The tree isn’t the only thing getting LIT this holiday season! We are officially hosting our Dapper Holiday Social on Dec.9th. Dress up in your favorite tie or bow-tie and get down with us!
We’re offering advance tickets for the open bar, which includes custom drinks that the lovely bartenders have crafted just for us! (cocktails usually $11 to $13)
If you aren’t drinking admission is free, just RSVP! Guests must be 21+
Social contagion. Mental-illness business is booming. No to transitioning kids. No to giving kids puberty blockers. The so-called “gender industry” must be abolished. These are nothing more than grooming clinics.
The whole “Libs of TikTok” thing gets at what I think is a pretty fundamental flaw with the platform: that it encourages minors to post video of themselves where absolutely anyone, friend or foe or fascist, can find it. For God’s sake, the beauty of the Internet used to be that you could be fucking anonymous!
Anyways, moral of the story is that the erosion of privacy in the online age puts queer people directly under threat. This fact has been obscured during the past decade of historically unprecedented social acceptance, but never forget that hiding is a tool of survival.
If that’s your sole takeaway from the Libs of TikTok issue, I’m afraid you’re missing the point.
People who are exploiting children are making videos describing how they’re doing it, and posting videos on a public platform. LoTT is reblogging those videos.
I’m glad child-exploiters are outing themselves. You should be, too.
What LoTT is doing, is putting a mirror up to those accounts that are admitting that they’re grooming and abusing children and calling them out. Then the groomers (yes, they are groomers) get upset because they don’t like what they see when they have that mirror reflecting what they willingly brag about and admit. This is in no way “putting queer people directly under threat” and if you think it is, HOW is it? What it’s doing is calling out groomers, I’ve watched enough TikTok videos to see the sexual cringe trying to be passed off as “education” or “toleranceandacceptance” to last me a life-time. I have a 5-year-old son that doesn’t need to see a grown-ass man in a dress stating, “hey kids, you can be exactly like me….” and then state his sexual conquest. This type of “education” doesn’t need to be in the faces of children. More power to LoTT, I totally support her reflecting and directing these sexual, deviant perverts messages right back to them.
Grooming is going a little too far at the local library level.
People have been objecting to this book since 2015, back when it was first published , it has always had explicit images and was intended for teenagers but for some reason, it was passed off as a book for children 10 year old and younger.
