#stalin
by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
What’s it about?
It’s about a bunch of techie prisoners in a gulag who are tasked to make a machine to identify an individual from his voice print, something that scientists can’t even do today with any degree of reliability.
Throughout the book, Solzhenitsyn focuses on the personal lives of each of the people involved: the prisoners; the prison wardens (themselves prisoners of a sort); the government ministers; the civil service officers; and the wives and families of the prisoners who will probably never see them again.
Is Stalin in it?
Yes. There’s a famous, intentionally uncomfortable chapter where Solzhenitsyn sees things from Stalin’s point of view, although if you’ve read Game of Thrones and humanising brutal dictators is too much, you should present yourself to the relevant authorities at first light.
What should I say to make people think I’ve read it?
“I have a new appreciation for the essential dignity of the human animal.”
What should I avoid saying when trying to convince people I’ve read it?
“Nothing good ever came out of Russia.”
Should I actually read it?
Yes. What might sound kind of depressing is actually an uplifting story of how humans can form communities and survive under extraordinarily adverse conditions.
Question for the day: how many people in history of civilization have been as bad or worse at sex as Stalin? I don’t mean in the “physical sex life was bad” sense, i.e. he’s a notorious P&V kind of guy. I mean in the “hardcore statism sex is bad and this is why people did horrible things” sense. Stalin had the best sex life of anyone in history. (I mean, last I checked, anyway.)
(He also invented the kaleidoscope, for some reason. I dunno.)
About Russian Orthodox: I was doing a ton of research about the Cold War and came across this church that was destroyed by Stalin in order to construct the “ideal communist society”. Religious oppression was a significant part of the turmoil felt by the Russian people before and during the Cold War and I wanted to find a way to show that in this piece.
It took a few different mediums before the idea came to carve it straight into the wood, but once it hit me I grabbed a pocket knife and ran with it. Carving the outline of the cathedral into wood became the perfect way to show not only a semi-abstract version of the church, but also allowed it, from different angles, to almost disappear into the wood background. A perfect ode to the near destruction of the Russian Orthodox Church as a whole and the thousands that died along with it during this time.
“Those that, with the beginning of the Great Alliance’s crisis, started drawing parallels between Stalin’s Soviet Union and Hitler’s Germany had been severely criticized by Thomas Mann. What characterized the Third Reich was the “racial megalomania” of the self-proclaimed “master race”, which had carried forth a “diabolical program of depopulation”, and before that the eradication of the culture of the conquered territories. Hitler stuck to Nietzsche’s maxim: “if one wants slaves, it’s foolish to educate them like masters.” The orientation of “Russian socialism” was the precise opposite; massively expanding education and culture, it had demonstrated it didn’t want “slaves”, but instead “thinking men”, therefore placing them on the “path to freedom.“ Consequently, the comparison between the two regimes became unacceptable. Moreover, those that made such an argument could be suspected of complicity with the fascist ideology they sought to condemn.”
- Dominic Losurdo, Stalin: The History and Critique of a Black Legend
A bearish view of Putler’s Ukraine
Sa ne uitam la ce zice istoria ca va face Putin..