#bisexual info

When you say two things are different, and you specifically state one thing has a certain feature, you are heavily implying (if not outright stating) that the other specifically does not have that feature.

If you say Box A and Box B are distinct, then describe them:
Box A is 6″X6″X6″ and made of cardboard;
Box B is 6″X6″X6″, made of cardboard and purple”
Then (based on the information) Box A is necessarily not purple. If Box A was purple, they would not be distinct.

If you say pansexuality is distinct from bisexuality, then describe pansexuality as “attraction to all genders (inclusive of trans and NB people/with no gender preference/with no focus on genitals/with focus on personality/etc.)” then the implication is that the opposite is necessarily true of Bisexuality.

You’re saying bisexuality necessarily excludes trans and NB people.
You’re saying bisexuals necessarily have a gender preference.
You’re saying bisexuals necessarily focus on gender/genitals.
You’re saying bisexuals necessarily don’t focus on personality.

“Pansexuality means [definition of bisexuality] except [insults bisexuals].”

People will, literally, agree that there is no tangible difference between pansexuality and bisexuality, they will accept all arguments that pansexuality is not a distinct sexuality, they will fully agree with almost all battle-axe bisexual talking points… and then say “But the distinction matters to some”.

Pansexuals:Ignoring the many posts and documents battleaxe bis write about how pansexuality inherently re-defines bisexuality and harms bisexuals “Why can’t you just let people have fun?”

So many lists of LGBT+ identities contain labels that directly erase, redefine, or demonise other labels.

Doing this, first of all, perpetuates harmful misinformation. But secondly, it also pushes away many of us who belong under the LGBT(+) umbrella.

I feel no solidarity with those who spread false narratives about me to make themselves look better.