#evidence

LIVE

Democrats present damning video evidence in Trump’s Impeachment Trial  

“You ask what a high crime and misdemeanor is under our Constitution, that’s a high crime and misdemeanor. If that’s not an impeachable offense, then there is no such thing.”

—  lead impeachment manager, Rep. Jamie Raskin

 #IMPOTUSx2#GQP#MAGATerrorists #FailedCoup#IncitementOfInsurrection

Dear God,

Your word tells me that I will be known by my fruits. I pray that the fruit of the Holy Spirit will grow and be evident in my life, that I will be a loving and Christlike example to others, that I will have love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.

Thank you for your Holy Spirit that makes this possible, for I know when these fruits are nurtured and grown that I will be happy and content and able to reach the potential you have for me; that I will be able to minister to others through the power of the Holy Spirit; that I will be pleasing to you. Help me please to live in the Spirit, not in the flesh.

I pray and thank you in the name of Jesus, amen.

dailynietzsche:

“Synthetic judgements a priori should not be possible at all, as we have no right to them, and in our mouths they are nothing but false judgements. Only the belief in their truth is necessary, as a foreground belief and visual evidence belonging to the perspective optics of life.”

—F. Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, §11 (edited excerpt).

Caught Evidence in the LA River

Caught Evidence in the LA River


Post link
Crime SceneA crime scene is often preserved by setting up a blockade to control the movement in and

Crime Scene

Acrime scene is often preserved by setting up a blockade to control the movement in and out of a scene as well as maintaining the scene’s integrity.

A perimeter is taped off with barricade tape in order to keep only those necessary on site. This is done to prevent contaminated evidence. Investigators try to avoid contamination at all costs. 

Officers take care to not eat, drink, smoke, or take their breaks near the crime scene. Anything leftover by the officers on scene could be mistaken for potential evidence and tamper with the success of the investigation. Evidence that has become contaminated, tampered with, or mistreated can pollute the scene and cause a case to be thrown out of court. $


Post link
It’s amazing what the brain can suddenly notice when critical thinking about religion suddenly

It’s amazing what the brain can suddenly notice when critical thinking about religion suddenly turns on.

via David G. McAfee


Post link

WARNING: LONG POST WITH EVIDENCE THAT MICHAEL JACKSON IS INNOCENT AND BEING FRAMED BY THIS DOCUMENTARY YET AGAIN

**The evidence the media refuses to show you about Michael Jackson’s accusers**

I’ve felt total and utter shame at my industry as the coverage of tonight’s Michael Jackson TV show has grown increasingly dishonest and dangerous. I’ve worked in the media since I was a teenager. The whole media knows these two men are liars. But that’s not good for clicks or ratings.

For five years, these men – both professional actors – have been suing Michael Jackson’s estate for hundreds of millions of dollars. This lawsuit has generated thousands of pages of court records: witness statements, motions, depositions and disclosure. These public documents PROVE beyond any reasonable doubt that the men are lying. The whole media knows about these documents, but is refusing to report on their contents.

I’ve tried not to fill my feed with posts about this, but you are all being lied to from every direction. So this is my contribution to the debate – a list of just some of the public record information the media is refusing to tell you.

*Both men strenuously defended Jackson, including under oath, for decades, and only decided they’d been molested years after his death, when they were both in financial trouble and filed a lawsuit seeking hundreds of millions of dollars. That lawsuit was thrown out of court – twice – but the men are in the middle of an appeal, giving them a gigantic financial motive to lie.

*Since filing their lawsuit, both men have repeatedly changed their stories, frequently telling directly contradictory versions of the same supposed events. For example, Wade Robson has told at least four directly contradictory stories about the first time Jackson supposedly abused him.

*In the lawsuit, Robson was caught lying under oath so brazenly that the judge threw out his entire witness statement and said no rational juror could ever believe his account.

*Between 2012 and 2014, Robson wrote two drafts of an abuse memoir and tried unsuccessfully to sell them to publishers. Meanwhile, he lied under oath and said he’d never discussed his allegations with anyone except his lawyers. When the Jackson estate discovered he’d actually been shopping books, the court ordered him to produce the drafts as evidence. They revealed the story of his abuse had changed significantly from one draft to the next.

*Robson was also ordered to release his emails as evidence. He breached the order repeatedly, first by claiming they didn’t exist, then by simply refusing to hand them over. Then he redacted all the emails between himself and his family members and cited ‘attorney-client’ privilege, even though none of his family are attorneys.

*When he eventually complied with the court order and released the emails, they revealed that at the time he was constructing his lawsuit and abuse memoir, he was researching and emailing himself links to old tabloid newspaper stories about abuse allegations against Michael Jackson.

*The emails showed Robson found one particular story from the early 1990s which specifically named he and his mother. He emailed it to his mother and asked whether it was true. She replied, ‘Wow, none of that is true’. He then included it in his story anyway.

*Emails also revealed that throughout 2011/12, Robson was lobbying Jackson’s estate for a job directing and choreographing an official Michael Jackson tribute show in Las Vegas. His campaign to secure this role had included sending emails explaining that his amazing friendship with Jackson meant nobody was better qualified for the role than he was, and he was devoted to doing the best job he possibly could ‘for Michael’. After being told someone else had got the job, he suddenly claimed he’d been abused and filed a creditor’s claim against the estate for millions of dollars.

*Months later, according to Jimmy Safechuck, he flipped on the TV and saw Wade Robson being interviewed about his lawsuit. In that moment, Safechuck suddenly remembered that he had been abused by Jackson as well, so decided to join the lawsuit. He didn’t mention that this epiphany coincided exactly with his inheritance circling the drain after a relative died and the surviving siblings started suing each other – including him – for control of the family business.

*Robson was also ordered to produce his diaries as evidence. In them, he’d written about how these allegations might rescue his failing career by making him ‘relatable and relevant’. He also wrote, ‘It’s time for me to get mine.’ When questioned under oath about what he’d meant when he wrote that, he refused to answer.

*Both men tell stories in the TV show which directly contradict stories told under oath in their lawsuit. In fact, they have continued to change their stories as recently as within the last week.

*For example, Jimmy Safechuck claims under oath in the lawsuit that he only remembered Jackson had abused him in 2013 when he turned on the TV and saw Robson. Yet in tonight’s TV show and interviews promoting it, he claims he knew he’d been abused in 2005 and thus, when asked to testify for Jackson’s defence ‘towards the end of the trial’, he refused to do so.

*But that’s a provable lie. Safechuck was never asked to testify for Jackson’s defence. The judge ruled long before the trial began that testimony could only be heard about certain children, and Safechuck was not one of them. All testimony about Safechuck was literally banned from the courtroom. So Jackson’s defence cannot have asked him to testify – and certainly not after the trial was already underway.

*Robson claimed in a BBC interview last week that Jackson had abused him ‘hundreds of times’. Yet his mother’s sworn testimony is that they went to Neverland roughly 14 times but Jackson was almost never there. She estimates the number of times they visited the ranch and he was actually there was four.

*Questioned about their financial motive, the men now say they don’t care about money and are only suing to embolden other abuse victims by holding the Jackson estate accountable. This is a provable lie. The lawsuit was originally filed under seal and Robson tried to extract a settlement from the estate with zero publicity. Only when the estate refused to pay a bean did he go public.

I could continue, but if you’re still on board with the TV show and its accusers at this point, you are irrational to the point of mania.

Tonight’s TV show covers up all of this information, instead presenting two professional actors’ heavily edited and completely unchallenged testimony without ever examining their credibility, their proven lies and perjury, their constantly changing stories or their financial motives.

It is a stain on the journalistic profession, as has been the rest of the media’s coverage.

The Bigfoot Field Journal 2021 By J.P. Riley - “We’re Being Watched” Mt …

#bigfoot    #sasquatch    #jp riley    #mt saint helens    #mt hood    #oregon    #washington    #unexplained    #mysteries    #the bigfoot field journal    #squatchablecom    #north fork survivors    #evidence    #episode    #documentary    #series    #supernatural    #aliens    #ghosts    
aestheticoflostness:lawschoolisnotthatfun:there are evidence questions in the law schoolThis i

aestheticoflostness:

lawschoolisnotthatfun:

there are evidence questions in the law school

This is actually a hard one. You can’t get it through 404(a) because the defense didn’t open the door. And it is a “wrong” covered under 404(b) so the specific instance can’t be used to show character. Maybe Dumbledore’s testimony came in under 404(b)(2) intending to show absence of mistake or lack of accident, but none of those seem valid to contradict a self defense claim. 

I don’t think 608 is the issue here because it’s about a specific wrong. 

SOMEONE TELL ME THE ANSWER!

This was a 608(b) question. The answer was that extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instance, like you said. You have to take Dumbledore’s word for it.  


Post link

PREMISE:  From off the page and out into the city, it’s Page Turner! Richie Turner is an ordinary twelve-year-old boy with a deep love of collecting comics and a dream that one day, he too will be able fight crime like all his favorite superheroes. When Richie is contacted by an NYPD recruiter who needs his help on a special mission, it seems like this young comic fanatic’s wish is coming true. Can Richie use his unique knowledge of comic books help the NYPD crack some of their toughest cases? Kind of. Though Richie expects to be investigating crimes, he finds that the NYPD actually wants him to use the skills he’s developed maintaining and organizing his comics collection to help run the NYPD’s vast evidence library.

CHARACTERS: Richie Turner has always loved comics, and has a massive, well-organized collection, so when the NYPD is seeking an enthusiastic youngster to help them file and process evidence, Turner knows he’s the right kid for the job. He’s a whiz around the library, and is quick on the draw with a plastic bag to keep evidence in mint condition. Richie is mild-mannered, except when someone disregards or messes up his elaborate evidence organizational system. Meticulously bagging, organizing, and hoarding isn’t just his hobby–it’s his passion.
         Sgt. Granger is Turner’s supervisor. He doesn’t understand why Turner needs to keep all of this evidence, especially the stuff that won’t be used ever again and is just taking up more and more space in the station. Granger constantly tries to convince Turner to sell some of his evidence on eBay, or give it to disadvantaged police forces that don’t have any evidence of their own. Granger also helps quash the child labor investigations that continually crop up.

NOTABLE EPISODE: When two seemingly identical bullets are pulled from the walls of two different crime scenes, Turner uses his knowledge of variant comic book covers to identify the minute differences between them. Along the way, he scolds the two beat cops who handled the bullets outside of their bags, breaking the chain of evidence and, more importantly, greatly depreciating the value of the bullets (S01.E04 – “Bag ‘Em and Tag ‘Em and Board Em’”).

CATCHPHRASE: “Oh wow, this is a really rare blood sample!” / “My library, my rules.”

TRIVIA: Ironically, no memorabilia related to the show has become a valuable collector’s item. 

Not all smart people is atheist and not every stupid is creationist.But most of those…

Not all smart people is atheist and not every stupid is creationist.

But most of those…


Post link
Kik smiledom If u are open minded lady  and never shy from anything  kik me.i am here for you. Dady

Kik smiledom

If u are open minded lady  and never shy from anything  kik me.i am here for you.

Dady loves you.


Post link

byjoveimbeinghumble:

Has anyone discussed that All Too Well (the long version) is a Marianne Dashwood & Willoughby song????

someone arrest whoever created the bar exam for being the worst

because they are the worst

loading