#commentary
I wrote the two-post, 7 -part caption story that immediately follows about a year ago and I must have been in a particularly dark place. You may want to take a pass on it if you don’t care for the more extreme stuff I post.
Anyway, I just want to emphasize that as with most of my posts (although not all), these are fantasies and not things I actually want to happen. That is particularly true of this caption set. Despite what you might think from reading this, personally I am doing fine and I’m well adjusted. I’m in a Femdom relationship with some who treats me with love and care and nothing like this.
That said, this caption set still turns me on, so I thought I would post it. Enjoy!
[TW for discussion of forced sterilization and racism]
So someone on Feministing (I think) finally made the connection that trans* rights and reproductive rights/abortion are both fundamentally about bodily integrity and autonomy and therefore have many intersections, and proponents of both should be working together (something I’ve been saying since day one, along with many other trans* people before me).
Well radical feminists aren’t having it. Apparently the fact eludes them that forced sterilization and forced birth are two sides of the same antichoice coin. Which brings me to my main point. This so-called “conflict of interest” has happened before (maybe more than once?). During the second wave the interests and reproductive rights of wealthy, white feminists and WoC were going in opposite directions. White women were demanding access to abortion and to voluntary sterilization without restrictions from paternalistic doctors and simultaneously WoC were struggling to: be allowed to have children, not be demonized for having children, not be forcibly sterilized (often without their knowledge or consent), and not be tested on for development of contraception or other medications. Guess who was prioritized. Exactly. There’s a history here and a lot of tension and mistrust (rightfully) still remains because rich, white women made “reproductive rights” synonymous with what they needed access to and completely avoided the fact that the right to have children is as much of a reproductive rights issue as the right to abort/not have children.
My point is we know these radical feminists hate intersectionality because they think sex-based oppression is the only thing that matters (this is racist all on its own) and we know they hate trans* people. The fact that they don’t see how important forced sterilization is now anymore than they did back then has some serious implications considering the intersection of race and trans* status. Forced sterilization affects us all but TWoC are disproportionately the victims of violence and often have an even more precarious and tenuous relationship to the medical establishment, opening them up to all kinds of violations, particularly in regards to reproductive rights. That once again forced sterilization isn’t a priority for radical feminists and reproductive rights activists is further proof of their racism and the fact that White Feminism™ is alive and well, in case you doubted it for a split second.
I would point out it’s not just radscum. Sure, radscum are the most obvious and most extreme but mainstream/liberal feminism still doesn’t really give a shit about reproductive rights as anything but abortion and voluntary sterilisation. Oh, wait, I take it back, they will sometimes mention fistulas and women in the developing countries but it’s still self-centred and paternalistic to other people. White Feminism™ lives in the mainstream as well as the backwater sludge that is the radscum.
Oh, definitely, definitely! I was just a little hyper-focused on them because this was a direct response to some stuff I saw on radical feminist blogs, but you’re absolutely right and I do usually go after mainstream/liberal feminists just as hard on this issue as well. They’re certainly not much better.
You’re born and it’s all “she’s such a beautiful baby just like her beautiful mum” you’re “blooming into such a beautiful girl” “don’t worry you’re still beautiful on the inside” you’re killed or die from illness “so tragic…she was so beautiful.” “She faded away but never lost her beautiful smile” you meet the person you will love and the first thing they say “you’re so beautiful”, become overworked for your entire life but “she always has time to take care of herself and stay beautiful” shakily apply more concealer and bronzer with your Parkinson’s-ridden elderly hands “she’s so beautiful at her age what’s her secret? She doesn’t look her age at all, ageing with beauty” on your deathbed “she was a beautiful woman inside and out”
I feel that wars are extremely disrespectful to women.. women make literally all those people and then men just destroy them, disregarding insane amount of pain, work, sacrifice, love, energy, time it took women to make just one person, and then they go and demand “you have to make more!!!” and we’re like “uh we literally saw what you did to last bunch no thanks” and then they’re offended and call us murderers?? like excuse me I would like to not contribute a human resource for your killing game? And I think you all owe women about thousand apologies? Stop unmaking everything we make and breaking our hearts in the process, and this is even without addressing the rampant violence and sexual aggression towards women in wars, every single war is a crime against women more than anyone else and nothing will change my mind.
“Liberalism has the following weaknesses:
1. It focuses on individual rights rather than collective rights.
2. It is ahistorical. It does not have a comprehensive understanding of women’s role in history nor has it any analysis for the subordination (subjugation) of women.
3. It tends to be mechanical in its support for formal equality without a concrete understanding of the condition of different sections/classes of women and their specific problems. Hence it was able to express the demands of the middle classes (white women from middle classes in the US and upper class, upper caste women in India) but not those of women from various oppressed ethnic groups, castes and the working, labouring classes.
4. It is restricted to changes in the law, educational and employment opportunities, welfare measures etc and does not question the economic and political structures of the society which give rise to patriarchal discrimination. Hence it is reformist in its orientation, both in theory and in practice.
5. It believes that the state is neutral and can be made to intervene in favour of women when in fact the bourgeois state in the capitalist countries and the semi-colonial and semi-feudal Indian state are patriarchal and will not support women’s struggle for emancipation. The State is defending the interests of the ruling classes who benefit from the subordination and devalued status of women.
6. Since it focuses on changes in the law, and state schemes for women, it has emphasised lobbying and petitioning as means to get their demands. The liberal trend most often has restricted its activity to meetings and conventions and mobilising petitions calling for changes. It has rarely mobilised the strength of the mass of women and is in fact afraid of the militant mobilisation of poor women in large numbers.”
—Anuradha Ghandy (Avanti), “Philosophical Trends in the Women’s Movement”
The complete and total hypocrisy that is art museums in Florence (and most of Italy) will never cease to be ridiculous.
They literally have dress codes that women can’t wear shorts or short sleeve shirts - despite being a popular summer destinations - because it would be indecent and informal, meanwhile almost every painting is a voyeuristic image of naked women for the appreciation of the male gaze.
Message is clear: women can’t show skin for their own physical comfort without being sinful, but men can choose to reveal women’s flesh for their own pleasure and monetary gain and it is called art.
Sergio’s torn hamstring is in his left leg. If you would recall, he suffered through a hamstring problem from the Cruz Azul match during the Club World Cup and though he was advised not to compete in the final, he pushed through it and eventually scored a vital goal. This goes to show that he has not fully recovered from that knock, aggravated it by playing weekly this year and thus, this 5-6 week long absence is the unfortunate price he has to pay. This could possibly explain his recent decline in quality in defense. Madridistas will have to place their faith in Varane and Nacho, and hope that Pepe could return soon once he’s fully fit and available.
cool people by chloe x halle is about merlin and lancelot
cus darling when u smile it’s like the rain dries out now there’s no more room for clouds got me singing hallelujah when u hold my hand it reminds me of there’s still cool people in the world
vintage bridal fashion: 1967
lynda bird johnson.
susan hampshire.
liza minnelli.
kathy kersh.
priscilla presley.
ann-margret.
raquel welch.
princess margriet of the netherlands.
queen margrethe ii of denmark.