#geopolitics
How China’s Digital Silk Road Is Leading Countries Away from the United States
The biggest problem, IISS found, is that governments are taking no steps to determine how much or what kind of Chinese investment posed a possible risk.
This is a very good example of when the capabilities of long term thinking wins. No other government is thinking ahead as far as they need to in order to meet China’s strategy.
The fact that the earth is round has not been sufficiently studied from the military point of view.
– General Chassin, quoted by Virilio
At some point, either we have to decide to effectively cede Ukraine to Russia (bad) or actually force the issue with something more than harsh words, sanctions, and finger-wagging. Which will ultimately lead to armed conflict to one extent or another (also bad, but quite possibly less so than what we’ve been trying since Crimea)
The families losing their loved ones to hunger suicide in Afghanistan
People are dying by suicide across Afghanistan because of starvation, as the US has frozen the Afghan Central Bank’s assets and the IMF suspended access to funds after the Taliban takeover. The World Bank had also halted funding for the country—though it has now approved a package of $1 billion to address the population’s urgent needs. More than half the population, around 23m Afghans, are suffering from hunger. Millions of dollars in lost income after the collapse of the government, soaring food prices, a liquidity crisis, and shortages of cash have deprived much of the population of access to food, water, shelter, and health care.
Historian Dr. Gerald Horne on the historical and geopolitical implications of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine
r. Gerald Horne, Moores Professor of History and African American Studies at the University of Houston, and author of dozens of books, most recently “The Bittersweet Science: Racism, Racketeering, and the Political Economy of Boxing” to discuss Joe Biden imposing sanctions on Russia over the current tensions around Ukraine and how it fits into world politics, the western corporate media’s misrepresentation of the facts and history of the Ukraine situation and [US] complicity in pushing for war with Russia.
Follow:Socialist, activist and journalist-Morgan Artyukhina
Also, here’s Global times article: Evidence suggests US may have supported neo-Nazi Azov Battalion
“Ironically, despite being widely regarded as a threat to world security and an enemy of human civilization, Azov Battalion was found to have ties not only with the Ukraine authorities but also with the US. After looking into the public information from the US government and some investigative reports by Western journalists, the Global Times discovered that American politicians, military and intelligence officers were highly likely to have had cooperation with the Azov Battalion, in order to foster extremist forces in Eastern Europe against Russia.”
Hey so real quick -
I know a lot of you are young. This might be the first time you remember seeing a war break out. So I want to just give you a useful concept for thinking about this and talking about it over the next few weeks, in case you aren’t already familiar with it. That concept realpolitik.
It’s a German word that means “practical politics” (pronounced “ree-AHL pol-uh-TEEK”). What it means might be intuitively obvious, but I think it’s really helpful to have it in your back pocket as a concrete, widely-understood bit of terminology, because it can help you avoid confusion when you are talking about the crisis in Ukraine, or listening to other people talk about the crisis in Ukraine.
Realpolitik is a political and diplomatic concept that distinguishes actions taken by nations for ethical reasons fromactions taken by nations for practical reasons. That distinction - the existence of that distinction that is invoked by bringing up realpolitik - is really important in an online atmosphere where the two are often conflated out of bad faith, virtue signaling, or hysteria.
What I mean by that is: it is not a contradiction to say “the invasion of Ukraine is wrong” and “the invasion of Ukraine makes sense.” One is an ethical analysis of the situation; the other is realpolitik.
And you’re going to see a lot of people having both kinds of conversations in the coming days. And it’s important to remember that both are worth having. It is, of course, very important to emphasize the horror and unfairness of this unjust and inhumane invasion. It is, also, very important to be able to set that aside, and discuss the pragmatic causes and results of that invasion.
It is normal and sane to be upset and emotional right now. But before you get upset at something you read for sounding bloodless - or, worse, heartless - I want you to be able to ask yourself: is this a conversation about morality, or is this a conversation about realpolitik?
We are going to need both to understand what’s happening right now and what we should do about it going forward.