#ediacaran
I FINALLY finished part 1 of the Evolution of Life poster that I was doing for my class-
it’s been a passion project of mine- I wanted to attempt something like this outside of school, regardless. the history of life on earth has always fascinated me!
This first part shows the transition from simple life to complex life, and the move from sea to land.
I really hurt my hand making this, but I think it was worth it (:
Species: P. abyssalis
Etymology: “Comb of leafy branches,” after its shape
Age and Location: Ediacaran of Newfoundland
Classification:?Eukarya:incertae sedis: Rangeomorpha
Pectinifronsis a rangeomorph, and so broadly similar to Fractofusus,which also was a sessile organism that reclined on the surface, and with which it shared a presumed osmotrophic lifestyle and fractal anatomy. However, despite the simplicity of their body plans, there was still substantial variation between different genera. Pectinifronswas an enormous organism by Ediacaran standards, with the largest individuals being nearly a meter long. Unlike Fractofusus,which lay flat on the seafloor, Pectininfronswas taco-shaped, with its midline lying on the seafloor and two rows of fronds sticking upward. While superficially it resembled a folded Fractofusus, though, it appears to have grown differently: all Fractofusushave the same number of fronds and are essentially identical except for size, while larger Pectinifronshave more fronds. This suggests that Fractofususdeveloped an adult morphology early in life and simply grew by expanding itself, whereas Pectinifronsgrew by lengthening the midline of its body and growing additional fronds. Such a dramatic difference in growth strategies suggests that the rangeomorphs might be more diverse than previously thought. What kind of organism rangeomorphs are–or if they’re a single kind of organism at all–remains unknown.
Sources
Bamforth EL., Narbonne GM., Anderson MM., Bamforth EL., Narbonne GUYM., Anderson MM., Crescent S. 2008. Growth and Ecology of a Multi-Branched Ediacaran Rangeomorph from the Mistaken Point. Journal of Paleontology 82:763–777.
Hoyal Cuthill JF., Conway Morris S. 2014. Fractal branching organizations of Ediacaran rangeomorph fronds reveal a lost Proterozoic body plan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
Species:E. plateauensis
Age and Location: Ediacaran of Namibia
Classification:?Eukaryaincertae sedis: Erniettomorpha
Ernietta is an iconic Ediacaran organism, and like most such organisms, its phylogenetic affinities are totally unknown, although like many other Ediacaran organisms, it may well be a stem-group animal. All we know for sure was that it was multicellular, but not apparently similar to any living multicellular organisms. A trait that defines the ‘erniettomorph’ body plan is a body The body of Erniettawas composed of essentially undifferentiated tubes of tough organic material. It appears to have lived mostly buried in the sand, with two fan-like fronds projecting into the water. Members of the genus seem to have lived together in large groups, perhaps as a consequence of their mode of reproduction.
Unlike all extant macroscopic organisms and like many other Ediacaran organisms, Erniettaprobably were osmotrophic–that is, they fed exclusively by passively absorbing nutrients from the water around them. This was possible as a result of its being essentially a sediment-filled bag, so that most of its body volume was actually just sand. The tubes that comprised the fan-like structures probably primarily served in osmotrophy while the others were structural and served to anchor the organism, however, there is no clear morphological distinction between different body regions.
Sources:
Ivantsov AY., Narbonne GM., Trusler PW., Greentree C., Vickers-Rich P. 2015. Elucidating Ernietta: new insights from exceptional specimens in the Ediacaran of Namibia. Lethaia.
Laflamme M., Xiao S., Kowalewski M. 2009. Osmotrophy in modular Ediacara organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106.