#march for our lives

LIVE

My Opinion On The March….

What is a March gonna do? Nothing! So we make stricter gun laws, so what! If a man is willing to prime the gun, aim at another human being, and pull the trigger… what makes you think they’re are gonna follow the law?!…. The government doesn’t give two shits about us! And they never will! The moment you get that through your skull, the easier it is to swallow the pill.

I’m not saying I like the threat of possibly being shot the next time I go to school. I’m not saying I’m not sad about those who have already died. I’m not saying that the law shouldn’t be stricter….. what I am saying is there’s no point in making posters and t-shirts and body paint, cause whether you do or don’t, the laws not gonna change and the government is gonna do whatever the fuck they want.

So go ahead with your signs and t-shirts as you March…. and if something is changed, get back to me!

Racist Scumbag Puppet President Trump needed to be coached on how to empathize with mass shooting su

Racist Scumbag Puppet President Trump needed to be coached on how to empathize with mass shooting survivors and victims families. Only a narcissist need this kind of help.


Post link

By Evan Stewart on May 7, 2018

Major policy issues like gun control often require massive social and institutional changes, but many of these issues also have underlying cultural assumptions that make the status quo seem normal. By following smaller changes in the way people think about issues, we can see gradual adjustments in our culture that ultimately make the big changes more plausible.

image

For example, today’s gun debate even drills down to the little cartoons on your phone. There’s a whole process for proposing and reviewing new emoji, but different platforms have their own control over how they design the cartoons in coordination with the formal standards. Last week, Twitter pointed me to a recent report from Emojipedia about platform updates to the contested “pistol” emoji, moving from a cartoon revolver to a water pistol:

Inan update to the original post, all major vendors have committed to this design change for “cross-platform compatibility.”

There are a couple ways to look at this change from a sociological angle. You could tell a story about change from the bottom-up, through social movements like the March For Our Lives, calling for gun reform in the wake of mass shootings. These movements are drawing attention to the way guns permeate American culture, and their public visibility makes smaller choices about the representation of guns more contentious. Apple didn’t comment directly on the intentions behind the redesign when it came out, but it has weighed in on the politics of emoji design in the past.

You could also tell a story about change from the top-down, where large tech companies have looked to copy Apple’s innovation for consistency in a contentious and uncertain political climate (sociologists call this “institutional isomorphism”). In the diagram, you can see how Apple’s early redesign provided an alternative framework for other companies to take up later on, just like Google and Microsoft adopted the dominant pistol design in earlier years.

Either way, if you favor common sense gun reform, redesigning emojis is obviously not enough. But cases like this help us understand how larger shifts in social norms are made up of many smaller changes that challenge the status quo.

Evan Stewart is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of Minnesota. You can follow him on Twitter.

By Jay Livingston, PhD on March 27, 2018

Originally Posted at Montclair SocioBlog

A question that few people seem to be asking about Enough Is Enough and the March for Our Lives is: Why now? Or to paraphrase a question that some people soon will be asking: How is the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School different from other school shootings?

There’s #MeToo and #Time’sUp, of course. These may have inspired advocates of other liberal causes like gun control. But just three weeks earlier, a 15-year old in Benton, Kentucky brought a handgun to school and started shooting – 2 dead, 18 injured. The incident evoked only the usual responses, nothing more.

Here’s my hunch: when I first saw the kids in Parkland speaking out, organizing, demanding that adults do something, I immediately thought of a sociology book that had nothing to do with guns –Unequal Childhoodsby Annette Lareau published in 2003.

These high-schoolers, I thought, are the children of “concerted cultivation.” That was the term Lareau used for the middle-class approach to raising kids. It’s not just that middle-class parents cultivate the child’s talents, providing them with private coaches and organized activities. There is less separation of the child’s world and the adult world. Parents pay attention to children and take them seriously, and the children learn how to deal with adults and with institutions run by adults.

One consequence is the notorious sense of “entitlement” that older people find so distressing in millennials. Here is how Lareau put it:

This kind of training developed in Alexander and other middle-class children a sense of entitlement. They felt they had a right to weigh in with an opinion, to make special requests, to pass judgment on others, and to offer advice to adults. They expected to receive attention and to be taken very seriously.

It is this sense of entitlement – the teenager’s sense that she is entitled to have some effect on the forces that affect her life – that made possible the initial protests by the students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. And once word of that protest spread, it was this same sense of entitlement, these same assumptions about their place in the world, that made so many other high school students join the movement.

Conservatives just could not believe that kids could or should be so adept at mounting an effective movement or that they could or should speak intelligently about political issues. So right-wing commentary insisted that the students were paid “crisis actors” or pawns of various forces of evil – adult anti-gun activists, the media, or the “deep state.” They also claimed that the students were “rude” and that they did not have standing to raise the issue of gun control.

[the students] say that they shouldn’t be able to own guns even though they can go to war, but they think that they should be able to make laws. None of this makes any sense at all. (See the excerpts in the transcript here.)

In a way, Fox and their friends are hauling out the old notion that children should know their place. But the motivation isn’t some newfound independence, it’s middle-class values. As Lareau says, concerted cultivation makes children far more dependent on parents than does the “natural growth” parenting more common in working-class families. Besides, foreign visitors since the early days of the republic have remarked on the independence of American children. What’s new, and what is so upsetting to exponents of older ideas, is how parents themselves have taught teenagers to demand that they have a say in the decisions that shape their lives.

Jay Livingston is the chair of the Sociology Department at Montclair State University. You can follow him at Montclair SocioBlog or on Twitter.

I stand in solidarity with the thousands of students, teachers, school staff, and parents protesting today. I’m heartbroken over the continuing, senseless, preventable violence; and I’m encouraged by the amazing teens’ response. You’ve likely seen the figure going around that 4 million teens will turn 18 before the midterm elections this year. To quote my favorite sign from this year’s Women’s March in LA: “Grab ‘Em By The Midterms”

You can’t stop a bullet with thoughts and prayers. To honor those lost and save countless lives, we need action. We’re dying while we wait for it.

this is the time for action. join us in the fight against gun violence for the Stay Amped benefit sh

this is the time for action. join us in the fight against gun violence for the Stay Amped benefit show at The Anthem in D.C. on 3/23, the night before March for Our Lives. proceeds go to Everytown For Gun Safety + Giffords: Courage to Fight Gun Violence -tickets go on sale Wednesday at 10am.


Post link
With the 2020 Democratic presidential debates in full swing, gun violence prevention experts want moWith the 2020 Democratic presidential debates in full swing, gun violence prevention experts want moWith the 2020 Democratic presidential debates in full swing, gun violence prevention experts want moWith the 2020 Democratic presidential debates in full swing, gun violence prevention experts want mo

With the 2020 Democratic presidential debates in full swing, gun violence prevention experts want moderators of upcoming debates to ask candidates fact-based questions about firearm policy. 

In the past, gun safety platforms have failed to break through during both primary and general presidential debates. In this election cycle, moderator Chuck Todd did bring up gun safety during the first democratic presidential primary debate on June 26, but he adopted a right-wing talking point that strengthening gun laws would require confiscation of people’s privately owned firearms, serving as an example of how not to question the candidates about their platforms. 

Media Matters asked several gun safety experts how they’d like to see future debate moderators tackle questions about gun policy—here are some of their responses.


Post link
james-winston: Paul, marching for John. God, it really is beautiful what Paul does for his best friejames-winston: Paul, marching for John. God, it really is beautiful what Paul does for his best friejames-winston: Paul, marching for John. God, it really is beautiful what Paul does for his best friejames-winston: Paul, marching for John. God, it really is beautiful what Paul does for his best friejames-winston: Paul, marching for John. God, it really is beautiful what Paul does for his best frie

james-winston:

Paul, marching for John.

God, it really is beautiful what Paul does for his best friend. Even though he’s gone, he raises his voice for John. Very touching.


Post link

Saturday June 11th….

The entire United States will be marching for gun rights. March For Our Lives, the organization that was made after the Stoneman Douglas Mass Shooting 4 years ago on Valntines Day, is calling out for those who want to see changes and legislation for gun rights and laws take place.

And for those who are not in the United States, you can still help! March in support. No where else in the world has so many mass shootings. This past weekend we had a total of 8-12 mass shootings and we are still counting! Never has this happened in the history of America.

If you would like to find your local March in your home town area, or fly to Washington D.C. and make a stand in front of our nation’s capital. Click on the link below.

loading