#manifest destiny
Condone violence in all forms it manifest.
people on tumblr will look at this painting and be like “what if the artist just wanted to paint a big lady”
All I wanna do, is colonize with you
And a giant woman, a giant woman
All I wanna see, is manifest destiny
As a giant woman
- term coined by John O’Sullivan
- belief that it was God’s will that the US expand from sea to sea
- oregon trail
- troubles with indians
- MARTIN VAN BUREN -1836
- WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON-1840 (DIED WITHIN A MONTH OF OFFICE), TYLER REPLACED HIM
- TYLER - “Tippacanoe & Tyler Too” was Harrison & tyler’s campaign
- Battle of Aroostok - b/w GB & US (specifically Maine) fighting over land (Aroostok river valley), settled by the Webster-Ashburton treaty
- JAMES K POLK - “MANIFEST DESTINY PRESIDENT”
- Oregon territory dispute with GB, “54’ 40 or fight”
- Texas joins US - Mexican War (set rio grande as border)
- Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo granted US California, NM, AZ, UT, and NV)
Kevin Starr describes the debate over allowing California into the Union, as it hung on the issue of slavery, or the South’s “peculiar institution” (p73). This is a belittling way to describe slavery, as if it were peculiar to the South, or particular to the antebellum period. It is representative of a certain misconception that many continue to perpetuate, as described on the website for the modern non-profit anti-slavery group, TraffickFree.org:
“ there are more slaves now than ever before in human history - approximately 27 million around the world
(….)
“17,500 slaves are brought into the United States every year “
So in the least it is a poor choice of words on Starr’s part, but also seems to contradict information he admits to later in the chapter, albeit in a mitigated vocabulary:
“immigrants who arrived at Sutter’s Fort (…) contracted from him the labor (and sometimes it has been alleged, the sexual services) of Native Americans indentured to Sutter or otherwise under his control, many of them little better off than slaves.” [pp77-78]
I must wonder what he qualifies in their situation as being ‘not quite as bad as’ slavery-slavery.
Like the seats of a teeter-totter, the surge of outsiders into California during the Gold Rush brought with it a commensurate decline in the lives and cultures of Native Americans. In many ways this pattern copies the earlier interaction of Spanish colonials and Native’s in the first days of settlement and the introduction of the mission-system. For this reason, when Starr waxes poetically about the Gold Rush “…reprising the dreams of the Spanish conquistadores, explorers, and maritime adventurers…” or that “the quest for El Dorado was now being Americanized with its psychological and mythic hold as powerful as ever” [p.81], he belies the real pattern of greed and exploitation that was recurring.
With that being said, the Gold Rush must still be credited with bringing an unprecedented cultural diversity to the State, even at the expense of the indigenous cultural diversity that was supplanted in the process. This diversity would at least provide grounds for a cosmopolitan conversation on race and cultural diversity, even if it was rather immature in its early days. Truly people came from all over the world and became a part of this new conversation.
I sleep with an attitude of Manifest Destiny. I not only can, but am destined to, stretch the whole way from the east to the west side of the bed. But I don’t stop there. I also dominate from north to south.