traits of a group of people, they’re made by people in positions of power who want you to think that all people in a marginalized community behave a certain way in order to most easily identify, group, and oppress them. So say like the stereotype of the melodramatic, feminized gay man - that wasn’t created because the majority of men who identify as gay behave as such, it was created by heterosexual men who want to be able to say “this is what a gay man is like - I have no obligation to get to know him beyond that, to recognize him as a person, or to understand that he is a human being just like I am”. Basically, stereotypes are a way to deny humanity to marginalized people by presuming that you know what they are and how they will behave based on narratives they do not write themselves.

So, all that said - I can’t really speak to Felix’s character as I haven’t yet seen Orphan Black, but in terms of Zachary Quinto’s character on AHS, I understand what you mean. However, it’s  important to remember a couple of things - first, actors do not have ultimate power over what is written for their characters. Quinto could have signed on without really knowing what Murphy (who is also gay) would write for that character. Second, actors are people too and people need jobs. While I don’t think Quinto suffers from any dearth of roles, many actors from other marginalized communities, such as Black actors and especially Black women, are probably getting far fewer opportunities because there are fewer parts written for or offered to Black actors. So if we had, lets say, a Black women playing a part that was very poorly written and drew heavily on stereotypes of Black womanhood, it’s pretty unfair to hold her accountable and say “oh well if this was going to be offensive to your community you should have quit”. They may not have the luxury to quit, they may not want to for fear of not getting other jobs, or they may not be offended by the part at all - no one individual can be the spokesperson for their entire community. People of the same group are offended by different things. Quinto could have absolutely zero problem with the role, or he could have hated it but done it anyway. There’s no way of knowing.

The same goes for the fans; some gay fans may have adored Felix’s character, while others found him offensive. Some people may appreciate having gay representation in their media but at the same time wish it was better written - there’s plenty of room for nuance here, and representation is a complicated issue. I would say the best solution to this is to stop writing lazy characters based on stereotypes and have equal representation for marginalized communities on television. 

I hope this answers your question! Thanks so much for reading the blog. 

Anonymous asked:
Could you do a full post on Girls? I stopped watching during the first season but am pretty interested in how it played out considering its rave reviews.

i love what you said about Girls and, if you could, I would love a post talking more about this show. ^^
Oh Girls. I spend a lot of my time just like staring off into the distance muttering under my breath about Girls and what a travesty it is. So yes friends, ask and you shall receive! Here is a breakdown of what I see as some of the biggest issues in Girls (trigger warnings for rape, mental illness, and racism!).
As I’ve said elsewhere, one of the most offense things about Girls is how much credit Lena Dunham gets for being a breakthrough feminist visionary, which is genuinely ridiculous. If Lena Dunham is the feminist voice of our generation I genuinely do not want to be associated with feminism or with my generation (remember that time she seriously asked Twitter if she should think Johnny Depp's portrayal of Tonto in The Lone Ranger was offensive?). It also really frustrates me that when people criticize Lena Dunham she always plays this card of being like “oh they just can’t handle a non-size zero woman enjoying sex on TV!” which, like, yes there are probably people who are sizeist and have a problem with that, but there are also very serious criticisms coming from within the feminist community that she just blatantly ignores. So my biggest problems with Girls in a nifty list -
  1. Racism - This has been said about a million times by writers far more insightful than me, but it is utterly absurd to write a show about New York City and cast only white actors. Has Lena Dunham ever been too New York? I don’t understand. Also, to cast a show that you bill as capturing the experience of post-grad girls in America and then cast three very white, very privileged young women is offensive. It’s just very clear that Lena Dunham only values telling stories about the way straight, upper middle class/upper class white women see the world. Also, they so clearly cast Donald Glover as an attempt to answer the accusations about whitewashing and then only kept him around for one, horribly painful episode. Huge waste of his talent and of an opportunity to be less awful. Honestly far more insightful bloggers than I have written extensively on the whitewashing in Girls, and this is probably the most well discussed aspect of the show so I’ll just leave it here. 
  2. Rape apology - This was one of the most off-putting things about the show to me. In season 2, Adam Sackler rapes his current girlfriend. For a brief glimmer of a moment I actually dared to believe that the show was going to address consent and rape inside relationships, which is rarely discussed or portrayed on TV. All my dreams died, of course, in the next episode, which a) didn’t say a word about the rape and seemed completely content to ignore it and b) valorized Adam as a beacon of masculinity by portraying him as the literal savior of Hannah. She calls him crying (more on this later) and he literally runs across the city to reach her, then carries her out of the apartment in his arms. By immediately placing Adam back in this cliched pose of heroic masculinity, Girls not only ignored the rape, but glamorized the perpetrator, which is frankly unforgivable. But then, it got even better when Lena Dunham excused the scene saying to the LA Times “But I don’t think Adam is a villain. If he thought he had even touched the R-word, he would be unable to live. To me, it seemed like a terrible miscommunication between two people who didn’t know what they really wanted”. Ah yes, that’s exactly how we should explain rape, thank you, Lena. 
  3. Classism - The show is also rooted in inherently classist and privileged ideals. Like one of Hannah’s biggest concerns is that her parents are going to stop funding her after college, despite the fact that she refuses to get a job (not even like she can’t get a job so her parents need to support her. She just genuinely doesn’t want to work in anything but writing). That’s such a privileged problem to have it’s ridiculous. And Jessa’s entire character is rooted in her ability to take off and travel the world and go appropriate other cultures. 
  4. Mental illness - I was also really appalled by the portrayal of Hannah’s mental illness in the second season. It was played as one of her “awkward” traits for laughs and wasn’t adressed as a serious issue by any of the characters. It also romanticized mental illness by setting up a season finale in which Hannah, in the throes of a breakdown, has to be saved by Adam. It’s dangerous and dismissive. 

So basically, I want women in the media to root for, but Lena Dunham is just not one of those women. 

Anonymous asked:

i just saw one of your posts as a background of tumblr’s opening page ^^ ok sounds weird ok ilu bye

Oh my god whattt??? Which post? Wow! Thank you so much for coming to tell me it totally made my day (I had a boring day, ok?). Thanks nonny I love you too come hang out let’s be buds. 

Anonymous asked:
Hey! I was just wondering if you’ve ever seen Gilmore Girls and, if you have, what your thoughts on it are.

Anonymous asked:
Hi. I was just wondering what your take on Under The Dome is. I really like it but I just want someone else’s opinion on it.

Anonymous asked:
I’d be interested in what you think of Scandal!

I’m so sorry, I haven’t seen any of those shows! I’m going to watch Scandal soon though I hear Kerry Washington’s character is one of the best things to happen to tv in awhile! 

A handful of anon questions! 

Anonymous asked:

i just fucking love you.

 (◕‿◕✿) - I love you too anon!

Anonymous asked:

How do you feel about the reality MTV show “Girl Code”? (Personally it’s one of my favourite reality shows because they get a whole bunch of different female comedians and ask them about their personal opinions on different social topics.)

I’ve never seen it!!! I will check it out though, thanks for the recommendation!

Anonymous asked:

have you watched/plan to watch orphan black? it is a pretty feminist show, although it does have problematic content (such as race representation), but there are a lot of badass women and queer characters c:

I’m going to start it as soon as I finish Friday Night Lights! Thanks!

Anonymous asked:

You’re amazing :D

(✿ ♥‿♥) - Thanks!

Anonymous asked:
So for your Orange is the New Black post, what makes you believe that ACCURATELY represents prison life? And what makes you think that american prisons are inhumane (compared to all over the world–or in general)? I don’t know you at all, so I’m just asking what your authority to say such things is, and what authority your sources have. I’ve seen some of the show and it does seem well written and emotional. I’m not hating on the show at all.
I would recommend doing some research, perhaps starting with the ACLU Incarceration website, on the fact that the US incarcerates its citizens at a higher rate than any other comprable nation, the fact that prison overcrowding has been declared a violation of human rights in the United States, or the testimony of countless incarcerated/formerly incarcerated individuals who have spoken out about the horrific and often gendered and/or racialized abuse they experienced in prison. 
Anonymous asked:
please review Ugly Betty if you have time!
I’m sorry, I haven’t seen it!!!
Anonymous asked:
I know i insist in Veronica Mars (is really a good show, haha) but i have to talk about it again, in the show Veronica is drugged and raped (not spoiler, it is in the firsts episodse) and that is used as character development and i think is very well used. She was in a party and has no idea who rapped her (she keeps searching for who it was) and when she try to tell the police, they blame her, for being in a party and that drunk. Also there’s another rapes plots on season 3
Hello! I promise I’m going to watch Veronica Mars one of these days! I will be interested to see how they handle all that, I’ve heard it relies pretty heavily on rape as a backstory. Hopefully I will be able to do a post on it soon! Thanks!!
Anonymous asked:
What are your thoughts on women of color representation on TV? Like for example the lack of them on a show like Girls. Or annoying stereotypes like the sassy black girl or token minority?
Hello! I mean, I think the first and foremost problem is that there just aren’t enough roles for women of color on television. There is a radical under-representation of people of color in literally every genre of TV. Shows like Girls just erase the existence of women of color (and people of color in general - Donald Glover was in it for about eight minutes and now Lena Dunham expects some ally cookies or something). I’m also 200% done with “historically accurate” casting, on shows like Game of Thrones or The Borgias. There’s this incredible idea that people of color didn’t exist in history and shouldn’t be cast in these kind of shows, which is a) completely untrue and an invention of white supremacist historians and b) a completely stupid excuse for not “having to try” to be inclusive. Use your history/fantasy world-creation powers for good, people.
The second problem is that when roles are written for women of color, they’re often written by white men (who make up most of the television industry) and are therefore both dramatically underwritten and rely heavily on stereotypes/tropes. So I think there definitely needs to be a dual movement in the industry towards more inclusive writing that makes space for POC characters and shifts in the demographics of writers and executives! 

loading