A disclaimer that I am not a psychiatrist, so I will not be making any comment about this issues.
I’d also like to note that the diagnose is from a doctor who’s a highly trained professional.
***The purpose of my sharing these screenshots is not to be insensitive or to “make fun” of people who’re struggling with mental health. This is for education purpose, and for those who are keeping up with this trial.
In light of the trial that has started this past week, I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone of my followers that this is a pro-Johnny Depp blog.
Guys, we are not out the weeds yet for Johnny, I’m afraid.
There’s another civil trial against Johnny in the Greg Brooks v. Johnny Depp, et al. in California happening in July. Brooks is suing Johnny for emotional distress, and assault & battery.
Luckily, Camille is also representing Johnny in that case. Poor Camille, she gets no breaks.
Also, there’s no cameras in that trial, so we have to rely on the media to tell us about it, as well.
All I’m saying is that, this interview, was definitely foreshadowing what she would be like on the stand.
She has those same mannerisms in that video (which was universally hated while she was in a much better light) like she does when she was on the stand.
The only thing I’m a little shaky on is how JD’s team talks about how AH does not have PTSD. It’s possible she does have cPTSD from childhood abuse or otherwise. The recordings reflect hardcore abandonment trauma, which is a telltale borderline trait. If AH hadn’t taken her lies this far and caused so much harm, I would have more compassion for her bc she does need serious help.
Understandable. But that’s not what Amber, herself, is claiming. She claimed that she suffer from PTSD, not cPTSD. There’s actually a difference there, and not only that, she’s claiming that suffered this from the hands of Johnny, not her childhood at the hands of her father.
There’s a reason while she was on the stand, she talked very, and I do mean, very little about her childhood and the alleged abuse from her father. Even when Whitney on the stand, Elaine didn’t really ask about their childhood.
If Amber’s team would’ve dived in to it, it would contradict her earlier claims to suffering from PSTD from the relationship. That’s simply why she had an IME in the first place.
So yeah, it’s could very well be a possibility, but that’s not the issue that was brought forth by her. And to speculate otherwise, is kind of disrespectful to her imo.
The list on who’s on the final jury in the Depp v. Heard civil trial that is currently ongoing in Fairfax, Virginia.
(demonstrations from CourtTv & Rob from @Law & Lumber, one to show the full jury & the other to show the dimssed alternates)
The two alternates were Juror #2/B & Juror #8/H. Juror #2 is a Asian male, who is in the mid 20s. Juror #8 is a older White woman, who’s in her fifties. They were both assumed by lawyers and reporters, Ian (@.RunkleOfTheBailey), Larry @.DUI Guy), Rob (@.Law&Lumber), and James, (@JamesFromCourt) to be Pro-Johnny.
The remaining jury are these 7 individuals in total below.
1. Juror #1/A, a Asian male, assumed to be in his mid 20s to early 30s.
2. Juror #3/C, a Asian male, assumed to be in his mid 30s.
3. Juror #4/D, a Black woman, assumed to be in her mid 40s to early 50s.
4. Juror #5/E, a Asian woman, assumed to be in her early 30s.
5. Juror #6/F, a White man, assumed to be in his mid 60s.
6. Juror #7/G, a White man, assumed to be in his late 20s to early 30s.
7. Juror #9/I, a Asian man, assumed to be in his 40s. Interesting enough, this juror is assumed to be very Anti-Amber, to point of out right give her a scrawl when she was on the stand.
5 men, 2 women.
All of these 7 jurors must come to an unanimous decision to reach a verdict in this case.
I suspect the juror’s identities are gonna be a source of a lot of Op-Eds if they rule unfavorably for Heard, particularly the ratio of male to female. Since most of them are non-white I suspect some racist commentary under the guise of feminism might be smuggled in too.
I see what you’re saying, but I don’t think it will work out to well for her on the PR move on either of your proposed fronts.
The issue on complaining about the gender ratio on jury will be, her team picked and agreed on the jury. So, that will literally go nowhere, and will actually reflect really badly on her team.
The racism angle will be really weird and also backfire horribly on her. Amber has a history on being seen as “racist”, so this will probably add to it if they try to conjure up the angle. Also I wonder how that racial angle will go? Amber is a cis-white woman obviously; so let’s disregard her past a moment. If they push too hard, it could also backfire in which “POC abused women are never heard, and we only care about white women who’s abused”.
But I definitely think they are going down that radical feminist route. Sprinkle in how the trial shouldn’t be televised, people leaking things on Twitter, memes on her appearance and behavior in court, and you got a pretty dumb PR stunt. Also tie in some biphobia, cause why not?
The list on who’s on the final jury in the Depp v. Heard civil trial that is currently ongoing in Fairfax, Virginia.
(demonstrations from CourtTv & Rob from @Law & Lumber, one to show the full jury & the other to show the dimssed alternates)
The two alternates were Juror #2/B & Juror #8/H. Juror #2 is a Asian male, who is in the mid 20s. Juror #8 is a older White woman, who’s in her fifties. They were both assumed by lawyers and reporters, Ian (@.RunkleOfTheBailey), Larry @.DUI Guy), Rob (@.Law&Lumber), and James, (@JamesFromCourt) to be Pro-Johnny.
The remaining jury are these 7 individuals in total below.
1. Juror #1/A, a Asian male, assumed to be in his mid 20s to early 30s.
2. Juror #3/C, a Asian male, assumed to be in his mid 30s.
3. Juror #4/D, a Black woman, assumed to be in her mid 40s to early 50s.
4. Juror #5/E, a Asian woman, assumed to be in her early 30s.
5. Juror #6/F, a White man, assumed to be in his mid 60s.
6. Juror #7/G, a White man, assumed to be in his late 20s to early 30s.
7. Juror #9/I, a Asian man, assumed to be in his 40s. Interesting enough, this juror is assumed to be very Anti-Amber, to point of out right give her a scrawl when she was on the stand.
5 men, 2 women.
All of these 7 jurors must come to an unanimous decision to reach a verdict in this case.
Here is specifically what the jury is concerned about: 
There is confusion about whether or not the title is a statement in question or the Op-Ed. The title is what in question, and Judge Azcarate clarified.
This is be a big deal. It could be that the jury only finds that the title statement (which is Johnny’s strongest argument) is only defamatory, and not the other two.
This is also the first finding instruction for the plaintiff. Which means that the jury is most likely getting ready to decide on which statements are defamatory, and soon to be verdict. Or at least voting on it.
The entire jury instruction is actually very confusing with the language being used. I don’t know if I should make another specific post as to why, but to boil it down, linguistic speaking, it depends on how the jury determines “and” v. “or”, and “any” v. “all”, also switching between taking things as a “whole” and then separating to specific statements.
I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s another television court session.
