#sex workers rights
look not to be a bitch about this, but since people love to not fucking read, the people claiming the backpage indictment makes no mention of trafficking are wrong. the document is available in full here (csa warning at the link), and in paragraph 162 it makes specific mention of the trafficking-related charges in paragraphs 1-161. as the founders did not themselves transport or coerce anyone, they are not being charged under the actual trafficking acts, but ARE being charged with a plethora of trafficking-related shit under the travel act. i just fail to see what help obfuscating this fact does anyone advocating backpage as a resource for sex workers.
It’s that time again–I’m soliciting submissions for Tits and Sass, the blog by and for sex workers which I co-edit. How do you feel Trump’s presidency is affecting sex workers–migrant sex workers, Latinx sex workers, Muslim sex workers? We especially welcome pieces by and interviews with migrant sex workers themselves. What should the sex workers’ rights movement do to participate in the resistance, and how is that participation made more difficult by exclusionary gestures against us like the recent fiasco over the Women’s March document? How are we as sex workers adapting to the Backpage closure? Any commentary on BP CEO and shareholders’ continuing battle against California pimping charges against them and their next court date on Thursday? And, as always, reviews of sex work related media, personal essays with universal significance, and analysis of movement issues are always welcome. Pseudonymity and confidentiality is guaranteed, and we’re always eager to help beginner writers hone their craft. Email me at [email protected]!