even if it’s a step relative, i believe it’s still legally considered incest
holy fucking shit
The transcult is like a dummy corporation…they’re covering for- and enabling sexual predators under the guise of being a “progressive”, “feminist”, “woke” civil rights movement.
“they felt people were unjustly picking on him by bringing up his conviction as a violent child rapist, a historyTHRI believed was no longer relevant.”
Hell world, in which women’s pain and children’s pain pale in comparison to a man’s demands. This man should’ve never seen freedom again. Instead his “history” is seen as irrelevant.
Something about “woke language” that fascinates me is that although it’s aim is to be inclusive and not offensive, it more often than not does the exact opposite. At best it’s comical and at worst it’s downright dehumanizing. So like for example you could have someone making commentary on race relations and use “white people” and then refer to people of colour as “black and brown bodies” in the same sentence. I had a friend of mine invite me to a “gender inclusive” group thing on Facebook and group said it was open to “men and non men”. So now I as a black woman am both subsequently a “black body and a non man”. My femaleness and my humanity are nonexistent. Not to mention that unless you’re deep in the trenches of this progressive shit, this nebulous language is very confusing and generally inefficient
It just completely blows my mind that people use these terms in the same sentence and not see anything wrong with it. Like what is their justification for saying something like “open to both men and non-men”????
Having a gender non conforming (GNC) character who is a masculine woman or feminine man, will alwaysbe far more valuable and important than having a GNC character that is “nonbinary”. It shows viewers that there are many ways to be a woman or man, not that stepping outside of traditional gender roles renders you not actually a woman or man at all. It fights against gender roles, instead of just creating new ones.
You will never see me assuming that a GNC woman isn’t a woman, or that a GNC man isn’t a man, because that assumption is sexist and regressive, as it implies that there is only a certain degree that a woman can be GNC before she’s no longer a woman, and that there is only a certain degree that a man can be GNC before he’s no longer a man. It’s a strict enforcing of gender roles, and that doesn’t change just because you slap they/them pronouns on it.
“…THAT STEPPING OUTSIDE OF TRADITIONAL GENDER ROLES RENDERS YOU NOT ACTUALLY A WOMAN OR MAN AT ALL”
There was a Saturday Night Live skit that aired when I was in high school (mid-’90s), where there was a guy joining a college dorm room occupied by three women, where he intended to live with them– and he said “No, see, I’m a woman.” Where he was obviously a guy, and it was obvious that he wanted to live there so he could perv on the women there. Ex., he kept saying stuff like “So when are we all going to take off all our clothes and get into a pillow fight in our underwear?” Then he put a poster up on the wall of a woman in a bikini, and when the women asked about this he said “Oh that’s my cousin, I hate her, because she’s so thin.”
And back when this skit aired the absurdity was clear to the audience: it’s obviously a guy, who is obviously claiming to be a woman so he can perv on the women living there - while the women can’t say or do anything about it and are clearly uncomfortable.
If this was obvious to audiences in the ‘90s then it’s obvious to audiences today too– and yet nowadays the current fashion is to pretend that we don’t see what’s obviously going on, and to pretend that a guy like this is legitimately a woman, and anyone questioning him is bigoted.
every time i hear someone claim transwomen have it so much worse, i think of the time i was put in psychiatric inpatient and tried to ask to be assigned to a female room, and they misunderstood my dissociated ass saying “i’m female” and thought i was mtf. (i’m ftm.) they were immediately extremely apologetic for putting me in the male half of the ER, made sure to ask if i had a preferred name, and multiple people assured me i’d be housed with a female roommate. then i get sent over, undress so the nurse can take note of any injuries, and she goes, “wait, your papers say you’re male-to-female?” i say, “no no, i was born female. i want to be put in a female room because i have a history of sexual trauma with males and haven’t had any surgeries.” and all of a sudden i’m getting told i’m not allowed in a female room, called “it” by the nurse checking in my belongings, and asked if i want access to razors for shaving my face and legs. “afab privilege” my ass lol.
r/ftm about damage from binding, all posted within the past year.
Binding is not safe. I was only on testosterone for 3 months and was relatively unscathed, but I was binding for a year and a half, 6-8 hours a day (what is considered “safe binding practice”). and that also may not sound like a lot of time, but I cannot wear bras anymore, over 2 years after I stopped binding. not even wireless, soft bralettes because if i wear one my ribs hurt and i have shooting pains when I breathe.
“I have noticed that the genderqueer fandom is misogynistic, it’s legitimiately hurting my life as a woman in misogynistic ways, and I feel like a terrible person for daring to talk about this. Oh no, now the horrible terf monsters have reblogged my post to prove their point which is exactly what I said!”
Assume there are two identical twins, both AMAB. When they grow up, one of them comes out as a no-op (no operation/surgeries) trans woman. Why, exactly, would a lesbian be attracted to the trans woman and not the other brother?
Conversation, getting to know each other, personality traits.
as a lesbian i’m offended by the implication that we’re only attracted to a woman’s body, op.
you’re so fucking stupid lmao sexuality is reliant on a person’s sex. it’s not like “oh im only attracted to skinny bodies” or “oh im only attracted to boobs” it’s about what biological category you form sexual / romantic attraction to. quit deliberately misunderstanding what OP is saying just because you don’t believe homoSEXUALITY (not “gender-uality”) exists.
how is this any different from homophobes saying that homosexuals should date the opposite sex for their personality, shaming them for “not being open enough”? because ive seen that one countless times.
Isn’t it funny how… the entire pornography industry… very specifically denigrates, dehumanizes, and degrades almost exclusively one biological sex for audiences to get off to… without expecting audiences to “have conversations with” or “get to know” or “learn about the personality traits” of those in their videos…?
Like can you imagine if 50% of porn featured biological males and just in the title it said “these are women because they identify as women,” and expected the vast, encompassing masses of straight biological males in their audiences to be like “oh okay, I guess I’ll judge by their personality traits and the fact that this says they identify as females to fap to this”? Gosh, I wonder why this isn’t what’s actually happening? What could it possibly be that keeps the pornography industry degrading and humiliating very specifically only one biological women?
Funny how clear the distinction suddenly becomes about what causes attraction when it comes to treating biological women like garbage.
(Ps, don’t be on to me about the tiny percentage of porn where males have had surgery and posed as women, as this is not representative of what the pornography industry does on the whole - either way, if it’s based on personality traits and getting to know each other then why would the surgery be necessary to begin with?)
It’s so funny that a TERF saw a post talking about how TERF ideals are Neonazi ideals and instead of trying to refute that with an actual argument they jumped straight to “I’m a Jewish TERF so OP is an antisemite for calling me a neonazi >:(”
Like the fucking reach to get there is so funny. I’m sorry your beliefs line up with those of a different hate group but maybe you take a minute to reflect on why that is instead of just… Pointing fingers and spouting nonsense.
Anyway, this is a reminder that if you’re a TERF please block me :) and maybe think about why you let so much hate into your life, it’s really not healthy.
calling jewish people neonazis is a long established antisemite talking point and doing so shows a lack of empathy for victims of the nazi regime and the actual impact of what they did. this isn’t a reach, you just refuse to listen.
I need you to re-read that post real hard and tell me where I calls Jewish people neonazis, sweetheart
hey sweetheart, I see you blocked my friend before he got the chance to call you out so I’m gonna do it instead. you literally started off your post by calling a jewish person a nazi. said jewish person was, in your eyes, a nazi because they are a radical feminist who, in your eyes, are just as bad (if not worse) than nazis. i shouldn’t have to tell you how antisemitic this is. and I may be wrong, but I’m pretty sure nazis weren’t in favour of same sex marriage, abortion or women’s liberation. i also don’t think they were known for being anti prostitution since they ran brothels in the camps. you have no idea what “terf rhetoric” even is. you genuinely do refuse to listen (I know I’m getting blocked for this so thanks for proving my point)
op@yurukiturah I was the “terf” in question, calling radfems as a whole (neo)nazis is yes offensive to Jewish radfems, all around insensitive since many prominent radfem figures (off the top of my head Dworkin and Firestone) were Jewish so it’s an ideology largely created by Jewish women, and also makes light of Nazism
there’s many differences between radical feminist and neonazi talking points but ffs I shouldn’t be expected or required to list them and have a discussion with someone who’s explicitly being AT BEST insensitive and at worst bigoted towards me as an oppressed minority and rude in response to being called out. op of that post literally wasn’t Jewish
see the crucial (tho far from only) difference is that radfems aren’t genocidal. radical feminism doesn’t fundamentally view trans people as lesser humans, and individual radfems who are prejudiced towards trans people and make assumptions about anyone who transitioned do exist (vocal minority) but EVEN they never advocate for trans genocide. never. I’d been in private radfem servers and places like that. “I don’t think you’re a woman” isn’t on par with “you’re subhuman and should be killed”. it’ll never be and it’s simply manipulative to claim it is. and that difference is the basic reason of why it’d be offensive via making light of neonazism even if a lot of radfems WEREN’T Jewish, but we ARE, which makes it even worse.
i was at a bar which had 2 restrooms, one was labeled “gentlemen” and the other was just labelled “restroom” and idk for me i automatically was like “that must be the womens room then? maybe they just messed the sign up” but then saw a man enter the mens room and another man enter the one labelled “restroom” without hesitation. he didnt think “is this the womens room?” all the rooms are for them lol. i think its especially insidious that there is no female only space inside a bar where men can be especially gross. also the walls were plastered with like progressive slogans including a lot of feminist ones which i found very ironic :)
Yet another reason why so many men love modern day feminism: they can gain access to female spaces without losing their own. Bathrooms which have urinals in them remain as men’s bathrooms (being called that or bathrooms with urinals which keeps it as a male space) while women’s spaces become gender neutral.
Men give up nothing with everything to gain; women give up everything with everything to lose.
Final statement that I won’t reply to any TERFs on:
Nothing makes a woman. Nothing makes a man. Asking me “what is a woman” is enforcing that you have a set idea on what makes a woman. I do not.
A woman is a woman. That is all that should matter.
if theres nothing makes a man then you aren’t a man, you realize that right? if there’s no definition of the word man that applies to you, then you literally aren’t a man. you’re misgendering yourself bud.
“a woman is a woman” yes, and women are human females. a word can’t be it’s own definition.
the fact that you can accept your femaleness but not the fact that you’re a woman is peak internalized misogyny. the definition of woman is adult human female, period. there is no other reason nearly every human female refers to themselves as a woman. assuming the vast, vast majority of human females on earth have some metaphysical connection to or magical gender feeling of “woman” is blatant misogyny. do you think we all think alike and identify as women based on our shared affinity for the word? considering the expectations and subjugation of women under the patriarchy, do you really think most human females identify with the connotations of the word woman? why would it be anything but a neutral description of our sex.
i hope you grow out of this and realize women (human females) are an incredibly diverse category with different feelings, thoughts, and identities that share the experience of being female, not the “feeling” of womanhood.
Tired of people who are “I don’t see color” about women. You can’t make laws on the definition of woman being “is a woman.” You can’t protect women as a class if you can’t identify who belongs to that class. You can’t address misogyny or call out misogyny as misogyny if you don’t identify who the target of misogyny is.
“A woman is a woman.” Ok but what’s a woman?
Isn’t it funny how “there is no definition for what makes a woman a woman,” but they know exactly who to fap to in porn?
And they know exactly who to call a Karen and a bitch?
And the know exactly who they want to silence and beat up?
if you ever need to explain to some dumbass why “menstruator” is an unacceptable term to refer to females, @science-side-of-me just broke it down ever so elegantly in the notes on this post:
Absolute legend
Make the science side of Tumblr relevant again.
You would think that just the fact that males aren’t called “ejaculators” or “spermers” would make it clear enough to the trans fans why calling women “menstruators” isn’t okay.
I couldn’t find that thread specifically, I think it’s been deleted or removed because of the amount of attention it got, but I found some other stuff from them:
trons maels weare wombyn skin constum to try & b us cuz thay awant a prussiun point & the trancults ltells them tis ok cuz they have “”””””””””””””fmele broan””””””””””””””””””””” lyk thats not the mots seist malarky i have ever herd but u sll fsll 4 it bevzuse ytong id s uclt
