Photo 1 [source]

A photography student’s project: feminist phrase in response to rape culture.

Photo 2 [source]
A baby t-shirt design created by a Intactivist mother.

I’m just going to juxtapoze these two separate messages into one post.
Hey! Two things with the same words! But for completely different reasons! But yet for the same reasons? Dare I say these two things can exist in an overarching theme together? Might it be possible that our culture has some broad issues we have yet to answer, which put these two things into a category?

It’s the removal of choice, it’s the absence of a clearly defined aspects of consent. It’s listening to victims, hearing their stories, and understanding they have had a choice taken away from them. This is happening in the same culture, these issues..

Ladies and gentlemen…Colin Farrell!

[Whole Network.org]

Infant circumcision, aka genital mutilation… just another fucking reminder that the word exceptional in ‘American Exceptionalism’ isn’t necessarily a compliment.

I think circumcision is very hot when it’s chosen by the owner of the penis and not by someone else

WARNING: NON-EROTIC POST / INTACTIVIST POST

just to be clear I definitely oppose non-voluntary child/infant circumcision. the person whose penis it is ought to decide re: cosmetic alterations to their own genitals. However, voluntary adult circumcision or fantasy adult non-voluntary circumcision is really hot.

aaronra13:

The Science of Circumcision

Penisreading all about itself!