#historic fashion
spent like twice as long as this took to sketch just reading about 16th century Italian clothing for these fictional characters from a fictionalized city loosely based on renaissance Italy nbd nbd
Senden şarkı olmaz, sığdıramam
1930’s
1870s
1894 & 1896
A strange phenomenon I’ve observed
So I’ve increasingly noticed that when people think of the fashion of a specific dynasty/era, for some godforsaken reason the image that pops into their head is always the fashion of the era that immediately succeeds it?? It’s never the preceding era either, just always exactly the era that came right after. It confuses me immensely. Some common examples are:
- 18th century Qing fashion being mislabelled as Ming
- 1920s Han hairstyles and early 20th century Manchu fashion in general being mislabelled as Qing
- 1950s cheongsam being mislabelled as Republican era
- Ladies with Hair Flowers being used as Tang Dynasty fashion resource, despite it being made after that (I’m not even interested in the Tang yet I know about this, it’s weirdly prevalent)
Pictorial evidence:
Painting from the book 古代风俗百图 by 王弘力. It’s labelled Ming but the grown ups are wearing obvious early 18th century (Qing) fashion.
Qianlong era (ca. 1750s) artwork from series 燕寝怡情图册.
Influential styling from the movie 橘子红了. It’s set in the Qing Dynasty but the hair and clothing look 1920s (Republican era).
1920s artwork.
Illustration showing “Republican era” cheongsam by artist 末春.
1950s (Mao era, People’s Republic of China) portrait by Sam Sanzetti. A lot of commercial “Republican era style” cheongsam you can buy on Taobao nowadays look extremely 1950s, to the point where if they were labeled 1950s they would be perfectly historically accurate, but they’re far fetched from the 1930s or 40s.
I literally don’t know why this is, it baffles me. If anyone has similar examples from other periods/places feel free to share.
Fashioning the Masculinity: the Art of Menswear
V&A via Gucci, London
60s hairstyles I can’t take my mind off of…