#sorry i know its april
a-wonderful-use-of-server-space:
Okay, I’m just gonna say it: I find it really interesting how “groomer” became the new exclusionist buzzword about ten seconds after it became the hot new right-wing slur for queer folks.
It’s not that the accusations are new - they’ve been calling everyone they disagree with pedos for ages now.But theshift in language?That’sextremely recent. And, IMO, revealing.
They’re freebasing fascism and they don’t even know it.
Ah yes because also wanting cishet folk to not do the same shit in public totally makes me queerphobic. Makes me, a jew, a facist for not wanting children to see full on kink.
Collars and masks and stuff that isn’t blatantly sexual is fine. But flogging and other shit, which is the example been brought up, is not okay from anyone, cishet or not.
#1: The kink at pride discourse? You could really just say “I’ve never attended a pride parade and open queer sexuality scares me,” and get the exact same point across
#2: Holy mother of God do you actually think fascism is the opposite of Judaism? That is a UNIQUE take.
I’m stuck on “flogging is an explicit sex act.” Far more extreme violence is in every piece of popular media, news and sports in the US. Because that’s not what sex is and that’s not how sex works.
Even if I give the benefit of the doubt that something we often see in children’s cartoons is “blatant sex” because of the implications of the setting? People don’t flog each other in all-ages areas!!
Places where children are expected as part of Pride do not have active kink demonstrations. This person is just making up bullshit about how The Nasty Queers Are Sexually Abusing Children and somehow thinks that’s progressive??
