#yellow jacket
Missoni at the University of Milan - Lesson 7
I told you I was coming with a big big surprise about my lessons with Missoni and here it is. But first things first.
This seventh and last lesson was our last meeting with Angela Missoni, the actual designer of the brand, and it was going to be a Q&A this time. She was of course accompanied by Rosita, who sat in the first row quietly listening to her daughter talking and answering all the questions the students had previously prepared for her - I think Rosita loved us so much she decided to come to every lesson <3 She’s such a cutie.
For this last lesson I would also like to introduce my readers to a person who was always present during the other meetings, but who I’ve never talked about because he didn’t really have much to say all the other times: Beniamino Marini, who works in the communication office of the brand (photo 2; he’s so HOT). I kinda found on the Internet something about him working for Vogue.it, but I haven’t figured out if he’s still working for them or not. Btw, this time he took the microphone to talk - very briefly - in front of us students, and asked some questions to Angela (he asked her when she is going to make public her Instagram account - and if you want to know, Angela Missoni’s account is missbrunello) and to..a very special guest.
Of course you see the photos above, so you already know who I’m talking about, but let me tell you how things worked. The Fashion History class is at 4.30 pm in a building detached from the main University building, so you have to walk a few hundred metres to get there. I also had a lesson finishing at 4.15 pm that day, so after that lesson I headed to the building where the class was going to be held. When I got to the classroom, before entering, I saw some of my classmates making very frantic gestures and I understood something was happening, because I could obviously see they were extremely excited. And then, I figured out one of them was telling me, trying to make me read her lips: ‘ANNA DELLO RUSSO IS HERE’.
You can imagine how things got inside me when I realised what was happening. It was like Christmas before Christmas, and my very fashionable Santa was Anna Dello Russo in person. I stepped into the class, and I saw her, standing just some feet next to me. I didn’t even know where to turn to go and take place at my seat next to my friends. When I finally started walking, Angela Missoni noticed my - awesome - lemon yellow jacket and said 'Oh, last time we had an orange coat, today we have a yellow jacket!’. Needless to say, that orange coat from the last lesson was mine as well - yes, I like wearing 'sober’ colours :D
Anyway of course we were all like kids in a candy store. I mean, Anna Dello Russo, one of the most important and famous fashion editors in the world, one of the most fashionable people in the world, was there, ready to talk to us, to answer our questions, to give us tips, to LOOK at us.
Yes, I feel stupid while writing these things, because I usually try not to give too much importance to celebrities (unless they are Lady Gaga, Christina Aguilera, Anna Wintour and fashion designers in general - basically a lot of people then) but this time I couldn’t hold my happiness. It was a great surprise, and just the day after my birthday!
While Angela was wearing a very simple black ensemble (with a skirt, I guess, I was too concentrated on Anna to look at her, I have to be honest) while Anna was wearing the first look of Missoni S/S 2015 collection (photo 4). I tried to take a photo of her before the lesson started, but I was shaking and you can see the result (photo 5).
Btw, the lesson started and Angela started answering some of the questions the students wrote beforehand for her. I have to be honest and say this time I was really upset with her attitude, I understand there were a lot of questions to answer to, but she was doing it as she really didn’t want to do it, very quickly and without giving to many explanations. Yes, I have to admit many of those questions were really stupid - I was actually wondering how people could possibly ask such predictable and obvious questions to someone like Angela Missoni - but anyway, she should have taken every question more seriously and dedicate more time to the Q&A. Among the questions I remember she answered, there was one about the designing process, when she said she’s not very good at designing, but she’s very good at making people design what she wants (???); someone asked about a possible collection of Missoni with another designer, to which Angela really didn’t know what to answer because 'there are so many designers I like’ - but Anna readily replied, with a grin 'J.W.Anderson!’; who’s the most important figure in fashion for her? 'Chanel, of course’, replied Angela without even having to think about it.
Anna sneaked into the conversation among all the questions and answers and started talking about how fashion is changing right now. What I loved about her - something which I really didn’t expect from her - was that everyone who listened to her could be blown away by how passionate her words were. Don’t get me wrong, I know she’s very passionate in what she does - she wouldn’t be one of the most important people in the fashion business if she didn’t - but I would have never expected she would have talked in such an inspired AND inspiring way in front of us. I could say, she was amazing.
She talked a great deal about how things work now that Internet and the digital innovation has taken over basically the entire world - fashion being one of its primary field of experimentation. She made us laugh - yes, she’s extremely funny! - saying that until some years ago, her assistants would have killed for a bag, while now they would do the same for an iWatch from Apple: 'I would prefer a bag, wouldn’t you?’ she asked the audience, who obviously replied 'Yes!’, to which she replied 'Oh, I see you’re old-fashioned then!’.
She talked about the fact that Interne has enabled every kind of person in the world to get into the world of fashion and become someone in such a short amount of time: for her the 'high towers’ of the fashion world have been destroyed, meaning that fashion has become a more accessible and welcoming field for everyone.
Well, this was basically the summary of what she said - but she talked so much that really, it would be impossible to write you guys everything she said. Anyway, there was time for some questions and I have to say some of them were hard candy for Angela and Anna (don’t underestimate the students!).
One of my friends asked Anna if, saying that the 'high towers’ of fashion were destroyed, she thought the success of many fashion bloggers - in Italy, among others, Chiara Ferragni - was not due to their wealthiness. Honestly, I didn’t understand if Anna didn’t understand the question or just tried to skip it saying something else, but she basically didn’t reply. She just repeated that now is much easier to get into fashion thanks to the Internet and that people like Chiara Ferragni put a lot of effort into what they do and bla bla bla. I personally agree with my friends: if you don’t have the money to do it, then people are not going to follow you (apart for some very few exceptions; Charles Baudelaire said the same in 1863).
I took the chance myself to ask a question to our lovely guest, and starting from the fact she said that if she could be born again, she would like to be born in one of the new generations because of the amazing power of Internet, then, didn’t she think, from a purely fashion point of view, that this is not a very 'exciting’ moment for fashion, as many fashion journalists are seeing a sort of boring repetition in what fashion brands do? Angela laughed and looked at me as I was crazy (I would have liked to add that, even if I love Missoni, her brand is, in my opinion, one of those that always do the same things over and over and really need some rethinking), and Anna was shocked as well, and replied denying it without thinking too much. She talked to me about a lot of exciting new fashion coming from Asia, especially from Korea, she gave some names (which I really couldn’t write down, you know how complicated are Asian names to understand) and openly said that is going to be the future of fashion together with Japan. She also named some Western designers, J.W.Anderson being one of the most exciting for her and citing Nicholas Ghesquière as the real starting point for all these new designers: 'If you ask them, who’s your main inspiration, they don’t talk about brands and designers from the past, but they tell you they look at Nicholas Ghesquière’.
I was satisfied with the answer, and I must say I agree with what she said, even if I think this is just one side of the coin. After all, it’s true that during the main fashion weeks, New York, London - maybe less than the others - Milan - which I love anyway - and Paris, we are currently seeing the same things, repeated millions of times to nausea. I could name some very exciting new designers, such as Stella Jean in Italy, brands like Hood by Air, or Alon Livné in Israel. But my question is: who tells us these designers are going to continue being successful? Who tell us they are not going to repeat the same things which are making us excited now, until they become just something predictable and boring? Of course, we have to trust them and hope for the best. But the big, ancient brands, we cannot even put them apart either; and they are the ones where the need for a reinvention is stronger. So yes, Anna was right, but I would have liked to reply again to what she said, just to clarify my point of view.
Hope I have the chance to do it in future. Who knows?
xxx
Oh yes. How could I forget this? Anna Dello Russo took selfies with us after the lesson! For once, you can also see me :D I put a red circle round my face in the second photo, but you could spot me from the yellow jacket I’m wearing: no doubt I’m that guy.
Post link
HAVE YOU SEEN THIS SUPERHERO?
now you have :]
stop having casual sex with men
i only have sex with men on nightmare difficulty like a real gamer
“Il n'y a pas de violence policière”
An illustration that I wanted to make a long time ago, to denounce the violence of the repression of the French government against social movements. I was in Paris on May 1, as a street medic, and I saw things that I’m not supposed to see in a “democracy”.
I decided to do this illustration 5 days ago, when I saw the firefighters gassed, and shot with flashballs by the police during a peaceful march to improve their working conditions.
Post link
So as you may or may not have seen last week Matt Lang confirmed the Hatchetfield timeline split. (you can see the clip here).
So I thought it was about time I updated my timeline diagram for Nightmare Time 2 (and also just general changes I’ve made in my own head since I last made it). Anyways here’s timeline theory 4.0.
Or as best as I can guess at them.
So as we all know NMT2 takes place on one singular timeline so I decided to sit down and take a guess at the order of events. I spent literal hours reading through the scripts to make this lol
All of these events take place in 2020 btw
I realized recently that something I had thought for the past decade was a plot hole in the A Very Potter Musical trilogy is not actually a plot hole. At the end of AVPS, Harry asks Dumbledore why he had to grow up in the muggle world, and Dumbledore says he didn’t want Harry to grow up in a place where all of this wasn’t special. But Harry doesn’t ask the follow-up question: given that he had to grow up in the muggle world, why did Dumbledore leave him with abusive muggles instead of a foster family who would actually love him? The musicals never explain it, and until recently I thought it was a plot hole. The books do explain it, but that explanation is tied with the books’ handling of elves for my least favorite plot point in the series, so I greatly preferred not having it answered in the musicals.
But recently I asked myself: how do we know the Dursleys are abusive? Maybe they aren’t abusive at all, and Lockhart simply changed them to be abusive in the books to make it sell better. At the beginning of AVPM, Harry says he doesn’t deserve the rules made by the Dursleys. But Harry is 12, so him thinking his guardians are making bad rules doesn’t necessarily mean they were actually bad parents. And he’d rather go back to Hogwarts than stay with the Dursleys, but in the song itself Harry focuses more on how awesome Hogwarts is and and how awesome being the Boy Who Lived is than how he wants to get away from bad family.
In AVPS, Harry tells Hermione that before coming to Hogwarts, he was not a popular kid in the muggle world: he was what’s known as a douchebag. He assures her that even though she wasn’t popular in the muggle world either, she can be cool and have a place in Hogwarts (and write his ancient runes essay, of course). That conversation suggests Harry prefers the magic world due to the social interactions with his peers, not due to having a bad muggle family. And crucially, When Dumbledore gives his talk about our time away from Hogwarts being what makes it special, Harry doesn’t think to ask Dumbledore the follow-up question, perhaps because Harry himself realizes the Dursleys aren’t a bad family: they just treat him like a normal kid and not a superhero.
Now, I admit there are some possible issues with this interpretation. In AVPS, Harry tells Ron he’s been living in a cupboard under the stairs. That could be explained by assuming the Dursleys are poor, not mean, which would make it extra exciting for Harry when he discovers he is rich in the wizarding world. However, I admit that probably isn’t what the Lang brothers were thinking.
Then there’s the entire song “To Have a Home.” Again, it’s at least possible that Harry feels more at home at Hogwarts because he has a whole school of peers who think he’s cool and isn’t worried about having enough to eat, in a way he wouldn’t feel in the tiny house of the Dursleys (if they are poor) and having no friends. This could be similar to how, in NMT Season 2, Episode 4, Hannah feels more at ease around her psychic teenage friends than she previously felt in Lex’s tiny appartment, despite the fact that she has a perfectly loving guardian.
I should also note that it’s been several years since I did a full rewatch of AVPS, so there might be other issues with this idea that I forgot about.
Day 7: Social
My family is unfortunately dealing with a huge nest of these highly aggressive buzzy boiz. Yellow Jackets have made a nest underneath a railroad tie at our summer house and oh man they’ll protect their home in a swarm if you get the slightest bit too close to it! My mom, g-ma, and g-pa. Have been stung so far :c
Here’s what mom looked like after her run in with one that got her riiiight on the lip!
Anyway,@saturniidays has a wonderful insectober list! Go give it a looksie and maybe consider joining in!
Just tried explaining Hatchefield to someone who had only watched the shows and holy fuck casual fans are gonna be confused come the next musical
You’re telling me Yellow Jacket is sung about Ethan???? I thought it was about Pamela-
