#reckoning
Everwood (TV Series) - S4/E19, ‘Reckoning’ (2006)
Charles Durning as Eugene Brown
[photoset #2 of 2]
Post link
Non-mainstream RPGs Deserve Your Love Too
The last few years have seen RPGs rise higher and higher, with The Elder Scrolls, Mass Effect, Fallout and Red Dead Redemption all taking out numerous game of the year awards. Despite the action adventure titles and shooters still scattered around, and the odd puzzle game like Portal 2 spicing things up a bit, the RPGs still seem to be the ones getting everyone’s attention. With the fires of Skyrim being rekindled periodically with the DLC packages, it might be hard for a more mainstream gamer to branch out into slightly murkier territory, but there are plenty of amazing stories to be told if you just look a little deeper than the top 10.
I’ve spent the last few weeks playing Dragon’s Dogma and despite getting solid reviews almost across the board, virtually none of my friends have played it and it’s getting almost no attention on the major gaming sites. I never know if these things are due to my habit of playing games to completion and as such waiting a few months to play new games (I still have Dishonored and Borderlands 2 wrapped up nicely and ready to play!) or if people have genuinely missed out on it.
For those that aren’t aware of it, it basically plays like a more accessible version of Dark Souls, keeping the epic, challenging encounters with enormous enemies and minimal hand-holding without resorting to insane difficulty spikes and needless complexity (hydra boss fight, I’m looking at you – if the game doesn’t give me any indication that I need to find the giant crow so that I can go back to the prologue level to get an item that lets me walk in knee-deep water, chances are excellent I’m not going to head back there). There’s a touch of Shadow of the Colossus in some of the bigger enemies, and while scaling a chimera is not quite on the same scale as the SotC bosses, you still feel a sense of achievement when it comes crashing down.
The world is richly detailed and enormously expansive (though the lack of reliable fast travel may be a turn-off to some), and the versatility within the combat is outstanding. The pawn system is just icing on an already delicious cake, allowing you to bring minions built by other players into your realm to aid you in your journey, in addition to giving you the chance to craft a permanent companion of your own. The game has some flaws, yes; graphically it struggles at times and the voice acting is not outstanding, occasionally not even close to synching up with the mouth movements. Yet despite everything it has to offer, it hasn’t managed to break into the top tier of best-selling games. Why?
Another victim of this is Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning. While mostly known today for the abrupt and messy dissolution of its parent company, it did an excellent job of crafting a detailed backstory and creating an entirely new world without relying too heavily on existing fantasy tropes (while fae and elves abound, I don’t think anyone was prepared for the crudok).
I honestly think the main reason these games aren’t talked about any more is not because of any shortcomings on their part, but due predominantly to brand loyalty. Even if you avoided the advertising, it’s hard to overlook something like Skyrim if you’ve played anything else in the series and enjoyed it, and the games have been around long enough to have garnered enough loyal fans to survive. It’s almost impossible for a new game series to build up enough of a following to convince people that it’s worth investing in a sequel. One of the only RPGs in recent memory I can think of where a sequel didn’t expand and improve on the first game was Dragon Age II, which, while offering much the same as the original, was still an enjoyable game to play. I think looking at sales of Call of Duty over the years, it seems apparent that gamers are willing to buy a very similar game again and again if it comes from their trusted favourite developers.
I guess all I can ask is that you skim over the best-sellers of the month and have a look at the games off to the side. Gaming for me is all about uncovering and delighting in new experiences, so dive in and you might find something truly memorable.
Post link
While on our way to see
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
we did a couple of more WWE pick-ups!
We made it into series 90+
and we picked up a
WWE Elite Series 90 Reckoning
and a
WWE Elite Series 91 Bianca Belair
Which is awesome I think
I like them both so I was
happy to get them of course.
What the actual hell, y’all? Nothing to see here, except Katherine Hepburn giving us all the look that makes our collective gay insides instantly clench up then immediately liquefy.
What is that gut incinerating reaction? I can’t say for sure, but I have been thinking about it a lot, and I’m going to offer 3 possible suggestions:
Attraction(obviously).
But there are many levels to attraction. There’s like a woman walks by and turns your head attraction, or A-list celebrity beautiful-person attraction, and then there’s THIS. This feeling I’m talking about goes so far beyond the “you’re attractive” sort of attraction to like “laws of physics” sort of attraction. The kind of attraction that registers not just inside your core but also psyche.
It messes with my head in ways that have turned me around ever since I was old enough to be aware of such things, and I’ve come to sum it up as “The great queer question.”
Do I want to be with you, or do I want to beyou?
It’s hard when you’re young (or even not so young) and you’re hungry for role models, but also thirsty for something else. And the whole issue gets complicated by the way those two feelings register in similar places of your body. The first time you see a woman step into full ownership of her God-given gift of giving zero fucks for conformity it lights a fire in the deepest regions of your gut. And as the warmth spreads outward from that low guttural place it can cause things to heat up in areas right below your core, too. You know the ones I mean, right? Those body parts are very close together, sometimes it’s hard to separate the two types of attraction.
And I’ve made peace with that, the not always knowing which came first, or which takes precedent, because ultimately it doesn’t matter. As fun as it can be (and by fun, I clearly mean disorienting) to try to figure out if I want to be with someone or be like someone, I am non-binary enough to realize the answer can be, and often is:
Attraction and aspiration are both cool, they’re both fluid, and they totally intersect. I’m comfortable with that. I’m more than comfortable with it. I dig it.
So if there’s no great conflict around attraction, why should that photo of ole K. Hep and her butchly furrowed brow still make my tummy so. damn. squimbly? Could it be something deeper than attraction? Something more complex? Something more elemental? Something like…
Recognition.
You see, over the last few years I’ve gotten into the concept of ancestral echoes, or the idea that memories and the knowledge that comes from them can be passed down through our DNA. That you can, on some level, know about things you’ve never experienced for yourself, and you can recognize the same sort of knowledge in other people.
Example: Folks way back up my family tree were sea-faring explorers. It’s been like 15 generations and I am super susceptible to sea sickness, but I am still so drawn to boats and the ocean. Not just like I find them pretty, but like I’m freaking Moana or something. There’s a pull there that goes beyond all reason and logic. I know that if I get on a sailboat there’s decent chance I am going to lose my lunch, but I can’t stay away. Even as I go green in the gills and my stomach does summersaults a part of me is still like:
I feel the same inexplicable connection when I look at that picture of Katherine Hepburn. There is a gay DNA level kind of recognition. A big queer ancestral echo. Whatever part of me that makes me gay senses its mirror in her.
Now I don’t know what part of me that is, nor what part of her trips that recognition trigger for me. The insolent stare? The turn of the mouth? Those gay AF eyebrows?
I’m not sure, but I feel certain it would exist even if I didn’t know the words gay or DNA. Something queer in me honors something queer in her. It’s inborn, liike gaydar on steroids boiled down to its most primal level. It runs through the generations on double helix rainbows. It vibrates across my chromosomes humming through the lowest, most animal regions of my brain.
Iknowyou.
We are the same. Whatever this thing is, it builds an unbreakable bond. A shared ..something. Brotherhood is too gendered. Personhood too vague. A queersterhood. A … wait for it … Listerhood?
You didn’t really think I’d make it through this gay ass therapy session without her did you?
Well I didn’t, because I can’t. I am physically incapable of looking away from this paragon of queer top perfection. And while I get that this is exactly the point where I should be able to tie this post up neatly on some note about our foremothers of the past living on through our legacy, that’s not going to happen.
As much as I would like to have some spiritual or academic conclusion for the things I feel when I see this, I don’t.
Nothing about my reaction is academic, or hypothetical or high minded.
I’ve looked these photos it so many times, trying to figure out what is bigger than attraction and deeper than recognition, and there’s only one word that comes close to capturing the experience for me:
Reckoning.
Reckoning involves looking something in the eye and taking stock of it and you at the same time. It involves taking weight and measures, taking inventory of your totality, and checking receipts on the things both utterly unquantifiable and yet indisputable.
And when I look at those women, I am forced to reckon with a fundamental truth:
They are better tops than me.
Katherine Hepburn is a better top than me. Ann Lister (as played by Suranne Jones) is a better top than me. There’s no way around it.
No matter how much I like to think I have some natural predication for topness, they have more. Clearly.
Sometimes you look at someone and you just know they know things. Things you are desperate to know. They possess a command and understanding you do not possess. They have skills you can only, and probably only ever will, aspire to.
I am not ashamed to admit it. It’s just the natural order of things. Did Joe DiMaggio feel shame at not being Babe Ruth? Or for you non-sportsball people, does Lizzo feel ashamed for not being Aretha Franklin? I hope not. There’s no shame in having your greatness fall just below that of divine master. Not everyone can be the GOAT. I’m okay with that. It’s not a competition. I don’t need to best anyone.
But I do need to make peace with that reckoning in other ways. Like a wolf who just met the new pack leader, or pirate captain whose ship just got overrun, there’s a new world older that must be acknowledged in those moments. There is a hierarchy of tops and topness, and it’s just been indisputably altered.
I am not the top top, not even in my own mind. I can’t ignore it, I am the one who acknowledged it in the first place. I could run from it. At least in theory. I could look away, close my eyes, or banish those understandings to vast reaches of the unfollowed internet, but I am not a coward.
As fluid as I am, and as secure as I am in who I am, I can feel gratitude at the the opportunity to look upon greatness. To indulge my awe. To relish my vast appreciation of the most transcendent of beings.
And then, of course, as is only right, I feel compelled to roll over. Honestly, I don’t know how anyone could feel compelled to do anything other than roll over when they look at that picture. That is the great tremble in my gut: it is all the scripts being flipped.
Does that make me a lesser top? Maybe. Does that make me a bottom? Perhaps sometimes. Does that bother me?
Not at all.
Cause really, what’s the use of recognizing a hierarchy to tops, if you don’t intend to enjoy every possible aspect of your own position on that spectrum?
