#aristotle

LIVE
Our rare book catalogers are nearly finished cataloging this rare and elegant copy of Giannozzo ManeOur rare book catalogers are nearly finished cataloging this rare and elegant copy of Giannozzo ManeOur rare book catalogers are nearly finished cataloging this rare and elegant copy of Giannozzo ManeOur rare book catalogers are nearly finished cataloging this rare and elegant copy of Giannozzo ManeOur rare book catalogers are nearly finished cataloging this rare and elegant copy of Giannozzo ManeOur rare book catalogers are nearly finished cataloging this rare and elegant copy of Giannozzo Mane

Our rare book catalogers are nearly finished cataloging this rare and elegant copy of Giannozzo Manetti’s translation of Aristotle’s Magna moralia and Eudemian ethics. Only four other copies are known to exist.


Post link

love me some ancient Greek philosophy, so this happened


Percy

“He who is not contented with what he has would not be contented with what he would like to have.” (Socrates)

“The unexamined life is not worth living to a human.” (Plato)

“There is no great genius without a mixture of madness.” (Aristotle)

Annabeth

“True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing.” (Socrates)

“Human behavior flows from three main sources: desire, emotion, and knowledge.” (Plato)

“Educating the mind without educating the heart is no education at all.” (Aristotle)

Jason

“Let him that would move the world first move himself.” (Socrates)

“Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the law.” (Plato)

“You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the greatest quality of the mind next to honor.” (Aristotle)

Piper

“The hottest love has the coldest end.” (Socrates)

“Love is a serious mental disease.” (Plato)

“Quality is not an act, it is a habit.” (Aristotle)

Leo

“They are not only idle who do nothing, but they are idle also who might be better employed.” (Socrates)

“Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.” (Plato)

“Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work.” (Aristotle)

Hazel

“In childhood be modest, in youth temperate, in adulthood just, and in old age prudent.” (Socrates)

“Good actions give strength to ourselves and inspire good actions in others.” (Plato)

“The energy of the mind is the essence of life.” (Aristotle)

Frank

“Wars and revolutions and battles are due simply and solely to the body and its desires. All wars are undertaken for the acquisition of wealth; and the reason why we have to acquire wealth is the body, because we are slaves in is service.” (Socrates)

“Only the dead have seen the end of war.” (Plato)

“The whole is more than the sum of its parts.” (Aristotle)

Reyna

“When the debate is over, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” (Socrates)

“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” (Plato)

“The law is reason, free from passion.” (Aristotle)

Nico

“Ordinary people seem not to realize that those who really apply themselves in the right way to philosophy are directly and of their own accord preparing themselves for dying and death.” (Socrates)

“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.” (Plato)

“Happiness depends upon ourselves.” (Aristotle)

Rachel

“See one promontory, one mountain, one sea, one river and see all.” (Socrates)

“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.” (Plato)

“The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance.” (Aristotle)


I felt bad for not including Rachel in the last one because I love her character, so I made sure to put her in this one

Sunday vine #philosophy #philosophie #ethik #ethics #aristotle #coffee

Sunday vine #philosophy #philosophie #ethik #ethics #aristotle #coffee


Post link
Πάντες άνθρωποι φύσει ορέγονται του ειδέναι.- AristotleAll men by nature desire to know.

Πάντες άνθρωποι φύσει ορέγονται του ειδέναι.

- Aristotle

All men by nature desire to know.


Post link
If you’re in the habit of reading descriptions of old books—and why wouldn’t you be?—you’ve likely cIf you’re in the habit of reading descriptions of old books—and why wouldn’t you be?—you’ve likely cIf you’re in the habit of reading descriptions of old books—and why wouldn’t you be?—you’ve likely cIf you’re in the habit of reading descriptions of old books—and why wouldn’t you be?—you’ve likely c

If you’re in the habit of reading descriptions of old books—and why wouldn’t you be?—you’ve likely come across something described as bound in period style or in a sympathetic binding. This typically means the book was rebound relatively recently, but rebound in a style consistent with the time period of the book’s original publication.

For example, our first edition of the Meditationes Vitae Christi (Meditations on the Life of Christ) was rebound in such a way. You can read more about this work—a recent acquistion—here.

And shortly after the Meditations  arrived, we received the first printed Greek edition of Aristotle (it was a very good summer), which underscored just how well done this period-style binding was. Although the books were likely bound about 400 years apart—the Aristotle around 1500 and the Meditations around 1900—the styles are strikingly similar. The combination of borders built up from different tools, surrounding a central diaper pattern, was a familiar style when both were published. The Aristotle binding is almost certainly German, so it’s no surprise that the binding of the Meditations, which was printed in Augsburg in 1468, emulates a 15th-century German style.

Of all the similarities, what most caught our eyes was a particular tool used to decorate the boards. While obviously similar, small differences distinguish them. The Aristotle version, for example, has four tiny dots following Maria, while the Meditations version has no dots; a double border surrounds the Aristotle tool—thick on the outside, thin on the inside—while the Meditations tool has a single border; the Aristotle tool measures over 3 cm from end to end, while the Meditations tool measures just under 3 cm. The sheer volume of such tiny differences among tools is staggering. The Einbanddatenbank, a database of 15th- and 16th-century finishing tools used on German bindings, records more than 600 versions of the Mariatool.

How do we know the Meditations binding isn’t original? There are a number of clues, the general as-new appearance being a big one, but subtler evidence is there. The spine edges of wooden boards were commonly beveled in the late 15th century, but they aren’t here. Spines were seldom decorated at this time, yet the binder of the Meditations couldn’t help but to add some restrained decoration. Could these features be found on bindings from the late 15th century? Sure. But the accumulated weight of the evidence favors something done later in period style.

Make no mistake, the Meditations binder was good. Even the endpapers are period-appropriate leaves removed from an old book. This binding was absolutely the product of a skilled craftsperson with a thorough understanding of period styles—and perhaps the product of a binder with the skill and patience to make their own finishing tools.

~Pat


Post link

Aristotle

Aristotle, 8.2 x 11.6 inches

“Nails Before Males”

The artist’s hand is unlike any other. It moves with ease while also holding purpose and intent. The hand that holds the brush prepares for an elegant dance of vivid strokes. Delicate fingers reaching for the right tool, bending, snapping, stretching, fiddling. The impatient hand is fierce and relentless. An instrument of creation, operating with acute precision. Behold the hands, how they promise and entice. Conjuring an enchanting spell… Are you falling in love?
In his book “De Anima” (c. 350 BC), Aristotle explains, “It follows that the soul is analogous to the hand; for as the hand is a tool of tools, so the mind is the form of forms and sense the form of sensible things.” Hands are tools themselves by which we are able to utilize tools, in a similar way that the mind is a form by which we apprehend other forms. The artist’s hand brings forth life and love and lust. It conveys emotions and force and commands. Which makes the eyes envious of the artist’s hands.

RGB laser projection. Size variable

Price inquiry: camilla@island6.org

Follow us on IG: island6_gallery

 en·ter·tainˌen(t)ərˈtān/verb1.provide (someone) with amusement or enjoyment.“a tremendous gam

en·ter·tainˌen(t)ərˈtān/

verb

  1. 1.provide (someone) with amusement or enjoyment.“a tremendous game that thoroughly entertained the crowd"synonyms:amuse,divert,delight,please,charm,cheer,interest; More


  2. 2.give attention or consideration to (an idea, suggestion, or feeling).

Post link

enjolrass-barricadebooty:

I love how Ancient Greek philosophers were basically all sporty buff wrestling guys. Modern philosophers are unathletic dweebs for the most part… I want to see them wrestle… Bring back buff bicep philosophy!!!

OK I’M SERIOUS IMAGINE A JORDAN PETERSON VS SLAVOJ ZIZEK WRESTLING MATCH.

I love how Ancient Greek philosophers were basically all sporty buff wrestling guys. Modern philosophers are unathletic dweebs for the most part… I want to see them wrestle… Bring back big buff bicep philosophy!!!

nobody:

not a soul:

herodotus: so. here’s the thing about horses. they’re TERRIFIED of camels, yeah? they can’t even look at them, they can’t even SMELL them…

and-we-have-killed-him:

aristotle: *says something extremely misogynistic*

some white boy philosophy major: 

ViaPhilosophy Break: ‘The 3 different levels of friendship, according to Aristotle over 2,000 years ago…

1. The friendship of utility. These friendships are based on what someone can do for you, or what you can do for another person. It might be that you put in a good word for someone, and they buy you a drink in return. Such relationships have little to do with character, and can end as soon as any possible use for you or the other person is removed from the equation.

2. The friendship of pleasure. These are the friendships based on enjoyment of a shared activity or the pursuit of fleeting pleasures and emotions. It might be someone you go for drinks with, but would never have over for dinner, and is a common level of association for the young, so Aristotle declared. This type of relationship can again end quickly, dependent as it is on people’s ever-changing likes and dislikes.

3. The friendship of virtue. These are the people you like for themselves, who typically influence you positively and push you to be a better person. This kind of relationship, based as it is on character, is a lot more stable than the previous two categories. While Aristotle laments the rarity of such pure, mutually appreciative relationships, he believes they are possible between two virtuous people who can invest the time and energy required to forge such a bond.

Aristotle established these levels of friendship in his Nicomachean Ethics, written around 350BC.

A masterpiece of moral philosophy, the Nicomachean Ethics contains Aristotle’s vision for how human beings can achieve eudaimonia, which is variously translated from Greek as ‘well-being’, ‘happiness’, ‘blessedness’, and in the context of the virtue ethics Aristotle endorsed, ‘human flourishing’.

While friendships of utility and pleasure have their place, working at elevating them to the coveted friendships of virtue is an important part of attaining such flourishing in our own lives, Aristotle believed.’

fyeah-history:Aquamanile in the form of Aristotle and Phyllis, Southern Netherlands, c. late 14th-

fyeah-history:

Aquamanile in the form of Aristotle and Phyllis, Southern Netherlands, c. late 14th-early 15th Century
An aquamanile is a vessel for pouring water used in the ritual of washing hands in both religious and secular contexts—by the priest before Mass and in a private household before a meal. The subject of this celebrated example is the moralizing legend of Aristotle and Phyllis, which achieved popularity in the late Middle Ages. Aristotle, the Greek philosopher and tutor of Alexander the Great, allowed himself to be humiliated by the seductive Phyllis as a lesson to the young ruler, who had succumbed to her wiles and neglected the affairs of state. Encouraging Alexander to witness his folly, Aristotle explained that if he, an old man, could be so easily deceived, the potential consequences for a young man were even more perilous. The ribald subject indicates that this aquamanile was made for a domestic setting, where it would have doubled as an object of entertainment for guests at the table.


Post link
loading