#heresy
Question: To those who know of it, how do y’all feel about Pelagianism?
It sounds nice, but it fundamentally misunderstands what salvation is.
Pelagianism,as it is constructed and criticized by Augustine*, teaches that one does not need grace to perfectly obey God’s commandments, and (further) that one’s salvation is determined by one’s actions in this life, and those actions alone. The latter point especially is simply not feasible with the Catholic-Orthodox perspective of what salvation is - it’s not just some happy reward for those who do good things, but a very share in the life of God. And because of that, salvation is of necessity something that requires God’s intervention.
Human beings are not divine; there is absolutely nothing that human beings can do, in and of themselves, that will give them divinity. It must be given to us; that’s what grace is, the gifting of God’s very Self into our own selves.
And, frankly, that’s a good thing. We’re always talking about how we’re human, and that’s a good thing; how we mess up sometimes, how we’re not always going to be perfect. Pelagianism doesn’t really allow for that; if Pelagianism is true, if we are not drawn to sin, well, what is your excuse? Why do we sin? I very much believe that “human nature is flawed” is probably one of the most verifiable doctrines of the Christian faith; we stumble all the time. We have character flaws that predispose us to certain bad choices; do you really think you have the absolute freedom to do good in every situation that you’re in? And if you do genuinely believe that, why don’t you do the best in every situation you’re in?
Pelagianism is an attractive heresy because it assumes the absolute best of human nature, but in doing so it places an impossibly heavy burden on human nature; it makes God a Judge first and foremost, and not a Savior. And, worst of all, it encourages us to look in ourselves as the ultimate solution to our problems, rather than realizing that we are creatures meant to subsist in and coexist with others.
(*I phrase it this way because Pelagianism as we understand it probably did not exist; Augustine brought a bunch of different ideas associated with Pelagius together, and condemned them as if they were a formal and coherent system of theological thought. Poor Pelagius, condemned for these ideas, might not have even subscribed to them)
My real problem with food packaging that boasts about how “sinful” its contents are is that they seem to think anyone is going to be impressed by that. Like, okay, eating these marshmallows is a sin? Big deal. Sins are a dime a dozen – I’m probably committing a couple right now. Come back to me when you’ve got marshmallows that can blaspheme. I want to know exactly which heresies I’m committing by eating these marshmallows. I want marshmallows that caused a schism in the Catholic Church.
Marshmallows so good they make you confess Sabellianism?
Marshmallows that were personally condemned by Pope Julius II at the Fifth Lateran Council.
The Ninetey-Five Reece’s Pieces
“I don’t think there is a single drop of goodness in you,” the priest spat.
“And I don’t think you’ve ever looked for one, given that you decided I was unsalvageable and unlikeable the moment you find out I wasn’t willing to hang on to your every word without question.”
the-gay-lady-of-ravenclaw-tower:
the-gay-lady-of-ravenclaw-tower:
the-gay-lady-of-ravenclaw-tower:
so I’m a lifelong atheist and I’ve never actually read the bible but this guy sure seems like he has ADHD
you’re telling me he hyperfocused so hard he created the whole world in 6 days, then got kinda tired of it and didn’t really do anything until the project started going wrong at which point he tried in frustration to flood the whole thing so he could start over
“with the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day” bestie it is time to get tested
I unironically love the theological hot takes on this site.