nothorses:

“Transandrophobia” Primer

There’s a wild amount of misinformation about the term “transandrophobia” going around, and has been for a long time. So let’s dig in a bit and set the record straight.

What it is

“Transandrophobia” was coined as an alternative to “transmisandry”, and describes the unique oppression targeted at and faced by transmasculine folks (and people perceived to be transmasculine).

Transmascs experience oppression not just on the basis of being trans, or (typically) AFAB, and certainly not on the basis of being men alone. What we experience is unique to being transmasculine, and the way cissexist society categorizes and responds to us: not as women, not as men, but as an “other” that lies between the two.

Some quick examples of transandrophobia:

• Trans men are the most likely group in the trans community to have negative experiences with healthcare providers.
• AFAB trans people in general are most likely to be denied HRT.
• Trans men are most likely to be denied surgery coverage.
• Trans men are most likely to avoid healthcare out of fear.
• Nonbinary people and trans men were most likely to report having never, or only sometimes, been treated with respect by law enforcement.
• Trans men are more likely to experience problems with airport security.
• Trans men are most likely to avoid public restrooms.
• Over half of all AFAB nonbinary people and trans men experience sexual assault. These are the highest rates in the queer community.
• 9 out of every 10 trans men seriously consider attempting suicide. This is the highest rate in the queer community.
• About half of all trans men attempt suicide. This is the highest rate in the queer community.

What it Looks Like

Transmascs are generally placed in one of two categories: confused “girls” they believe can be saved, and evil, dangerous “other” they believe are beyond saving. There’s a ton of overlap in these two categories, both in what they experience, and in the fact that oftentimes the two are experienced simultaneously; even in the same situation.

A quick, incomplete list of how these things can manifest:

• Infantilization (“soft”, “little”)
• Removal of autonomy
• Stereotyping as “whiny”, “hysterical”, or “entitled”.
• “Butch flight” or “ROGD” - the idea that transmascs are stealing butch lesbians.
• Pressuring transmascs to be more feminine/womanly, either through overt force, or through subtler manipulation.
• The desire to “make transmascs women” via sexual assault (corrective rape).
• The idea that testosterone causes aggression; emotional, physical, and sexual- therefore transition is dangerous, and transmascs who transition are dangerous.
• Fearmongering around transmasc transitions; “binders can never be safe”, “vaginal atrophy is untreatable”, “you’ll get fat/ugly/acne/sweaty/oily/smelly”, “phalloplasty is too dangerous/expensive/unsatisfying to be worth it”, etc.
• Medical professionals dissuading transmascs from transitioning; stressing risks that can in actuality be mitigated easily, nitpicking family history without presenting options, etc.
• The idea that transmascs only become trans to “escape misogyny” or to “gain male privilege”.
• Erasure of transmasc experiences, esp. experiences with misogyny and transphobia.
• Lack of resources for transmasc abuse survivors.
• Lack of resources for transmascs in need of reproductive healthcare on the basis of “male” gender markers, names, voices, and appearances.

Why We Call it That

“Transandrophobia” can be broken down in two ways:

1. “Trans” + “androphobia” = the “trans version” of “androphobia”, a fear of men or social bigotry toward men.
2. “Trans-andro” + “phobia” = a social bigotry directly specifically at trans men/transmascs.

The second is the more common interpretation and usage, largely because the first can be interpreted, by some, to mean that those using the word are suggesting that it’s actually (cis) women who oppress (cis) men, that we don’t believe patriarchy exists, etc. This, of course, has never been the intention of the word.

The first break-down above could also be interpreted to refer to patriarchy’s negative stereotyping of men- as aggressive, dangerous, and sexually predatory.

While that doesn’t translate to systemic oppression of cis men, those same feelings- a general disgust and fear toward the concept of manhood- do inform how society responds to transmascs. As a group of people who are oppressed on the basis of being transmasculine, those feelings do play a role in transmasc oppression.

What it Isn’t

“Transandrophobia” is not an attack on, or accusation toward, any other group of people.

The word does not imply that trans women oppress trans men, that transmascs have it worse than anyone else, that transfems are horrible bigots, that transfem issues do not deserve the attention they receive (or, ideally, far more attention than they currently receive).

It does not imply that cis misandry exists, that “MRAs were right”, that patriarchy and misogyny aren’t real, or that feminism isn’t necessary.

It does not signal bigotry toward other groups. Whatever your personal opinion of the word, of who uses it, or of who coined it, the word is a word and it stands alone from those things. It belongs to the transmasculine community.

It does not demand anyone pay any less attention to other important issues. It does not accuse other trans people of oppressing us. It does not dismiss the existence of patriarchy or structural oppression of women. It does not belong to any one individual.

Why We Need it

There are real, tangible issues within the transmasc community- things that are unique to transmascs- and those things happen because of a unique bigotry toward transmasculinity.

In order to address those problems, we have to be able to talk about what they are and why they happen.

In order to talk about that, we need a word for what it is. “Transandrophobia” is that word.

Don’t get me wrong: the word might change at some point, and that’s fine. If the transmasc community as a whole decides that we would like a new word, and creates one together that suits those new needs, that’s fine. But as of now, this is the most common, recognizable, easy-to-understand word we have.

“Transandrophobia” belongs to the transmasc community, and it’s up to transmascs to define, interpret, create or remove associations, revise, and replace, as it sees fit.

What You Can Do

If you’re transmasc:

Talk about your experiences. Connect with other transmascs. Join transmasc community spaces, create new ones, and maintain a positive, productive, and inclusive culture within those spaces. Uplift transmascs with different experiences from you.

Be an ally to other trans people, to people of color, to disabled people, and to other marginalized groups. Do not allow resentment toward the trans community- any part of it, and especially toward transfems- to fester in any space you inhabit.

If you’re not:

Listen to transmascs. Seek transmascs out to listen to. Uplift transmasc voices. Learn. Ask questions, even if they’re scary, and be ready to be surprised by the answers.

Think for yourself. Own your opinions, and own where they’re coming from; don’t blame them on other trans people. Acknowledge your limitations in experience. Know that you don’t need to understand in order to respect us. Try to understand anyway.

haustel:

have to say once more.. bigender people who are both men and women get no respect or consideration cause yall make us just women or just men depending on which one will invalidate our arguments or make us sound like oppressors, and none of yall can figure out how to fit us into your gender politics bc acknowledging us as real men AND real women would require understanding that men and women are not fully different, separate and opposite groups. bigender m+w means you cant group everyone into “men and non-men” and act like these are coherent categories. bigender m+w means you will need to let bigender wlw talk about wlw experiences without painting them as aggressive male intruders, and bigender mlm talk about mlm experiences without painting them as fetishizing straight women. bigender m+w means you cant treat us as if were exclusively men the moment we talk about anything you dont like regarding gender so you can paint us as purely actors of oppression who have never suffered misogyny despite also being women. bigender m+w means you have to rethink how you think gender works and what you believe about nonbinary people aligning themselves with a binary gender meaning theyre just “man lite or woman lite” when some of us are aligned with both binary genders. etc..

anyroads:

As a lot of sewing and costube nerds know, Bernadette Banner just released her book on sewing, a basic guide for sewing and mending based on historical techniques. She has a successful YouTube channel where she teaches these techniques and occasionally features other costubers, experts, etc. Naturally, in writing her book, she’s transferred some of the personal aspects that are part of any YouTube channel’s branding, such as illustrating her work with narratives and introducing the people who are featured in the book.

Because she has used people’s correct pronouns and approached this book in an inclusive way, it seems a group of TERF activists have organized and bombarded the book’s Amazon page with bad reviews, claiming the book has an “agenda” and is “political” by using the preferred pronouns of the people featured. Of course, this is this absurd – YouTube personalities, even those with substantive content who aren’t just influencers, are exactly that? Personalities? So of course there will be personal narratives, and why should someone’s identity be left out of their narrative, especially if the reason they need to tailor a garment is a gender reassignment surgery? I also imagine it may be triggering and difficult, as Banner has an openly non-binary sibling who has also been featured in her videos.

All this to say, you can go to Amazon and report these bigoted reviews or mark them as unhelpful, and if you have a copy of the book and like it, this is a good time to leave a nice review. The book was published less than a month ago, and bad Amazon reviews can tank new publications or push Amazon to force the author to make changes in some cases (though I think only with digital books, but as there’s a kindle edition and we all know that Amazon takes money from authors whose books are returned, I’m hoping these TERFs aren’t buying and returning Kindle editions just to leave shitty reviews). Anyway, it’s important to authors not to get dragged down by a TERF swarm, especially so early after publication. And it’s even more important to keep pushing back and showing TERFs that they can’t keep pulling this shit.

I’m honestly just so tired of their bullshit. Please find a non-destructive outlet for your trauma.