#justice for johnny depp

LIVE

“we should believe Amber Heard because we should always believe women” okay so how about we believe the woman whose rape story was almost stolen by her, hadn’t she exposed her for it first? how about we believe Amber Heard’s nurse who confirmed there was no injuries on her? or how about we believe dozens of women who know Johnny Depp and all insist he’s a good person?

how about we believe these women instead of the woman who was caught lying time after time, the woman who was previously arrested for domestic violence against another woman, the woman who used the Me Too movement for her own advantage and the woman who attempted to steal another woman’s rape story in hope to destroy an innocent man’s life?

as a woman who actually read court documents, listened to the audiotape which she admitted to having abused her spouse, and saw all the evidences against her, I do not believe Amber Heard.

Amber Heard doesn’t deserve anythinganymore??

WRONG!!!

There is one (1) thing she totally deserves:

justfandomwritings:

I DO believe all women. That’s why I support Johnny Depp.

I believe all of Johnny’s exes and female costars who said he would never do what Amber accused him of. I believe Kate Moss, saying Amber Heard lied on the stand about what happened between her and Johnny Depp. I believe Wynona saying Johnny never hurt or did anything untoward with her. I believe his first wife, Lori, who says he would never hurt a fly, that they are still friends, that he never hurt her or any woman.

I believe Kate James when she says that Amber Heard stole her story of SA. When she says Amber Heard spit in her face whenever she got upset. When she says Amber was an abusive employer.

I believe Johnny’s sister saying he always hid and ran from fights.

I believe the police report Tasya filed against Amber Heard accusing her of domestic violence.

I believe the women at Milani that Amber Heard lied about having their makeup palette for the entirety of their relationship.

And I believe Amber Heard. I believe her on tape saying she hit Johnny Depp. I believe her on tape making fun of Johnny for running from physical altercations. I believe her on tape admitting that she always started physical altercations. I believe her on tape saying that she did this because no judge or jury would believe a man could be a victim.

And I believe she was smart to refuse to turn over the contents of her phone in spite of a court order to do so.

pruneratfaverolles:

it’s really loving johnny depp hours huh

spidey-d00d:

I will actually fist fight whoever says they side with amber heard, like genuinely

ccheriebomb:

ambitious-witch:

tsuncoon:

If you still believe the media…

Here’s Amber Heard’s photo in evidence and here’s what Dan Wootton at The Sun put on their front page.

Amber Heards team also refused to turn over the Metadata for these photos, so the date these photos were taken cannot be verified.


Also, that headline? The Sun is such an unspeakable pile of feces. A ‘serial’ abuser is an abuser that has more than one victim. How many victims JD had at the time? Zero.

No one in the UK, or indeed anyone who’s familiar with the infamous British tabloid press, gives a teensy bit of shit about what The Sun has to say.

It literally has no credibility here and everyone knows it is owned by the POS Rupert Murdoch. The Sun loves to cherry pick facts and run misleading stories with sensationalist headlines all the time. They will print anything if it means money. It gets sued all the fucking time lmao.

Anyone who tries to use the ruling of the UK trial to argue in AH’s favour is ignorant af. Find any British person and ask them what they think of The Sun lmao.

wellpresseddaisy:

iridescentbeetlejuice:

Okay but like people who have strong opinions on the Amber Heard and Johnny depp case, ..like how do you have strong opinions. How do you people decide which side you’re on , which are facts and which false accusations. Like. Genuinely.

For me, it comes down to this (and I’m taking this as a genuine quesion):

  1. There’s verified audio of AH admitting to abusing JD. It’s been played in court and is being used as evidence.
  2. JD leaves when there’s conflict. This is also from verified audio of AH mocking him for leaving so he doesn’t get hit again.
  3. For all the accusations AH made, there’s no real evidence of injury. Some of the things she alleges would have left her in the hospital and yet she’s wearing backless dresses a day or two later with no evidence of injury (or even illusion netting to help hide injuries) or going on a talk show and moving in ways you can’t with bruised ribs. The only person who shows evidence of injury in photos is JD. (Continued a bit in #7)
  4. They had access to 24/7 concierge medical care from a dedicated team. Not once after AH alleges she was brutalized were there notes supporting this. Not even a bruise is noted.
  5. There’s audio of AH freaking out because she smashed JD’s finger. Everyone covered for her on it.
  6. Not one of JD’s former wives or girlfriends has spoken badly of him as a person. Most of them are still cordial/friendly with him, which says a lot. Was he a perfect husband or boyfriend? Probably not, but there’s no evidence he was ever abusive to anyone.
  7. Johnny Depp was diagnosed with ADHD in 2014. Drugs like cocaine don’t act the same way with an ADHD physiology as they do in someone not ADHD. Basically, for JD it would be like taking Ritalin. The reports that he mellowed out on drugs are likely true - that’s what stimulant drugs do when you have ADHD.
  8. AH’s claims keep changing (things she claimed happened in 2013 now happened in 2012). She’s adding things on the stand that she’s never alleged before. Some things she claimed before or now are proved a lie by pictures taken by a property manager (Australia) or body cam (LA), or by paparazzi photos taken a day to a week after attacks that would have been brutal and would have left marks (being dragged through broken glass/walking through broken glass means stitches).
  9. She and her team have refused to hand over her phone. They’ve provided pictures, but those pictures have no metadata included, so they can’t be verified. Essentially, any proof she provides is ‘because I said so’.

Basically, believing everything AH says as true would lead me to completely abandoning all common sense and reason.

What about the fact that she’s changed details over and over since this all blew up?

2016:He didn’t let me see my friends or family! I was kept isolated from everyone!

2022: Friends and family were living on the property, rent free the whole time and frequently came over for dinner.

2016:He would always chase me down and I could never have a moment of peace!

2022: Literal recordings of her mocking him for 'always running’ and 'never fighting for the relationship’. Admits to following him when he locks himself in bathrooms or bedrooms to get away from her. Calls him a coward for doing it.

Over and over, things she claimed in 2016 have changed by 2022.

tsuncoon:

“Why people even watching the court case, abuse is not entertainment!”

The victim, Johnny Depp, wants people to watch the court case!! It is the whole point of suing Scamber in the first place! He fought for it to be televised because otherwise could continue to lie behind the scene and people would have to take her word at face value!! Ignorance is how Amber wins!! Watch the case and see for yourselves that she staged scenes to accuse Johnny Depp of things he never did.

Interesting no one said “why are people even reading Amber Heards Op-ed!” When it dropped. So she can lie about him on a public forum where he has no voice to rebuttle but we’re not allowed to watch in real time him disproving her lies in an organized setter where she has equal opertunity to state her evidence?

If anyone says “don’t watch the case” automatically assuming they’re an Amber Heard supporter.

Amber Heard’s bootlickers are now whining about how many YouTube videos the trial is getting.

Many people, here and on Twitter, are claiming that Johnny’s team had paid off all these accounts that have existed for years, to post the footage of the trial over and over.

Now they’re saying it isn’t fair and this shouldn’t be televised at all because everything’s making Amber look bad. BUT when claims were made about the other trial, these same people were going on and on about how you can’t trust hearsay and since there was no video proof of how she behaved at trial or how overly favored she was by the judge, everyone should just be on her side.

And now we have video proof of how she behaves. Johnny fought tooth and nail to get it televised so that there are official videos of her listening to her own abusive recordings where she admits to a myriad of abusive behaviors toward him. Those are now public where everyone can watch at any time. No one can claim these are falsified. No one can claim these were fake leaks spread around the internet. The are real and are there. And yes, her admitting to hitting him, following him around, throwing things at him, cursing at him, withholding his medication or trying to force him to take more medication so he can’t call out her BS, DO INDEED make her look bad. Cuz they’re bad.

This woman has spent years making a mockery of abuse victims. She and her fans have been nothing but terrible about this. They don’t like memes and critical posts being made about Amber, but had no problem when they were made in Amber’s favor for the past 5 years. It’s only wrong, uncivil, and uncouth now.

Now it’s suddenly, ’they were mutually abusive’. Now it’s suddenly, ’he’s an actor too why isn’t he being blasted’. Amber Heard is supposedly an A-List Actress and she sucks at it. She’s being mocked for being unable to maintain a convincing facial expression for more than a few seconds before she goes back to smirking. She’s being mocked for being incapable of pulling up some tears at least to make her ugly faces more believable.

The problem here is that Johnny, in person and in all these damn recordings of him, has remained quiet and level-headed as he speaks. She is always the one raising her voice. She is always the one hurling insults. She is the one who cycles through facial expressions as she struggles to find the right one for the situation and then just gives up and goes back to either smirking or being bored. Overly emotional people reliving trauma get red in the face and nose and their eyes get puffy and red as they cry. Even if she managed to mostly hold in her body’s hyperventilation, it’ll still be obvious. She’s not affected at all. She can’t even bother to try looking affected for more than a few seconds before she’s smirking again.

Dumb memes from a small percentage of the audience is definitely worth dealing with if we get to have all this proof exposed in court and caught on camera. Y'all could handle improper memes about Johnny’s situation for 5 years so you can deal with this.

palepinksatin:

nerdylilpeebee:

palepinksatin:

mllesquellette:

palepinksatin:

mllesquellette:

palepinksatin:

Amber when she’s alone with her ‘abuser’:chases him to 7 different rooms when he’s trying to get away from her, pounds on the door until he cracks it open then forces her way into the room by kicking said door into him, throws pots, pans, vases, bottles, cans and other objects at him, slaps, shoves, punches, hits, scratches and pushes him, tries to physically prevent him from leaving when she gets violent, yells and screams at him at the top of her lungs, insults, name calls, emasculates, laughs at, demeans, harangues, berates and belittles him, tries to diminish and disparage his well established, well respected 38 year acting career, attacks his parental skills and tells him she hopes his son’s stepfather can teach him how to be a man bc he doesn’t know how to, taunts and mocks him for not engaging in physical fights with her, chases him to the elevator and stands in front of the door when he tries to leave, dares him to tell the world he’s a victim of dv and see how many people believe or side with him.

Amber when she’s in a crowded court room and sees her ‘abuser’ casually approaching the nearby exit without even glancing in her direction: theatrically recoils in terror despite staring him dead in the face for the entirety of his testimony and walking past him devoid of any visceral emotional reaction a few hours prior.

Here, have this testimony of Amber’s neighbors detailing the wonderful treatment she received from Depp

https://inforrm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Defs-Closing.pdf

Firstly, her “neighbours” were her best friends who Johnny let live in his penthouses rent free, which is the last thing a controlling abuser would do as they always try to isolate their victim as much as possible. Secondly, you’re sending me shit that’s already been thoroughly debunked (watch Incredibly Average on YT or do a basic Google search and you’ll be bombarded by posts and audio/video footage disproving Amber and her friends claims, her bullshit injury photos etc.) as if that somehow negates all of the literal documented facts I mentioned in my post.

And most of Depp‘s witnesses are his employees, will you still dismiss their testimonies because they’re friends with/ financially dependent on Depp? Are you seriously ignoring the UK libel case, wherein the court ruled that calling him a “wife-beater” was absolutely justified based on her evidence. Are you seriously referring me to a YouTuber, when according to an actual judge Depp was “violent towards Ms Heard on multiple occasions”?

I would if Johnny’s employees had proven themselves to be liars like Amber’s besties have. But even if we disregard their testimony altogether there’s still literal fucking audio of Amber abusing, taunting, provoking and gaslighting Johnny for hours on end, in which AT. NO. POINT. IN. TIME. does he lash out at her physically, despite her claims of him losing his shit and beating tf out of her at the drop of a hat like some kind of uncontrollable beast. In fact AMBER’S the one who says, and I quote, "I can’t promise you I won’t get physical again, I just get so mad sometimes I fucking lose it.” (similar to what she said to Ben on the plane back from Australia), and JOHNNY’S the one who tells her over and over again in no uncertain terms that he WILL NOT get into a physical altercation with her and he has to leave when she gets to that point bc he can’t just stand there and take the punches. There’s at least 8 or 9 hrs of publically available audio of her ripping him to fucking shreds, talking about his kids, emasculating and demeaning him, calling him a pussy and a coward for, in her own words, “walking/running away from every fight”, guaranteeing him it’s only gonna make her worse if he does that bc she views it as him disrespecting their marriage and dehumanizing her, insulting him in a weird ass baby voice interspersed with her drunkenly cackling like a demented supervillain, admitting to starting physical fights and throwing pots, pans, vases and other objects at him, daring him to tell the world he’s a victim and see who believes him, and the list goes on.

And yes, I am referring you to a YouTuber bc the work Brian has done on this case is phenomenal. He’s spent an insane amount of time analyzing, comparing and investigating everything from witness statements to photo evidence to CCTV footage to Amber’s injuries and noting the absolute MOUNTAIN of irreconcilable inconsistencies therein, whereas the biased judge in the UK pretty much just took whatever Amber said as the truth and arbitrarily discounted everything Johnny said. But if you wanna remain willfully ignorant of the evidence and rely on the fact he lost a civil case in another country (civil cases are based on probability unlike criminal cases where a crime has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt), that’s entirely your prerogative.

As for the shit you mentioned in your tags, trashing a hotel room doesn’t equate to being a wife beater and Kate Moss has said Johnny was never violent towards her and she still supports him to this day. Ellen Barkin said he threw a bottle at a wall, NOT at her, and she also said the same thing Kate said about him not being violent towards her. The incident with the crew member was overblown bullshit. The dude was hurling racial slurs at a black woman and Johnny took issue with it, which resulted in a verbal altercation between the two (there were witnesses). The texts he sent about drowning and burning Amber weren’t even directed at her, he was venting to a friend about his abuser. If a battered wife said she hoped her male abuser got tortured to death ppl would be saying her anger was justified, but if a dude says horrible shit about his female abuser that he has no intention of acting on suddenly he’s no longer a victim. And if you take issue with what Johnny said I assume you’re equally horrified about Amber and her friend joking about her stabbing Johnny with the knife she bought him? Or does she get a pass on that bc she’s a woman? And does she also get a pass on her previous arrest for domestic violence that she was lucky enough not to be charged with bc she and her partner didn’t live in the same state the assault (which was witnessed by two police officers) took place in?

Hilarious that part of their argument was literally “a court said he couldn’t sue for defamation so that means he’s guilty.” Like, seriously? Is it crack??? Is it crack that you smoke?????

These people will take literally hours of audio recording of Amber admitting to being the abuser, countless witnesses including Johnny’s former partner and children, the physical evidence of Depp being abused, the lack of physical evidence or even medical records of Amber being abused, and toss it all out the window cuz a court ruled against him on a DEFAMATION LAWSUIT.

Like, fucking hell, they could not make it more obvious they don’t want the Pussy Pass to go away.

The ppl who say Johnny losing the UK case is solid proof he abused Amber are the same ppl who’d be saying it doesn’t mean shit if he wins this case.

Precisely. Honestly, Amber could be convicted of rape and abuse and sent to prison and they’d still say that’s not proof she was the abuser.

cockadilf:

To those of you wondering why the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard case is being broadcast live, and to those of you who think this is none of our business and it shouldn’t be public: this is for you.

Gonna preface this by saying I’m very bias towards Johnny so if you’re on Amber’s side get out you don’t want to see this. I’m not going to try to hide my biases or stay neutral for this post.

It’s actually EXTREMELY important that this court case be publicly available. I understand thinking that the funny YouTube clip shows are disrespectful and gross, they are, but there’s REASONS that this case is being streamed live, and it’s not for entertainment purposes.

Firstly, Johnny’s team fought for this court case to be live. They want everything public. So if you think Johnny doesn’t want this, you’re wrong. This whole court case is very much live because Johnny wanted it to be live. It was Amber’s team who wanted to keep it private. The case in UK was not streamed live, and Johnny lost. All information that was presented in that court case was lost to the public, besides what we were told. And the result? It made Johnny look a lot worse. It solidified for many that Amber’s claims were true. That’s not happening this time. This time, Johnny is making sure everyone gets to see everything, because as hard as it must be admitting to the world that he was victimized by Amber Heard, he felt he had to for the sake of his children. The world disgraced Johnny after Amber’s allegations came out. She claimed he was not only physically and verbally abusive to her, but that his own children were terrified of their father. Johnny is doing all this for the sole purpose of making sure his kids are able to live their lives without being mocked and ridiculed and belittled for having an “abusive” father. Johnny wants to show his kids that he is the good person he believes he is, and they believe he is. That’s why he fought for this to be live - because even if he loses this case, everything is now out in the open, and people are able to come to their own conclusions about him and Amber Heard. As far as that goes, he’s pretty much already won the court of public opinion. We’ll see if Amber’s team is able to turn that around.

Secondly, this case was already very public even before Johnny ever sued Amber. Amber came out with a public confession about her abuse, and called for Hollywood to blacklist Johnny. This was national news. Everyone knew about it. It cost Johnny his career. Especially at the height of the Me Too era, people automatically turned against him. The public message was clear: Johnny is an abusive wife-beater, and Amber is a victim. And Amber’s Op Ed regarding the affair made it EXTREMELY clear that she was not looking to keep the status of their relationship private. She went on a press tour after the divorce. She has always very publicly stated her side of the events. For Johnny’s side, his public statements have always been in response to Amber’s, denying her claims. The world already knew Amber’s testimony, from way back in 2016. This is the first time we are seeing Johnny’s side, which is being presented so nakedly to the public. And for Amber’s sake, her team is getting that exact same privilege. If this case was never national news, if people didn’t already have opinions formed on the situation, than I would understand wanting to keep it private. However, Johnny’s team wanted it public because Amber’s side was already public. They wanted to win back the public opinion, or at least have the truth out there clear as day, so Amber’s team wouldn’t be able to twist anything else.

Thirdly, I believe this case is important because it is an extremely high profile case that involves domestic abuse in a relationship where the accused perpetrator is a woman and the accusing victim is a man. It is no secret that in most domestic abuse cases, the woman’s side is taken. Male domestic abuse victims are rarely believed, and that needs to change. This isn’t to discredit female abuse victims, but male abuse victims should not be forced to live with their abuse or even worse, be mocked and ridiculed for speaking out against it. And even more so that the alleged abuser is now using her power to take revenge on her victim one last time, by ruining his career and making sure he’ll never have another job in Hollywood again. Johnny is here speaking not just for himself, but for male domestic abuse victims everywhere, who have been silenced by the absurd belief that “men can’t be the victims of abuse” or that “men who are abused are worthless cowards.” The stigma against male domestic abuse victims needs to be stopped. They need to know that they can come out against their abuser, and they will be heard. If Johnny wins this case it will be a huge step forward for male victims. Because it’s being so widely publicized, that’s already happening. Johnny is taking a public stance against domestic abuse and against abuse on men in particular, whether or not he realizes it.

In conclusion, please don’t watch this case for entertainment purposes only. But also don’t assume that that’s the reason it’s available to the public. Johnny’s team fought for this. Johnny wants everyone to know the truth, and whether you’re on his side or Amber’s, the truth WILL come out in this case. We’re about a week away from Amber’s cross examination, so we’ll see how things go from there. In the meantime, just try not to be an asshole.

palepinksatin:

mllesquellette:

palepinksatin:

mllesquellette:

palepinksatin:

Amber when she’s alone with her ‘abuser’:chases him to 7 different rooms when he’s trying to get away from her, pounds on the door until he cracks it open then forces her way into the room by kicking said door into him, throws pots, pans, vases, bottles, cans and other objects at him, slaps, shoves, punches, hits, scratches and pushes him, tries to physically prevent him from leaving when she gets violent, yells and screams at him at the top of her lungs, insults, name calls, emasculates, laughs at, demeans, harangues, berates and belittles him, tries to diminish and disparage his well established, well respected 38 year acting career, attacks his parental skills and tells him she hopes his son’s stepfather can teach him how to be a man bc he doesn’t know how to, taunts and mocks him for not engaging in physical fights with her, chases him to the elevator and stands in front of the door when he tries to leave, dares him to tell the world he’s a victim of dv and see how many people believe or side with him.

Amber when she’s in a crowded court room and sees her ‘abuser’ casually approaching the nearby exit without even glancing in her direction: theatrically recoils in terror despite staring him dead in the face for the entirety of his testimony and walking past him devoid of any visceral emotional reaction a few hours prior.

Here, have this testimony of Amber’s neighbors detailing the wonderful treatment she received from Depp

https://inforrm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Defs-Closing.pdf

Firstly, her “neighbours” were her best friends who Johnny let live in his penthouses rent free, which is the last thing a controlling abuser would do as they always try to isolate their victim as much as possible. Secondly, you’re sending me shit that’s already been thoroughly debunked (watch Incredibly Average on YT or do a basic Google search and you’ll be bombarded by posts and audio/video footage disproving Amber and her friends claims, her bullshit injury photos etc.) as if that somehow negates all of the literal documented facts I mentioned in my post.

And most of Depp‘s witnesses are his employees, will you still dismiss their testimonies because they’re friends with/ financially dependent on Depp? Are you seriously ignoring the UK libel case, wherein the court ruled that calling him a “wife-beater” was absolutely justified based on her evidence. Are you seriously referring me to a YouTuber, when according to an actual judge Depp was “violent towards Ms Heard on multiple occasions”?

I would if Johnny’s employees had proven themselves to be liars like Amber’s besties have. But even if we disregard their testimony altogether there’s still literal fucking audio of Amber abusing, taunting, provoking and gaslighting Johnny for hours on end, in which AT. NO. POINT. IN. TIME. does he lash out at her physically, despite her claims of him losing his shit and beating tf out of her at the drop of a hat like some kind of uncontrollable beast. In fact AMBER’S the one who says, and I quote, "I can’t promise you I won’t get physical again, I just get so mad sometimes I fucking lose it.” (similar to what she said to Ben on the plane back from Australia), and JOHNNY’S the one who tells her over and over again in no uncertain terms that he WILL NOT get into a physical altercation with her and he has to leave when she gets to that point bc he can’t just stand there and take the punches. There’s at least 8 or 9 hrs of publically available audio of her ripping him to fucking shreds, talking about his kids, emasculating and demeaning him, calling him a pussy and a coward for, in her own words, “walking/running away from every fight”, guaranteeing him it’s only gonna make her worse if he does that bc she views it as him disrespecting their marriage and dehumanizing her, insulting him in a weird ass baby voice interspersed with her drunkenly cackling like a demented supervillain, admitting to starting physical fights and throwing pots, pans, vases and other objects at him, daring him to tell the world he’s a victim and see who believes him, and the list goes on.

And yes, I am referring you to a YouTuber bc the work Brian has done on this case is phenomenal. He’s spent an insane amount of time analyzing, comparing and investigating everything from witness statements to photo evidence to CCTV footage to Amber’s injuries and noting the absolute MOUNTAIN of irreconcilable inconsistencies therein, whereas the biased judge in the UK pretty much just took whatever Amber said as the truth and arbitrarily discounted everything Johnny said. But if you wanna remain willfully ignorant of the evidence and rely on the fact he lost a civil case in another country (civil cases are based on probability unlike criminal cases where a crime has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt), that’s entirely your prerogative.

As for the shit you mentioned in your tags, trashing a hotel room doesn’t equate to being a wife beater and Kate Moss has said Johnny was never violent towards her and she still supports him to this day. Ellen Barkin said he threw a bottle at a wall, NOT at her, and she also said the same thing Kate said about him not being violent towards her. The incident with the crew member was overblown bullshit. The dude was hurling racial slurs at a black woman and Johnny took issue with it, which resulted in a verbal altercation between the two (there were witnesses). The texts he sent about drowning and burning Amber weren’t even directed at her, he was venting to a friend about his abuser. If a battered wife said she hoped her male abuser got tortured to death ppl would be saying her anger was justified, but if a dude says horrible shit about his female abuser that he has no intention of acting on suddenly he’s no longer a victim. And if you take issue with what Johnny said I assume you’re equally horrified about Amber and her friend joking about her stabbing Johnny with the knife she bought him? Or does she get a pass on that bc she’s a woman? And does she also get a pass on her previous arrest for domestic violence that she was lucky enough not to be charged with bc she and her partner didn’t live in the same state the assault (which was witnessed by two police officers) took place in?

Hilarious that part of their argument was literally “a court said he couldn’t sue for defamation so that means he’s guilty.” Like, seriously? Is it crack??? Is it crack that you smoke?????

These people will take literally hours of audio recording of Amber admitting to being the abuser, countless witnesses including Johnny’s former partner and children, the physical evidence of Depp being abused, the lack of physical evidence or even medical records of Amber being abused, and toss it all out the window cuz a court ruled against him on a DEFAMATION LAWSUIT.

Like, fucking hell, they could not make it more obvious they don’t want the Pussy Pass to go away.

underthemoonn:

The audio they played of JD self harming was very triggering for me. The fact that they used it to try to make him look bad is disgusting. It was an audio of him at a low point, and her recording him in that stage is the complete opposite of love. She clearly planned this whole thing, and she has no shame.

trutown-the-bard:

sullxo:

noxvlunar:

I just wanted to bring out that whatever negative speculation we have about AH’s lawyers: that they are the worst attorneys, that they must have this hate towards JD and his lawyers. We should remember that they are for the most part just doing their jobs. Yes they come off like they have a disdain towards the opposing side but they are trying to argue for their client. And a lot of lawyers have had times where they’ve done a bad job or took on a bad client or is just fighting a case where the evidence is not on their side. I’ve legit heard a lawyer who represented someone who is clearly guilty of murder, say on closing that “Just ignore the evidence; my client couldn’t have killed this person because he came from a good family”.

Yes to of this 100%. It’s actually being reported that after closing, Chew & Bredehoft was seen shaking hands and being very friendly with each other. As well as the same with Rottenborn.

It must be said, time and time again. While Elaine is terrible, and I do mean, terrible at trial, I have no doubt she’s worth every bit of that $600/h she’s getting paid. The realest MVP is Ben Rottenborn for them, and while the arguments are shit, he’s a damn good attorney. Honestly, if he was on Johnny’s team, we’ve would be saying he’s the best damn attorney in the world. Not only that, he’s getting paid peanuts compared to everyone else in this case. Literally, everyone else. He’s getting paid $325/h. He’s definitely worth more, at least $800/h honestly.

So again, don’t ever say that anyone on Amber’s team are bad “lawyers”. They are not, they are just working with bad “facts”.

And I still stand by my assertions that Rottenborn doesn’t like Amber one bit.

It’s not just that they are working with bad facts, they are working with a bad client who refuses to do her job.

Fuckin’ yes. A lot of decisions in this case was clearly made by Amber, and Amber alone. Like keeping the counterclaim.

noxvlunar:

I just wanted to bring out that whatever negative speculation we have about AH’s lawyers: that they are the worst attorneys, that they must have this hate towards JD and his lawyers. We should remember that they are for the most part just doing their jobs. Yes they come off like they have a disdain towards the opposing side but they are trying to argue for their client. And a lot of lawyers have had times where they’ve done a bad job or took on a bad client or is just fighting a case where the evidence is not on their side. I’ve legit heard a lawyer who represented someone who is clearly guilty of murder, say on closing that “Just ignore the evidence; my client couldn’t have killed this person because he came from a good family”.

Yes to of this 100%. It’s actually being reported that after closing, Chew & Bredehoft was seen shaking hands and being very friendly with each other. As well as the same with Rottenborn.

It must be said, time and time again. While Elaine is terrible, and I do mean, terrible at trial, I have no doubt she’s worth every bit of that $600/h she’s getting paid. The realest MVP is Ben Rottenborn for them, and while the arguments are shit, he’s a damn good attorney. Honestly, if he was on Johnny’s team, we’ve would be saying he’s the best damn attorney in the world. Not only that, he’s getting paid peanuts compared to everyone else in this case. Literally, everyone else. He’s getting paid $325/h. He’s definitely worth more, at least $800/h honestly.

So again, don’t ever say that anyone on Amber’s team are bad “lawyers”. They are not, they are just working with bad “facts”.

And I still stand by my assertions that Rottenborn doesn’t like Amber one bit.

F in chat for those alternates.

Imagine sitting 6 weeks for a public trial, can’t talk to anybody, and you don’t even decide shit.

This is what happens when you piss a queen off. ✨

And that queen has 39 minutes to descriptively call you a fucking liar.

And you only have 6 minutes to respond to it.

gorgeousgreymatter-x:

people trying to predict what the jury is doing/thinking/feeling during deliberation, calm down lol

The trial was six weeks. They have 48 pages of jury instructions. That is NOT typical.

Plus, if I was that jury, I’d be taking my sweet time because people are going to go NUTS when the verdict is out no matter who you support.

I know you are all having a Mrs. Bennet moment, but take a deep breath you guys. It’s going to be okay. JD gets his life back either way.

Court is currently live during jury deliberations.

There’s a question about in the finding instructions C, particularly about the headline.

Here is the jury instructions:

Here is specifically what the jury is concerned about: 

There is confusion about whether or not the title is a statement in question or the Op-Ed. The title is what in question, and Judge Azcarate clarified.

This is be a big deal. It could be that the jury only finds that the title statement (which is Johnny’s strongest argument) is only defamatory, and not the other two.

This is also the first finding instruction for the plaintiff. Which means that the jury is most likely getting ready to decide on which statements are defamatory, and soon to be verdict. Or at least voting on it.

The entire jury instruction is actually very confusing with the language being used. I don’t know if I should make another specific post as to why, but to boil it down, linguistic speaking, it depends on how the jury determines “and” v. “or”, and “any” v. “all”, also switching between taking things as a “whole” and then separating to specific statements.

I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s another television court session.

Whew, today is stressful as fuck.

It’s being reported that the lawyers are back in court today. That is complete moot, until Judge Azcarate says a verdict has came in.

Note, once a verdict has been reached, it will be at the top of the hour, with an hour to give lawyers time to prepare.

A minor detail that always driving me fuckin’ nuts is how “Johnny wanted the trial televised”. No the fuck he didn’t, the court did. There’s an entire order on it:

It says it, right there, in plain fuckin’ English.

“THIS MATTER came before the Court on 2/25/2022, on its ownMotion…”

He didn’t ask for it, he only agreed to it. Amber did not want the trial to be televised. Geez, I wonder why? Maybe to show all your bullshit, perhaps?

snl89:

Super random return to Tumblr after what I think must be years! But having fallen down the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard rabbit hole, I’m seeing some Amber apologists on here posting the ultra gaslighting bits of Rottenborn’s closing without allowing comments, so I just felt compelled to come on and make my own comment to say: 

“If you didn’t take pictures, it didn’t happen. If you did take pictures, they’re fake. If you didn’t tell your friends, you weren’t injured. If you did tell your friends, they were part of the hoax.“ 

That is Not. TF. what we (or Camille) are saying. And it was unbelievably insulting and gross for him to frame it that way.

The reason what Amber’s done makes me so angry is because I DON’T assume anyone would lie about having suffered abuse, ever. I have argued vehemently against misogynists who DO treat women who come forward as lying until proven otherwise. So no, sir, I do not appreciate being lectured about how I’m harming women when it took the absolute mountain of evidence of her NOT being truthful to pull me away from that default. I don’t appreciate being gaslit for being upset that someone would take advantage of that default that the 99% of survivors who would never dream of lying about the abuse they’ve suffered fought, and continue to fight, so hard for. 

This is not about “if it happened you should have pictures.” This is about there being a mountain of photos, videos, and recordings proving that the incredibly severe, specific allegations she sat there recounting in gruesome detail under oath never happened

This is about her sitting there swearing up and down under oath that the video we all saw with our own two eyes of her completely uninjured, was her with two black eyes and a busted lip after having been brutally beaten in the face by a man who wears the equivalent of brass knuckles in rings. Not “the abuse wasn’t the type you would see in this video” - but specifically “yes, I had severe facial injuries in this video where my face looks flawless.” This is about her having carefully documented all manner of OTHER photos and videos exploiting Johnny’s struggles with addiction, and insisting that the harm he did to himself is somehow evidence of him having brutally, severely harmed her, while deliberately having avoided taken photos of herself after the alleged most severe attacks. 

No one. is saying. that the abuse has to be severe in order for it to count. No one is expecting survivors to have documented everything. SHE made the allegations so severe that they don’t match up with the reality we see. SHE made it impossible to believe she wasn’t sitting there this whole time appropriating the very real suffering others have had to go through. 

So to the survivors out there (especially women, for purposes of this discussion): 

I can’t control what others do, but please know that Ibelieve you, and will NEVER expect any bar of proof to do so. It took a heaping mountain of proof I could see and hear with my own eyes and ears that Amber IS lying - Amber, one single woman out of the 99% who would never dream of doing so - to make me not believe her. And her lies will never make waver in standing by you. I will always believe women, and I’ll continue to call out anyone using this trial as an excuse to do otherwise. 

I just don’t believe Amber. One specific privileged cis white woman who coopted a necessary, hard-fought feminist movement as a shield for her abusive behavior. 

/// massive rant

a-little-counter-esperanto:

people who are still using the article from The Scum to justify their hatred for JD and his supporters, Dan Wooton, AH and Justice Nichol aren’t going to gang bang you

Also, it doesn’t make sense.

As much as her stans were to cry out, Nicol found “12 out of 14 incidents of abuse” in his final judicial ruling, he shouldn’t even say that. That phrase is digusting because while both trials are talking about abuse, it’s no the focal point. Johnny has not,cannot, and will not be subjected to a criminal trial of abuse. That “12 out of 14” is super inapporiate because it implies that Johnny should’ve been, despite our judicial system that’s in place. Such a gross damn phrase.

He also dismiss a shit load of evidence that was favorable to Johnny. He denied expert testimony for Johnny’s team. He barely allowed witness testimony for Johnny. Anything that went against Amber, was dismissed essentially.

And still, the funny thing about it, Amber committed perjury despite being favorable. Read Nick Wallis transcripts, she does it in seconds. 

loading