#dalmatians
I won’t be different - “Cruella” is a very satisfying movie.
And now it’s on Disney Plus free of charge so I could watch it again.
The idea for the drawing was quite obvious. As the second film will be made, I am curious if Emma Stone will be visually even closer to the “101 Dalmatians” version. What do you think?
Post link
mommy’s lil model
Remember when, during the making of Cruella, Disney decided to take a bold new approach to their live-action remakes and actually make a good movie
Glenn Close as Cruella De Vil in 101 Dalmatians (1996)
My sweet babies
My parents dogs Luna and Tycho
But ive got a serious bond with them
What the Fuck, Disney.
After a full day at work, and my yoga class, I wanted nothing more than to veg out with my sweet potato pasta dish and my cats. I clicked on HBO Go and started scrolling through movies. One of the first three movies to come up, since it’s alphabetical with numbers first, was 101 Dalmatians, the real-life version made by Disney years ago. I thought, “Oh, puppies! And Natasha Richardson!.. RIP.” (Yeah, I know, it’s her sister Joely, not her.)
Anyways, I started watching it and it’s cute and adorable and OMG!Puppies! and Playbill (on the right) is clearly enjoying it, too. Then it gets to the basic plot. Cruella DeVil wants to make a dress out of the fur of dalmatian puppies. This means she has to capture, kill, and skin a lot of them. She’s already done this to a rare white tiger in the beginning of the movie, which is bad enough. But now: PUPPIES?
Jesus H. Christ on a Cracker: What the fuck, Disney? Who decided that this was a good idea for a children’s movie? Steal the puppies to sell them on the black market as pets? OK. Maybe. But steal them so she can make a piece of clothing out of them? Fuck no. This movie is not appropriate for children. It’s not even appropriate for me. The thought of any animal dying so someone can wear it is disgusting so the thought of inflicting it on children makes me cringe.
No, Disney. Nice try, but fuck off. /End Rant
Post link
